#FactCheck- Manhattan Fire Video Falsely Shared as Hezbollah Attack on Israel

Introduction

‍

Imagine a scenario where a call is received by a senior citizen. The phone rings, he picks up. On the other side of the line is a polite and seemingly genuine bank official who informs him that his bank account has somehow been jeopardised and that he should quickly move his money to a safer escrow account right away. Or another situation where a police officer ends up threatening a senior citizen over a video call and places him under a digital arrest, pressuring him to pay up money in order to be set free. 

‍

This is not the storyline of a heist movie. This is the frightening new digital reality of millions of elderly people living all over the world. 

‍

Cybercrime against senior citizens has surged dramatically over the last few years. The year 2023 witnessed people (aged 60 and above), who submitted more than 101,000 complaints to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) Internet Crime Complaint Centre (IC3) in the United States. The total losses reached approximately 3.4 billion dollars, which reflected an increase of 11% in comparison to the previous year. Tech-support scams, investment frauds, government impersonation schemes, etc., have been some of the most recent and significant risks to the financial security of senior citizens.

‍

This sharp increase in cyber fraud that has been targeting the seniors has shocked everyone, from the authorities to families. From phishing emails to fake customer care numbers to various digital payment scams, cyber criminals have deliberately been exploiting the senior population. They have repeatedly displayed the ability to wipe out a senior’s entire lifetime of savings in just a matter of minutes. The rise in cyber scams has been so alarming that even the Supreme Court of India expressed a deep concern over an estimated 3,000 crore rupees that was lost due to digital arrest scams.

‍

Behind these statistics, there have been several individual cases that have revealed the true reality and the personal impact of such scams. The scale of this threat was clearly illustrated when, reportedly, an 86-year-old woman from Mumbai lost 20 crore rupees in a well-planned digital arrest scam in a timeline of 3-4 months between December 2024 and March 2025. In other real-life instances, in December 2025, multiple senior citizens from Hyderabad and Delhi were manipulated into transferring tens of lakhs under the false implication of undergoing a legal action.

‍

This blog aims to focus specifically on the ways and means of:

• How cybercriminals operate against senior citizens, 
• The most typical online scams that target seniors and
• How to quickly identify them.

‍

Revealing the Insides of the Scammer’s Playbook: How They Operate, Trick and Steal

‍

• Picking out the prey: Fraudsters use classified information from various leaked online databases, social media profiles, online images, phone directories and in some instances, even obituaries, to build comprehensive lists of potential and vulnerable senior citizen targets. It may be shocking to know that these scammers could already be aware of your age, bank, city and the details of your family members. 

‍

• Masquerading and trust theatrics: Scammers pose as authoritative figures such as bank officers, RBI (Reserve Bank of India) or tax officials, telecom staff, Microsoft or Apple tech support, CBI (Central Bureau of Investigation), ED (Enforcement Directorate) and even judges. They further support this spectacle by creating professional emails, logos, illegal websites and forged notices. Caller IDs can be spoofed and can even appear in the name of a trusted bank or a government helpline. In digital arrest scams, scammers may build a fake courtroom or police station to showcase their authority and authenticity over video calls. 

‍

• Tugging at emotions and pulling the strings of fear: Cyber fraudsters rarely rely on logic as the basis. Instead, they attack emotions. They may make statements such as: ‘your account is being used for money laundering, you may be arrested today’, thus creating feelings of fear and panic in the mind of the targeted individual. ‘You’ve won a lottery!’, another example that appeals to the emotions of greed and excitement, or ‘Grandma, I’ve been in an accident; please send money and don’t tell anyone’, a classic example that preys on the emotions of love, urgency and concern. 

‍

There are more such illustrations: ‘Once in a lifetime investment opportunity’, ‘verify your details in the next 10 minutes or else your account will be frozen, ‘your computer has been hacked; only our technical team can fix it’, and the list goes on.

‍

• The final grab: Cash, Credentials and Control: After all that pretending and emotional manipulation, cyber criminals make their last and final move that essentially closes the deal. They may ask for OTPs (one-time passwords), internet banking credentials, or remote access via screen sharing mode. In other cases, they may pressurise their victims into making direct UPI (Unified Payments Interface) transfers, RTGS (Real-time Gross Settlement) / NEFT (National Electronic Funds Transfer) transfers and payment in the form of gift cards, vouchers or cryptocurrency. This marks the extraction phase. This is the moment where access and control is attained by the fraudster. After this, financial accounts, sensitive information, data, etc., can all be quickly drained, beyond any chance of recovery. 

‍

Unveiling the Cyber Scam Spectrum

‍

Below are some of the most commonly deployed online scams that are targeted towards the senior citizens of the present day.

‍

1. Imposters in Power: Impersonation scams, on a global level, have proved to be one of the fastest-growing and costliest frauds that occur against seniors. The scammers feign and impersonate officials from banks, income tax departments or even big companies such as Amazon. They would generally warn you about a failed KYC (Know Your Customer) update, your account being blocked or a legal violation. The victim is basically caught off-guard and is forced to share crucial details such as login credentials and OTPs. 

‍

2. The Digital Arrest Scam: From Call to Con: Lately, digital arrest has become one of the most terrifying scams that senior citizens have had to face. Seniors receive a voice call or a video call from someone who claims to be a police officer or a CBI/ED officer. Then, in a strict and authoritative tone, they make false claims about how the elderly’s Aadhaar, PAN (Permanent Account Number) or phone details have come under scrutiny for being linked to serious crimes such as drug trafficking, money laundering and terrorism. They threaten the elderly that they could be put under immediate arrest, their property could be seized, or they could be publicly humiliated. Once they have established fear, they then go on to show fake documents or court orders to corroborate their assertions. 

‍

Thereafter, the senior citizen is informed that he or she has been placed under a digital house arrest. They force the victim to stay on the video call, sometimes for hours and days, ask them to follow certain instructions and repeatedly warn them not to communicate with anyone else. Scammers further exploit the fear of being jailed or the fear of legal action, and gradually extract huge sums of money from the victim. In some cases, this scam can unfold and continue over an extended timeline spanning several months. 

‍

3. Tech Support Hoax: When Help turns Hostile: As per the FBI and other multiple security analyses, tech support scams are the most commonly reported senior citizen-related frauds in the US. 

‍

A pop-up may appear on the elderly’s screen stating that: ‘your computer is infected, call this number now’. Or they might receive a call from a person posing as a tech support person from either Microsoft, Apple, a bank’s IT team or as an internet service provider. He then goes on to guide the elderly to install certain remote access software or to grant screen control access to fix the issue. Once they gain access, they pretend to find some serious infection in the user’s system or they talk about how the speed of the internet is slow and that it needs to be fixed. As a result, they quietly steal passwords, introduce malware into perfectly healthy systems, lock user access and demand ransom in return.

‍

4. Payment App Scams: Phishing, Deadly Links and OTP Snares: Phishing as a cyber scam tactic sits at the heart of many payment app scams that target senior citizens. It may begin with a harmless SMS, an email or a WhatsApp alert. These correspondences may look like they have been received from a trusted bank or a familiar online payment platform.

‍

The messages are engineered in a way that aim at grabbing attention and trigger a feeling of panic and pressure. They push the elderly users who spring into action without any caution or thought. The victim may be urged to click a link, coupled with warnings of a blocked account, a failed transaction, a failed delivery or a KYC update. The message may also ask the user to ‘verify’ certain account details. They send urgent payment links that put pressure on the senior citizen to act immediately and transfer the said amount of money. 

‍

There are also instances where an SMS or WhatsApp link may claim to offer some kind of discount or reward only if the user enters his or her card details, UPI pin or OTP. This is an extremely dangerous scenario. If these details are given away, scammers acquire access to the user’s bank account. 

‍

5. Family in Crisis: Staging Fake Emergencies: These cyber-enabled scams, also known as ‘grandparent scams’, specifically target senior citizens by impersonating their kin and creating a fake impression of them being in some kind of trouble. With the help of methods such as AI (Artificial Intelligence) voice cloning, fraudsters mimic the voice of a grandchild or a family member (which they originally obtain from social media posts or videos), making their deception tactics extremely believable. The caller may claim to be in an accident or could say they have been arrested or are stranded somewhere. They may plead with the senior citizen to make an immediate payment. 

‍

In order to avoid cross verification of their fraudulent claims, they may insist on maintaining secrecy and brainwash their victim to not inform other family members of their made-up dilemma. 

‍

6. Fraudulent Friendships and Hijacked Hearts: For many senior citizens who live alone and in the absence of family and support systems, isolation becomes a vulnerability that is very hard to overcome. Fraudsters, who closely monitor such individuals, wait to seize any opportunity to use this weakness as a gateway to carry out their deceptive schemes. 

‍

‘Companionship scams’ and ‘romance scams’ are slowly turning into a serious problem among older adults. Cyber criminals befriend or connect with older adults on social networking, matrimonial and dating apps under false pretences. As time goes by, sometimes over weeks or months, these scammers work on building emotional intimacy and trust. Once this is accomplished, they then start making requests for money. These requests can be for (fake) medical emergencies, visas, travel tickets or business deals. Sadly, victims, who are already deeply invested emotionally, end up making these money transfers, sometimes losing their lifetime savings in the process. 

‍

In some cases, when things go too far, intimate photos or private conversations are later used by cyber fraudsters for sextortion. They threaten to leak these personal materials unless the victim pays money, further adding elements of fear and pressure to an already manipulative situation.

‍

7. Fraud in the name of Health and Benefits: For most senior citizens, their daily life depends on access to basic healthcare, uninterrupted pensions and government benefits. These systems are put in place to provide not just for the seniors’ financial stability, but also to ensure their peace of mind. 

‍

Conversely, fraudsters exploit this dependability. Fake medical offers, insurance plans, benefit claims and pension enhancement schemes, etc., are some of the methods that are being used to defraud the seniors. Scammers offer free medical equipment or health checkups in exchange for personal information related to banking and finances. 

‍

Another dangerous facet of these scams is ‘counterfeit medications’. These are sold under false claims and big promises and are advertised in a manner that tempts seniors to go for it. These fake medicines not only lead to loss of money but also gravely impact the elderly’s health. 

‍

Spot the Scam: Tips to Identify Early Warning Signs before the Scam Unfolds

‍

Cyber criminals are clever, creative and notorious, but their tricks come with familiar warning signs. Timely recognition of these signs can save senior citizens from falling into the scammer’s trap. Some of the most common and apparent warning signs are discussed below:

‍

• Don’t think fast, think twice! The urgency ploy: Cyber criminals thrive on creating a situation of panic and urgency. In instances where a senior citizen feels that he or she is being pushed towards rushed choices, it is better to take a step back to pause and think. Any unreasonable demand to act ‘immediately’ or within minutes, especially when it involves a transfer of money or confidential information, is very likely to be a scam. Not giving in to this hasty push can save the individual from getting tangled in the scammer’s web of lies.

‍

• Scammer’s best friend: Secrecy and silence: First comes the urgency, and then comes the demand to stay silent. Scammers strategically cite and invent so-called ‘security reasons’ and instruct their elderly victims not to inform their bank, friends or family of their situation. This secrecy prevents verification and keeps the victim trapped. Recognising this forced isolation can stop a cybercrime before it escalates and gets out of hand.

‍

• Red flag! When the deal sounds unreal: Scammers lure elderly victims with extraordinary offers and deals. Lottery wins, miracle investment returns, massive discounts or exclusive time-bound rewards are a few examples. These larger-than-life promises are designed in a manner that clouds an elderly person’s sound judgment. Therefore, if an offer feels too good to be true and unlike anything anyone’s ever heard before, then that’s the time to pause and take a step back. In almost all such cases, these unbelievable deals are simply a bait for a looming scam. 

‍

• Beware! They want your access codes: Senior citizens need to exercise extra caution when it comes to handing out their personal access codes. No legitimate bank, government office or reputable company will directly ask for OTPs, PINs or full passwords over calls or messaging apps. If someone asks for such details, it is an indication that a fraud may be imminent. 

‍

• Don’t pay just yet! Dubious payment gambits: If demands for payments are made in the form of gift cards, cryptocurrency or wire transfers to personal or unknown accounts, it is most definitely a scam. Scammers use these unconventional payment methods to avoid traceability. This strategy allows them to easily disappear with the victim’s funds, which in turn makes recovery of the stolen money nearly impossible.

‍

• Threats and intimidation over a phone call: Hang up! It’s a scam: It is important to understand that legitimate police and court proceedings do not take place over calls or messaging apps. Genuine officials will never demand or negotiate fines, legal payments or bail online. If someone uses the intimidation ploy on a senior citizen and threatens him with legal trouble or police action unless some money is paid, then that’s a clear warning sign of a cyber scam. 

‍

Empowered, not Exploited: When Knowledge Becomes the Best Defence

‍

Cyber scams targeting senior citizens are a deliberate and very well-orchestrated industry that thrives on uncertainty, ignorance and fear. The call of the moment is for the elderly and their families to turn awareness into armour. Knowledge about how scammers operate, how they steal, and the techniques they employ can prepare and empower our seniors to protect themselves in such critical situations. The early warning signs mentioned above are more than just mere cautions. They should be taken as ‘cues’ to ‘pause, reflect and re-check’. Being wary of unsolicited communication, safeguarding financial information, double-checking hurried correspondences, etc., can nip a scam in the bud before it plays out. Most importantly, digital safety for the senior citizens is a unified and collaborative responsibility that every responsible individual of the society needs to undertake. 

‍

References

‍

• https://frontline.thehindu.com/social-issues/ai-deepfake-digital-arrest-scams-india-cybercrime/article70587955.ece
• https://www.ic3.gov/annualreport/reports/2023_ic3elderfraudreport.pdf
• https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/supreme-court-shocked-over-3000-crore-loss-in-digital-arrest-scams/article70235621.ece
• https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/mumbai/elderly-woman-loses-20-crore-to-digital-arrest-fraud-3-held/article69353437.ece
• https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hyderabad/three-senior-citizens-duped-of-rs-1-7cr-in-digital-arrest-scam-spree/articleshow/125876194.cms
• https://www.aninews.in/news/national/general-news/82-year-old-senior-citizen-digitally-arrested-and-cheated-of-rs-116-crore-cyber-cell-arrests-three-key-members-of-syndicate20251213145528/
• https://crr.bc.edu/preventing-cyber-scams-that-target-seniors/
• https://dos.ny.gov/scams-targeting-older-adults
• https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/chandigarh/victims-in-8-of-top-10-digital-arrest-scams-in-chandigarh-are-senior-citizens-data-reveals-10444252/
• https://www.seniorliving.org/research/common-elderly-scams/
• https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/data-visualizations/data-spotlight/2025/08/false-alarm-real-scam-how-scammers-are-stealing-older-adults-life-savings
• https://www.psca.org/news/psca-news/2025/8/scams-against-seniors-increasing-dramatically-ftc-warns/
• https://www.pcmatic.com/blog/the-rising-threat-of-elder-fraud-insights-from-ic3s-2023-report/?srsltid=AfmBOorC069NIYFwFO0W56nPcg_K0Wfv_oq0V-MI7fImI5ityAUrQTO9
• https://www.quickheal.co.in/knowledge-centre/guarding-our-elders-a-comprehensive-report-on-the-elder-fraud-epidemic-in-india/?srsltid=AfmBOorviPvoRuecjsOtAfVxyQEJF2vyICnr15GqbDfP1m3UXAnXndMw
• https://www.ncoa.org/article/top-5-financial-scams-targeting-older-adults/
• https://www.uchealth.org/today/elder-fraud-is-rising-and-it-is-hurting-more-than-just-finances/
• https://centerlighthealthcare.org/protecting-yourself-online-recognizing-and-avoiding-online-scams/

‍

Introduction

‍

“an intermediary, on whose computer resource the information is stored, hosted or published, upon receiving actual knowledge in the form of an order by a court of competent jurisdiction or on being notified by the Appropriate Government or its agency under clause (b) of sub-section (3) of section 79 of the Act, shall not ‍, which is prohibited under any law for the time being in force in relation to the interest of the sovereignty and integrity of India; security of the State; friendly relations with foreign States; public order; decency or morality; in relation to contempt of court; defamation; incitement to an offence relating to the above, or any information which is prohibited under any law for the time being in force”

‍

Law grows by confronting its absences, it heals itself through its own gaps. The most recent notification from MeitY, G.S.R. 775(E) dated October 22, 2025, is an illustration of that self-correction. On November 15, 2025, the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2025, will come into effect. They accomplish two crucial things: they restrict who can use "actual knowledge” to initiate takedown and require senior-level scrutiny of those directives. By doing this, they maintain genuine security requirements while guiding India’s content governance system towards more transparent due process. 

‍

When Regulation Learns Restraint

‍

To better understand the jurisprudence of revision, one must need to understand that Regulation, in its truest form, must know when to pause. The 2025 amendment marks that rare moment when the government chooses precision over power, when regulation learns restraint. The amendment revises Rule 3(1)(d) of the 2021 Rules. Social media sites, hosting companies, and other digital intermediaries are still required to take action within 36 hours of receiving “actual knowledge” that a piece of content is illegal (e.g. poses a threat to public order, sovereignty, decency, or morality). However, “actual knowledge” now only occurs in the following situations: 

(i) a court order from a court of competent jurisdiction, or

(ii) a reasoned written intimation from a duly authorised government officer not below Joint Secretary rank (or equivalent)

‍

The authorised authority in matters involving the police “must not be below the rank of Deputy Inspector General of Police (DIG)”. This creates a well defined, senior-accountable channel in place of a diffuse trigger. 

There are two more new structural guardrails. The Rules first establish a monthly assessment of all takedown notifications by a Secretary-level officer of the relevant government to test necessity, proportionality, and compliance with India’s safe harbour provision under Section 79(3) of the IT Act. Second, in order for platforms to act precisely rather than in an expansive manner, takedown requests must be accompanied by legal justification, a description of the illegal act, and precise URLs or identifiers. The cumulative result of these guardrails is that each removal has a proportionality check and a paper trail. 

‍

Due Process as the Law’s Conscience 

‍

Indian jurisprudence has been debating what constitutes “actual knowledge” for over a decade. The Supreme Court in Shreya Singhal (2015) connected an intermediary’s removal obligation to notifications from official channels or court orders rather than vague notice. But over time, that line became hazy due to enforcement practices and some court rulings, raising concerns about over-removal and safe-harbour loss under Section 79(3). Even while more recent decisions questioned the “reasonable efforts” of intermediaries, the 2025 amendment institutionally pays homage to Shreya Singhal’s ethos by refocusing “actual knowledge” on formal reviewable communications from senior state actors or judges. 

The amendment also introduces an internal constitutionalism to executive orders by mandating monthly audits at the Secretary level. The state is required to re-justify its own orders on a rolling basis, evaluating them against proportionality and necessity, which are criteria that Indian courts are increasingly requesting for speech restrictions. Clearer triggers, better logs, and less vague “please remove” communications that previously left compliance teams in legal limbo are the results for intermediaries.

‍

The Court’s Echo in the Amendment

‍

The essence of this amendment is echoed in Karnataka High Court’s Ruling on Sahyog Portal, a government portal used to coordinate takedown orders under Section 79(3)(b), was constitutional. The HC rejected X’s (formerly Twitter’s) appeal contesting the legitimacy of the portal in September. The business had claimed that by giving nodal officers the authority to issue takedown orders without court review, the portal permitted arbitrary content removals. The court disagreed, holding that the officers’ acts were in accordance with Section 79 (3)(b) and that they were “not dropping from the air but emanating from statutes.” The amendment turns compliance into conscience by conforming to the Sahyog Portal verdict, reiterating that due process is the moral grammar of governance rather than just a formality. 

‍

Conclusion: The Necessary Restlessness of Law 

‍

Law cannot afford stillness; it survives through self doubt and reinvention. The 2025 amendment, too, is not a destination, it’s a pause before the next question, a reminder that justice breathes through revision. As befits a constitutional democracy, India’s path to content governance has been combative and iterative. The next rule making cycle has been sharpened by the stays split judgments, and strikes down that have resulted from strategic litigation centred on the IT Rules, safe harbour, government fact-checking, and blocking orders. Lessons learnt are reflected in the 2025 amendment: review triumphs over opacity; specificity triumphs over vagueness; and due process triumphs over discretion. A digital republic balances freedom and force in this way. 

‍

Sources

• https://pressnews.in/law-and-justice/government-notifies-amendments-to-it-rules-2025-strengthening-intermediary-obligations/ 
• https://www.meity.gov.in/static/uploads/2025/10/90dedea70a3fdfe6d58efb55b95b4109.pdf 
• https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2181719 
• https://www.scobserver.in/journal/x-relies-on-shreya-singhal-in-arbitrary-content-blocking-case-in-karnataka-hc/ 
• https://www.medianama.com/2025/10/223-content-takedown-rules-online-platforms-36-hr-deadline-officer-rank/#:~:text=It%20specifies%20that%20government%20officers,Deputy%20Inspector%20General%20of%20Police%E2%80%9D.

‍

‍

AI and other technologies are advancing rapidly. This has ensured the rapid spread of information, and even misinformation. LLMs have their advantages, but they also come with drawbacks, such as confident but inaccurate responses due to limitations in their training data. The evidence-driven retrieval systems aim to address this issue by using and incorporating factual information during response generation to prevent hallucination and retrieve accurate responses.

What is Retrieval-Augmented Response Generation?

Evidence-driven Retrieval Augmented Generation (or RAG) is an AI framework that improves the accuracy and reliability of large language models (LLMs) by grounding them in external knowledge bases. RAG systems combine the generative power of LLMs with a dynamic information retrieval mechanism. The standard AI models rely solely on pre-trained knowledge and pattern recognition to generate text. RAG pulls in credible, up-to-date information from various sources during the response generation process. RAG integrates real-time evidence retrieval with AI-based responses, combining large-scale data with reliable sources to combat misinformation. It follows the pattern of:

• Query Identification: When misinformation is detected or a query is raised.
• Evidence Retrieval: The AI searches databases for relevant, credible evidence to support or refute the claim.
• Response Generation: Using the evidence, the system generates a fact-based response that addresses the claim.

How is Evidence-Driven RAG the key to Fighting Misinformation?

• RAG systems can integrate the latest data, providing information on recent scientific discoveries.
• The retrieval mechanism allows RAG systems to pull specific, relevant information for each query, tailoring the response to a particular user’s needs.
• RAG systems can provide sources for their information, enhancing accountability and allowing users to verify claims.
• Especially for those requiring specific or specialised knowledge, RAG systems can excel where traditional models might struggle.
• By accessing a diverse range of up-to-date sources, RAG systems may offer more balanced viewpoints, unlike traditional LLMs.

Policy Implications and the Role of Regulation

With its potential to enhance content accuracy, RAG also intersects with important regulatory considerations. India has one of the largest internet user bases globally, and the challenges of managing misinformation are particularly pronounced.

• Indian regulators, such as MeitY, play a key role in guiding technology regulation. Similar to the EU's Digital Services Act, the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, mandate platforms to publish compliance reports detailing actions against misinformation. Integrating RAG systems can help ensure accurate, legally accountable content moderation. 
• Collaboration among companies, policymakers, and academia is crucial for RAG adaptation, addressing local languages and cultural nuances while safeguarding free expression. 
• Ethical considerations are vital to prevent social unrest, requiring transparency in RAG operations, including evidence retrieval and content classification. This balance can create a safer online environment while curbing misinformation.

Challenges and Limitations of RAG

While RAG holds significant promise, it has its challenges and limitations.

• Ensuring that RAG systems retrieve evidence only from trusted and credible sources is a key challenge. 
• For RAG to be effective, users must trust the system. Sceptics of content moderation may show resistance to accepting the system’s responses. 
• Generating a response too quickly may compromise the quality of the evidence while taking too long can allow misinformation to spread unchecked.

Conclusion

Evidence-driven retrieval systems, such as Retrieval-Augmented Generation, represent a pivotal advancement in the ongoing battle against misinformation. By integrating real-time data and credible sources into AI-generated responses, RAG enhances the reliability and transparency of online content moderation. It addresses the limitations of traditional AI models and aligns with regulatory frameworks aimed at maintaining digital accountability, as seen in India and globally. However, the successful deployment of RAG requires overcoming challenges related to source credibility, user trust, and response efficiency. Collaboration between technology providers, policymakers, and academic experts can foster the navigation of these to create a safer and more accurate online environment. As digital landscapes evolve, RAG systems offer a promising path forward, ensuring that technological progress is matched by a commitment to truth and informed discourse.

References

• https://experts.illinois.edu/en/publications/evidence-driven-retrieval-augmented-response-generation-for-onlin 
• https://research.ibm.com/blog/retrieval-augmented-generation-RAG 
• https://medium.com/@mpuig/rag-systems-vs-traditional-language-models-a-new-era-of-ai-powered-information-retrieval-887ec31c15a0 
• https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383701402_Web_Retrieval_Agents_for_Evidence-Based_Misinformation_Detection 

‍