#FactCheck: 2023 Manipur Violence Video Falsely Shared as Indian Army Bombing Minority House
Executive Summary
A video showing a house collapsing after a massive explosion is being widely shared on social media with the claim that it shows the Indian Armed Forces bombing the house of a minority community in Manipur. CyberPeace Research Wing ’s research found that the claim is false. The viral video dates back to 2023 and shows a house being demolished in Churachandpur during the ethnic violence between the Kuki and Meitei communities in Manipur.
Claim:
An X (formerly Twitter) user shared the video with the caption: “This is Manipur, not Palestine. The Indian Army is destroying minority houses in Manipur.”
The post claimed that the visuals showed the Indian Army carrying out an attack on minority community houses in Manipur.
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1042491035382024
Fact Check:
To verify the claim, CyberPeace Research Wing conducted a reverse image search using keyframes extracted from the viral video. During the search, we found the same video shared by NDTV’s official Instagram account on July 21, 2024.
According to the caption of the post, the video was from 2023, when ethnic clashes broke out between the Kuki and Meitei communities in Manipur. The post stated that the incident took place in Churachandpur, where the house of Naorem Ibomcha Meitei was destroyed by the Kuki community during the violence.
https://www.instagram.com/reels/C9sQWeTSCFx/
Further research revealed that India Today had also shared the same video with similar details
https://www.instagram.com/reels/C9sRq1nSy51/
Conclusion:
The research found that the viral video is being circulated with a misleading claim. The footage does not show the Indian Armed Forces bombing a minority community’s house in Manipur. It is from 2023 and shows the demolition of a house in Churachandpur during the ethnic violence between the Kuki and Meitei communities.
Related Blogs
The Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, 2023, operationalises data privacy largely through a consent management framework. It aims to give data principles, ie, individuals, control over their personal data by giving them the power to track, change, and withdraw their consent from its processing. However, in practice, consent management is often not straightforward. For example, people may be frequently bombarded with requests, which can lead to fatigue and eventual overlooking of consent requests. This article discusses the way consent management is handled by the DPDP Act, and looks at how India can design the system to genuinely empower users while holding organisations accountable.
Consent Management in the DPDP Act
According to the DPDP Act, consent must be unambiguous, free, specific, and informed. It must also be easy for people to revoke their consent (DPO India, 2023). To this end, the Act creates Consent Managers- registered middlemen- who serve as a link between users and data custodians.
The purpose of consent managers is to streamline and centralise the consent procedure. Users can view, grant, update, or revoke consent across various platforms using the dashboards they offer. They hope to improve transparency and lessen the strain on people to keep track of permissions across different services by standardising the way consent is presented (IAPP, 2024).
The Act draws inspiration from international frameworks such as the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation), mandating that Indian users be provided with a single platform to manage permissions rather than having to deal with dispersed consent prompts from every service.
The Challenges
Despite the mandate for an interoperable platform for consent management, several key challenges emerge. There is a lack of clarity on how consent management will be operationalised. This creates challenges of accountability and implementation. Thus, :
- If the interface is poorly designed, users could be bombarded with content permissions from apps/platforms/ services that are not fully compliant with the platform.
- If consent notices are vague, frequent, lengthy, or complex, users may continue to grant permissions without meaningful engagement.
- It leaves scope for data fiduciaries to use dark patterns to coerce customers into granting consent through poor UI/UX design.
- The lack of clear, standardised interoperability protocols across sectors could lead to a fragmented system, undermining the goal of a single, easy-to-use platform.
- Consent fatigue could easily appear in India's digital ecosystem, where apps, e-commerce websites, and government services all ask for permissions from over 950 million internet subscribers. Experiences from GDPR countries show that users who are repeatedly prompted eventually become banner blind, which causes them to ignore notices entirely.
- Low levels of literacy (including digital literacy) and unequal access to digital devices among women and marginalised communities create complexities in the substantive coverage of privacy rights.
- Placing the burden of verification of legal guardianship for children and persons with disabilities (PwDs) on data fiduciaries might be ineffective, as SMEs may lack the resources to undertake this activity. This could create new forms of vulnerability for the two groups.
Legal experts claim that this results in what they refer to as a legal fiction, wherein consent is treated as valid by the law despite the fact that it does not represent true understanding or choice (Lawvs, 2023). Additionally, research indicates that users hardly ever read privacy policies in their entirety. People are very likely to tick boxes without fully understanding what they are agreeing to. By drastically limiting user control, this has a bearing on the privacy rights of Indian citizens and residents. (IJLLR, 2023).
Impacts of Weak Consent Management:
According to the Indian Journal of Law and Technology, in an era of asymmetry and information overload, privacy cannot be sufficiently protected by relying only on consent (IJLT, 2023). Almost every individual will be impacted by inadequate consent management.
- For Users: True autonomy is replaced by the appearance of control. Individuals may unintentionally disclose private information, which undermines confidence in digital services.
- For Businesses: Compliance could become a mere formality. Further, if acquired consent is found to be manipulated or invalid, it creates space for legal risks and reputational damage.
- For Regulators: It becomes difficult to oversee a system where consent is frequently disregarded or misinterpreted. When consent is merely formal, the law's promise to protect personal information is undermined.
Way Forward
- Layered and Simplified Notices: Simple language and layers of visual cues should be used in consent requests. Important details like the type of data being gathered, its intended use, and its duration should be made clear up front. Additional explanations are available for users who would like more information. This method enhances comprehension and lessens cognitive overload (Lawvs, 2023).
- Effective Dashboards: Dashboards from consent managers should be user-friendly, cross-platform, and multilingual. Management is made simple by features like alerts, one-click withdrawal or modification, and summaries of active permissions. The system is more predictable and dependable when all services use the same format, which also reduces confusion (IAPP, 2024).
- Dynamic and Contextual Consent: Instead of appearing as generic pop-ups, consent requests should show up when they are pertinent to a user's actions. Users can make well-informed decisions without feeling overburdened by subtle cues, such as emphasising risks when sensitive data is requested (IJLLR, 2023).
- Accountability of Consent Managers: Organisations that offer consent management services must be accountable and independent, through clear certification, auditing, and specific legal accountability frameworks. Even when formal consent is given, strong trustee accountability guarantees that data is not misused (IJLT, 2023).
- Complementary Protections Beyond Consent: Consent continues to be crucial, but some high-risk data processing might call for extra protections. These may consist of increased responsibilities for fiduciaries or proportionality checks. These steps improve people's general protection and lessen the need for frequent consent requests (IJLLR, 2023).
Conclusion
The core of the DPDP Act is to empower users to have control over their data through measures such as consent management. But requesting consent is insufficient; the system must make it simple for people to manage, monitor, and change it. Effectively designed, managed, and executed consent management has the potential to revolutionise user experience and trust in India's digital ecosystem if it is implemented carefully.To make consent management genuinely meaningful, it is imperative to standardise procedures, hold fiduciaries accountable, simplify interfaces, and investigate supplementary protections.
References
Building Trust with Technology: Consent Management Under India’s DPDP Act, 2023
Consent Fatigue and Data Protection Laws: Is ‘Informed Consent’ a Legal Fiction
Beyond Consent: Enhancing India's Digital Personal Data Protection Framework
Top 10 operational impacts of India’s DPDPA – Consent management
Executive Summary:
An alleged video is making the rounds on the internet featuring Ranveer Singh criticizing the Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Government. But after examining the video closely it revealed that it has been tampered with to change the audio. In fact, the original videos posted by different media outlets actually show Ranveer Singh praising Varanasi, professing his love for Lord Shiva, and acknowledging Modiji’s role in enhancing the cultural charms and infrastructural development of the city. Differences in lip synchronization and the fact that the original video has no sign of criticizing PM Modi show that the video has been potentially manipulated in order to spread misinformation.
Claims:
The Viral Video of Bollywood actor Ranveer Singh criticizing Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Fact Check:
Upon receiving the Video we divided the video into keyframes and reverse-searched one of the images, we landed on another video of Ranveer Singh with lookalike appearance, posted by an Instagram account named, “The Indian Opinion News''. In the video Ranveer Singh talks about his experience of visiting Kashi Vishwanath Temple with Bollywood actress Kriti Sanon. When we watched the Full video we found no indication of criticizing PM Modi.
Taking a cue from this we did some keyword search to find the full video of the interview. We found many videos uploaded by media outlets but none of the videos indicates criticizing PM Modi as claimed in the viral video.
Ranveer Singh shared his thoughts about how he feels about Lord Shiva, his opinions on the city and the efforts undertaken by the Prime Minister Modi to keep history and heritage of Varanasi alive as well as the city's ongoing development projects. The discrepancy in the viral video clip is clearly seen when we look at it closely. The lips are not in synchronization with the words which we can hear. It is clearly seen in the original video that the lips are in perfect synchronization with the words of audio. Upon lack of evidence to the claim made and discrepancies in the video prove that the video was edited to misrepresent the original interview of Bollywood Actor Ranveer Singh. Hence, the claim made is misleading and false.
Conclusion:
The video that claims Ranveer Singh criticizing PM Narendra Modi is not genuine. Further investigation shows that it has been edited by changing the audio. The original footage actually shows Singh speaking positively about Varanasi and Modi's work. Differences in lip-syncing and upon lack of evidence highlight the danger of misinformation created by simple editing. Ultimately, the claim made is false and misleading.
- Claim: A viral featuring Ranveer Singh criticizing the Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Government.
- Claimed on: X (formerly known as Twitter)
- Fact Check: Fake & Misleading
Executive Summary
A video circulating on social media claims that Iran’s new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei has passed away, with users attributing the claim to American sources. However, research by the CyberPeace found the claim to be false. Our research confirms that Mojtaba Khamenei is alive and in good health.
Claim
A Facebook user shared the viral video, claiming that Iran’s new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei had died.
Fact Check
To verify the claim, we conducted keyword searches on Google but found no credible media reports confirming his death. Further research led us to a report published on April 10, 2026, by ABP News. According to the report, amid discussions around a ceasefire, Mojtaba Khamenei issued a statement saying that Iran does not seek war with the United States or Israel, but as a nation, it must defend its rights.
Additionally, the image used in the viral video was analyzed using the AI detection tool HIVE Moderation. The results indicated a 99% probability that the image is AI-generated.
Conclusion
The viral claim is false and misleading. There is no credible evidence to suggest that Mojtaba Khamenei has died. On the contrary, recent verified reports confirm that he is alive and has even issued public statements on ongoing geopolitical developments. The widespread circulation of this claim appears to be driven by misinformation, amplified through social media without verification. The use of AI-generated visuals further adds to the confusion, making the content appear authentic at first glance.
