#FactCheck - Viral Video of Salman Khan and Govinda Falsely Linked to Mithun Chakraborty’s Death
Executive Summary:
A video is being circulated on social media claiming that veteran actor Mithun Chakraborty has passed away. The viral clip shows actors Salman Khan and Govinda leaving in their respective cars. Social media users are sharing this footage while claiming that the actors were seen after the alleged demise of Mithun Chakraborty. However, research by the CyberPeace found the claim to be false. Our research revealed that Mithun Chakraborty is completely healthy and the claim about his death is misleading.
Claim
On March 6, 2026, an Instagram user shared the viral video claiming that actor Mithun Chakraborty had passed away.
Fact Check:
To verify the claim, we searched relevant keywords on Google. During this search, we did not find any credible media report confirming the death of Mithun Chakraborty.
We further checked the social media accounts of Mithun Chakraborty’s son Mahaakshay Chakraborty, but found no information related to the viral claim. This indicated that the posts circulating on social media about the actor’s death were false. To trace the origin of the viral footage, we extracted key frames from the video showing Salman Khan and Govinda and conducted a reverse image search using Google Lens. During the search, we found the clip featuring Salman Khan on the Facebook page of Times Now, posted on November 11, 2025.
According to the report, Salman Khan and Shah Rukh Khan were seen leaving Breach Candy Hospital in Mumbai, where veteran actor Dharmendra had been admitted on November 10 after his health suddenly deteriorated. The clip featuring Govinda was also found on the website of Navbharat Times, published on November 11, 2025. According to the report, Govinda had arrived late at night at Breach Candy Hospital to visit Dharmendra after he was hospitalized due to health issues.
Conclusion
Our research found that the viral claim is false. Actor Mithun Chakraborty is alive and healthy. The video circulating on social media actually shows Salman Khan and Govinda visiting Breach Candy Hospital in November 2025 when actor Dharmendra was admitted, and it has been wrongly linked to Mithun Chakraborty’s death.
Related Blogs
India’s Rapid Digital Expansion
Over the past decade, India has experienced a rapid digitalisation process. The rise of digital financial services, affordable internet costs, and the penetration of smartphones have transformed the way people communicate, transact and do business online.
Online payment systems, including Unified Payments Interface (UPI), have enabled real-time transactions between banks and financial systems. As much as these systems have enhanced access to finance and efficiency, they have also created new opportunities for cybercriminals.
Cybercrime has evolved alongside the shift of financial and social interactions to digital platforms. The fraud attacks on online payments, online banking, and personal information have become common and increasingly costly.
To analyse the scale and trend of cybercrime in India, this analysis will use the datasets released by the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) and financial fraud data released by the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C) under the Ministry of Home Affairs.
The Rise of Cybercrime in India
The Rise of Cybercrime in India
Source: National Crime Records Bureau – Crime in India Reports
The data released by the NCRB documents cybercrime incidents registered by the police at the national level under the Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act) and criminal provisions covering offences such as cheating, impersonation, and digital fraud. In the past, the offences were listed in the provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Following criminal law reforms in India, on 1 July 2024, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which replaced the IPC, came into force. Section 419 (cheating by impersonation), IPC, would be related to BNS Section 319 and Section 420 (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property), which would be related to BNS Section 318(4). Similarly, crimes involving forgery and use of forged documents or electronic documents, which were previously contained in the IPC Sections 465-471, are dealt with in BNS Sections 335-340.
The data published by the NCRB represent the number of crimes that reached the point of the First Information Report (FIR) registration, meaning they reflect only cybercrime cases that were formally presented to the law enforcement system to investigate, rather than all complaints reported. The data shows that cybercrime cases increased from 27,248 in 2018 to 86,420 in 2023, a 3.17-fold increase in 5 years.
Two structural shifts are visible: the post-pandemic jump and subsequent acceleration.
However, these figures likely underestimate the true scale of cybercrime because many incidents are reported only through online complaint portals and may not result in FIR registration.
The Financial Scale of Digital Fraud
The Financial Scale of Digital Fraud
This dataset tracks financial fraud complaints reported through the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal (NCRP) and the estimated financial losses associated with those complaints.
The financial losses reported between 2021 and 2024 increased by 41 times over four years, compared to 2021, from 551 crore to 22,848 crore. At the same time, the number of complaints rose from 262,846 to over 1.9 million, an increase of ~623%, indicating both rising victimisation and greater public awareness of reporting mechanisms.
The contrast between these two trends is striking:
While complaints increased by around 7 times, financial losses increased by over 40 times.
Distribution of Cyber-Fraud Complaints and Financial Losses by Fraud Type
This divergence implies an uneven relationship between the number of incidents and the financial damage that they inflict. Most cyber fraud incidents involve relatively small transaction values; however, a smaller group of fraud categories result in disproportionate numbers of financial losses.
Distribution of Financial Losses Across Major Cyber-Fraud Categories in India
As reported by The Indian Express, based on the data compiled by the I4C, investment-related scams alone account for roughly 77% of reported cyber-fraud losses, followed by smaller shares from “digital arrest” scams (8%), credit card fraud (7%), sextortion (4%), e-commerce fraud (3%), and malware or app-based fraud (1%). This distribution means that even though scams with lower values, like phishing, OTP fraud, and small payment fraud, produce a high proportion of complaints, few categories of fraud produce most of the financial losses.
Analysis
1. Cybercrime is expanding faster than most traditional crimes: The fact that cybercrime cases have tripled in five years shows that cyber offences are presently becoming a significant element of Indian crime. Unlike conventional crimes that require physical proximity, cybercrime can be conducted remotely and at scale, enabling perpetrators to target large numbers of victims simultaneously.
2. Financial losses are concentrated in a small set of fraud categories: As cases of cybercrimes have been on the increase, the monetary losses of digital fraud cases have been increasing at a higher rate. The fact that the number of reported financial losses has increased 40 times in 4 years indicates that cybercrime has a very high economic impact.
3. Complaint volumes and financial damage follow different patterns: When comparing complaints and financial losses, it is evident that cyber fraud losses are unevenly distributed across types of incidents. Most of the prevalent scams reported, including phishing or OTP fraud, involve relatively small transaction values but yield a high portion of complaints. Conversely, fewer categories of fraud, especially investment-based schemes, contribute a significantly higher percentage of total financial losses.
4. Digital financial infrastructure has expanded the attack surface: India’s rapid adoption of digital payment systems, mobile banking and digital financial systems has dramatically increased the number of potential victims of cybercriminals. The scale of online transactions creates new vulnerabilities that organised cybercrime networks take advantage of.
5. Reporting improvements reveal previously hidden crime: The expansion of national reporting systems has enhanced the transparency in the trends of cybercrime. The increase in the number of complaints recorded is partially due to improved reporting systems and not necessarily to the increased criminal activity, meaning that previous data might have understated the magnitude of cyber fraud.
Recommendations
1. Move from reactive policing to proactive cyber-risk monitoring: The conventional models of policing focus on investigation of crimes that have already taken place. With such a magnitude and pace of cyber fraud, India should have systems that are designed to detect and prevent the fraud at its early stages, such as real-time observation of suspicious patterns in transactions by financial institutions.
2. Strengthen financial intelligence sharing across institutions: There are a lot of instances of cyber fraud that use more than one bank, payment system, and telecommunication provider. To detect new networks of fraud sooner, it can be suggested to establish more information-sharing measures between the financial institution and law enforcement agencies.
3. Target organised cyber fraud networks rather than individual incidents: Many digital scams operate through organised networks that coordinate phishing, mule accounts, and fake payment channels. The solution in regard to this involves dismantling these networks through investigative procedures instead of treating incidents on a case-by-case basis.
4. Improve recovery mechanisms for stolen funds: The recovery of the funds lost is one of the most difficult issues in cases of cyber fraud. Expanding systems such as the Citizen Financial Cyber Fraud Reporting and Management System (CFCFRMS) can improve the speed at which fraudulent transactions are frozen or reversed.
5. Strengthen digital financial literacy: A significant percentage of cyber frauds are based on social engineering methods that take advantage of user behaviour as opposed to technical weaknesses. Victimisation can be greatly reduced through specific public awareness efforts on typical scam schemes.
Conclusion
India’s experience illustrates a broader global trend: as economies digitise, crime increasingly follows the flow of digital money. While cybercrime incidents are rising steadily, the much faster growth in financial losses suggests that cybercriminals are becoming more organised, technologically sophisticated, and economically motivated.
References:
- https://indianexpress.com/article/india/indians-lost-rs-53000-crore-fraud-cheating-cases-six-years-maharashtra-2025-10452185/
- https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2226441®=3&lang=2 -
- https://www.ncrb.gov.in/crime-in-india.html
- https://i4c.mha.gov.in/index.aspx
- https://i4c.mha.gov.in/index.aspx
Introduction
Digital arrest scams operate by fraudsters convincing individuals that they are under official scrutiny, often through fabricated notices, video calls, and staged procedures. The harm is not just technical, it is psychological. It works because it feels real.
It is in this context that the Central Bureau of Investigation has introduced ABHAY, an AI based chatbot intended to help individuals verify whether a notice issued in the name of the agency is genuine or not. At one level, this is a simple verification tool. But on closer inspection, it reflects a deeper shift in how cyber threats are being understood and dealt with.
Understanding ABHAY as a Public Interface
ABHAY is designed as a citizen facing mechanism. A person who receives a suspicious communication can use the tool to check its authenticity. This becomes particularly relevant in situations where individuals are pressured into immediate compliance.
What stands out here is the timing. Traditional responses to cybercrime begin after harm has occurred. Complaints are filed, investigations begin, and then some form of remedy follows. ABHAY, however, operates before that stage. It intervenes at the point where a person is still deciding whether to believe what they have received.
“The AI-powered notice verification chatbot, ABHAY, will allow the public to verify the genuineness of a notice purportedly issued by the CBI. In the context of digital arrest frauds, this provides a much required tool for the citizens,” a CBI spokesperson said.
While this may seem like a small shift, but it changes the logic of response. It introduces verification as a first step, rather than enforcement as a later one. Verification tools aim to interrupt that process at a preventive stage. At the same time, their effectiveness depends on awareness along with the precision and functionality of the ABHAY AI. A tool cannot assist if it is not known or trusted. This places some responsibility on institutions to ensure that such initiatives are communicated clearly and remain accessible.
Digital Arrest Scams and the Problem of Legitimacy
Digital arrest scams depend on imitation and make-believe; all tied up with instilling fear through social engineering. Fraudsters replicate the form and language of legal authority. They even use official looking documents, adopt institutional identities, and often create a controlled environment where the victim feels watched and isolated.
The law usually assumes that a reasonable person can distinguish between genuine and fake communication. But in these cases, that assumption begins to weaken. The more convincing the imitation, the harder it becomes to question it.
ABHAY attempts to address this very gap. It does not investigate or punish, it simply verifies. In doing so, it restores a basic distinction that has become blurred. The distinction between lawful authority and its digital imitation.
Legal Context and Emerging Questions
From a legal perspective, this development sits slightly outside conventional frameworks. Under the Information Technology Act, 2000, offences such as cheating by personation and identity misuse are recognized, but the emphasis is on post facto liability. Similarly, consumer protection law addresses misleading conduct after it has affected consumers.
ABHAY operates at an earlier stage. It functions in what may be called a pre liability space.
This raises certain questions, even if they are not immediately visible. When a state agency provides an AI based verification tool, what is the nature of reliance that can be placed on it. If an individual acts based on its output, does that create any expectation of accuracy or responsibility. These are not yet settled issues, but they are likely to become relevant as such tools become more common.
Conclusion
ABHAY reflects a subtle but important shift in approach. By allowing individuals to verify authenticity at the moment of interaction, it introduces a form of prevention and protection that is immediate and practical. At the same time, it opens up questions around reliability, accountability, and long-term integration of such tools into legal frameworks. These questions will need attention as similar technologies are adopted more widely.
For now, ABHAY represents an early attempt to respond to a changing problem. One where trust itself has become a site of vulnerability.
References
Executive Summary:
In the age of virtuality, misinformation and misleading techniques shape the macula of the internet, and these threaten human safety and well-being. Recently, an alarming fake information has surfaced, intended to provide a fake Government subsidy scheme with the name of Indian Post. This serves criminals, who attack people's weaknesses, laying them off with proposals of receiving help in exchange for info. In this informative blog, we take a deep dive into one of the common schemes of fraud during this time. We will go through the stages involved which illustrates how one is deceived and offer practical tips to avoid the fall.
Introduction:
Digital communication reaches individuals faster, and as a result, misinformation and mails have accelerated their spread globally. People, therefore, are susceptible to online scams as they add credibility to phenomena. In India, the recently increased fake news draws its target with the deceptive claims of being a subsidy from the Government mainly through the Indian post. These fraudulent schemes frequently are spread via social networks and messaging platforms, influence trust of the individual’s in respectable establishments to establish fraud and collect private data.
Understanding the Claim:
There is a claim circulating on the behalf of the Government at the national level of a great subsidy of $1066 for deserving residents. The individual will be benefited with the subsidy when they complete the questionnaire they have received through social media. The questionnaire may have been designed to steal the individual’s confidential information by way of taking advantage of naivety and carelessness.
The Deceptive Journey Unveiled:
Bogus Offer Presentation: The scheme often appeals to people, by providing a misleading message or a commercial purposely targeted at convincing them to act immediately by instilling the sense of an urgent need. Such messages usually combine the mood of persuasion and highly evaluative material to create an illusion of being authentic.
Questionnaire Requirement: After the visitors land on attractive content material they are directed to fill in the questionnaire which is supposedly required for processing the economic assistance. This questionnaire requests for non private information in their nature.
False Sense of Urgency: Simultaneously, in addition to the stress-causing factor of it being a fake news, even the false deadline may be brought out to push in the technique of compliance. This data collection is intended to put people under pressure and influence them to make the information transfer that immediate without thorough examination.
Data Harvesting Tactics: Despite the financial help actually serving, you might be unaware but lies beneath it is a vile motive, data harvesting. The collection of facts through questionnaires may become something priceless for scammers that they can use for a good while to profit from identity theft, financial crimes and other malicious means.
Analysis Highlights:
- It is important to note that at this particular point, there has not been any official declaration or a proper confirmation of an offer made by the India Post or from the Government. So, people must be very careful when encountering such messages because they are often employed as lures in phishing attacks or misinformation campaigns. Before engaging or transmitting such claims, it is always advisable to authenticate the information from trustworthy sources in order to protect oneself online and prevent the spread of wrongful information
- The campaign is hosted on a third party domain instead of any official Government Website, this raised suspicion. Also the domain has been registered in very recent times.
- Domain Name: ccn-web[.]buzz
- Registry Domain ID: D6073D14AF8D9418BBB6ADE18009D6866-GDREG
- Registrar WHOIS Server: whois[.]namesilo[.]com
- Registrar URL: www[.]namesilo[.]com
- Updated Date: 2024-02-27T06:17:21Z
- Creation Date: 2024-02-11T03:23:08Z
- Registry Expiry Date: 2025-02-11T03:23:08Z
- Registrar: NameSilo, LLC
- Name Server: tegan[.]ns[.]cloudflare[.]com
- Name Server: nikon[.]ns[.]cloudflare[.]com
Note: Cybercriminal used Cloudflare technology to mask the actual IP address of the fraudulent website.
CyberPeace Advisory:
Verification and Vigilance: It makes complete sense in this case that you should be cautious and skeptical. Do not fall prey to this criminal act. Examine the arguments made and the facts provided by either party and consult credible sources before disclosures are made.
Official Channels: Governments usually invoke the use of reliable channels which can as well be by disseminating subsidies and assistance programs through official websites and the legal channels. Take caution for schemes that are not following the protocols previously established.
Educational Awareness: Providing awareness through education and consciousness about on-line scams and the approaches which are fraudulent has to be considered a primary requirement. Through empowering individuals with capabilities and targets we, as a collective, can be armed with information that will prevent erroneous scheme spreading.
Reporting and Action: In a case of mission suspicious and fraudulent images, let them understand immediately by making the authorities and necessary organizations alert. Your swift actions do not only protect yourself but also help others avoid the costs of related security compromises.
Conclusion:
The rise of the ‘Indian Post Countrywide - government subsidy fake news’ poses a stern warning of the present time that the dangers within the virtual ecosystem are. The art of being wise and sharp in terms of scams always reminds us to show a quick reaction to the hacks and try to do the things that we should identify as per the CyberPeace advisories; thereby, we will contribute to a safer Cyberspace for everyone. Likewise, the ability to critically judge, and remain alert, is important to help defeat the variety of tricks offenders use to mislead you online.
