#FactCheck: Israel Apologizes to Iran’ Video Is AI-Generated

Before you take that next sip of your chai latte at Starbucks, you're about to see Artificial Intelligence (AI) in your tea. Yes you heard it right, but relax, you don't need to put the cup down, because  it's not blended in like a new masala and nobody's adding AI as an ingredient. But AI will be deciding how much stock gets ordered, when the machine needs a service call, how the whole backend of your favourite coffee chain runs.

Here's what's actually going on. Starbucks has been quietly building its own AI to replace the systems Oracle, Microsoft, and IBM used to run for it, for the services such as inventory, equipment management, even the point-of-sale software every outlet depends on. In short: Starbucks decided it does not want to outsource its backend anymore. It wants to build the brain itself.

Sounds fascinating on the surface. A coffee company doing its own AI R&D, right? Except dig one layer deeper, and it stops being cool and starts being a conundrum. Here's the actual link: companies like Starbucks are Indian IT's bread and butter. This is literally the business model, global companies pay Indian IT firms like TCS, HCL, Infosys, Wipro to run exactly this kind of backend work: inventory systems, equipment management, point-of-sale software, IT infrastructure. That's what pays the salaries of roughly 6 million people employed by India's outsourcing industry. 

However, recently, this workforce has been shrinking rather than growing. TCS, the largest player in the industry, reported just 0.4 percent revenue growth in the quarter after stripping out currency fluctuations, its slowest expansion in a year, while its workforce shrank by around 3 percent over the past year to about 594,000 employees. At smaller rival HCL Technologies, sales actually slipped 0.5 percent quarter on quarter. Company wide, TCS let go of over 23,000 employees in FY26 alone, citing its pivot toward an AI first services model and reduced bench requirements per client engagement, with a steep net decline of over 11,000 employees in the most recent quarter alone.

AI's impact on India's IT industry and workforce

India's IT sector employs close to 6 million people, and a large share of that workforce has built careers around exactly the kind of work now being absorbed by AI: inventory systems, equipment monitoring, point of sale software, and other repetitive backend operations. As more global clients explore building these capabilities in house, the demand for large teams doing routine maintenance work is likely to shrink. This does not mean mass job losses overnight, but it does suggest a shift in what kind of talent gets hired and retained. Entry level, process driven roles may see slower growth, while demand rises for professionals who can design, audit, and govern AI systems rather than simply maintain legacy software. For India's IT workforce, the challenge is less about competing with AI and more about repositioning around it, moving up the value chain before the shift forces the decision.

Beyond One Coffee Chain ~ The Real Shift in Global Outsourcing

Starbucks isn't an isolated case; it's a visible example of a much wider recalibration. For two decades, the operating assumption in enterprise software was that building complex, mission-critical systems in-house was too slow, too risky, and too expensive compared to buying from established vendors. AI-assisted coding is chipping away at that assumption. What used to require large, specialised engineering teams and years of development can now be prototyped and iterated on far faster enough that even a company whose core business is coffee, not code, can seriously consider building its own enterprise software stack.

However it is also worth noting that this transition isn't frictionless. Starbucks itself had to walk back an AI-powered inventory-counting tool earlier this year after it produced inaccurate counts, reverting stores to manual counting. Building in-house AI systems is not automatically smoother or more reliable than buying proven software; it just shifts the risk and the learning curve onto the company doing the building.

Disruption and Opportunity, Side by Side

None of this means Indian IT companies can afford to sit still. The Starbucks example offers a legitimate signal that repetitive, well defined, automatable work, especially when powered by in house built AI, genuinely poses some risk or not. But it cannot be seen only through the lens of the industry's obituary. It would be premature to call this a broader decline in terms of IT professionals, companies, or jobs.

The same earnings season also brought TCS's expanded AI mandate with ABB and HCL's $1.14 billion AI driven contract in Europe. Demand has not disappeared, it appears to be evolving from routine maintenance work toward AI native, higher value engagement. 

Whether this becomes a meaningful structural shift or simply another cycle the industry eventually absorbs remains to be seen. What seems clear for now is that the path forward depends less on resisting the shift and more on how quickly the industry chooses to embrace it.

Conclusion 

AI is a double-edged sword. While it challenges the old model of outsourcing via a maintenance and staff augmentation play, it also provides new, high-value services opportunities around AI integration, data infrastructure, and governance-areas where the scale, domain expertise, and global delivery experience that Indian IT has amassed over three decades is essential. Whether India's IT majors will move fast enough to upskill, re-skill, and reposition to ride this wave before the opportunity heads somewhere else, is the question to watch, rather than the survival of one vendor or contract.

‍

Sources

1. Bloomberg Opinion  -  Andy Mukherjee, "You Can't Spell Chai Latte Without AI, and That Will Hurt India.” bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2026-07-14/you-can-t-spell-chai-latte-without-ai-that-will-hurt-india
2. Yahoo Finance /  Vlad Schepkov, "Starbucks Working on AI Tools to Replace Microsoft and IBM Software – Report," July 9, 2026. finance.yahoo.com/technology/ai/articles/starbucks-working-ai-tools-replace-105954159.html
3. Livemint - Andy Mukherjee, "As Starbucks Mixes AI in Chai Latte, What Must IT Players Do?" Mint Curator.
   livemint.com/opinion/online-views/andy-mukherjee-india-it-industry-starbucks-ai-tc-hcl-tech-artificial-intelligence-oracle-microsoft-ibm-11784118723454.html
4. Metaintro, "TCS and Infosys Face an AI Reckoning" https://www.metaintro.com/blog/tcs-infosys-ai-reckoning-millions-it-jobs-2026
5. LayoffTrends, "IT Layoffs India 2026 — TCS, Infosys, Wipro, GCC Jobs" https://layofftrends.com/india.html
6. NiftyTrader, "Hiring Slows at India's Top IT Firms — Net Headcount Falls in 9MFY26" https://www.niftytrader.in/markets/hiring-slows-at-indias-top-it-firms-net-headcount-falls-in-9mfy26-what-it-signals-for-the-sector/
7. TCS official newsroom, "TCS and ABB Sign Multi-Million, Multi-Year Deal to Transform Global Network Operations with AI," tcs.com/who-we-are/newsroom/press-release/tcs-and-abb-sign-multi-million-multi-year-deal-to-transform-global-network-operations-with-ai

‍

Executive Summary

‍

A video clip of Indian Army Chief Upendra Dwivedi is being widely shared across social media platforms with the claim that he criticised the Indian government's policy towards Taliban-ruled Afghanistan. In the viral clip, the Army Chief is allegedly heard saying that India is doing nothing except sending money to the Taliban government due to the Centre’s failed policies.

However, CyberPeace Research Wing research  found the claim to be false. The viral video is a deepfake. In the original footage, General Upendra Dwivedi was speaking about Operation Sindoor and the preparedness of the Indian Armed Forces for a possible “Operation Sindoor 2.0.” He made no remarks regarding the Taliban or the government’s Afghanistan policy.

‍

Claim

‍

An X user named “XaQil” shared the viral video on May 31, 2026, with the caption:“Due to failed policies of the Central Government, India is doing nothing except sending Money to Taliban government. How can money alone do everything?” — Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi.

• https://x.com/in9Zero/status/2060937823516246187 
• https://perma.cc/PT39-N7FR 

‍

‍

‍

Fact Check

‍

In the viral video, General Dwivedi is purportedly heard making remarks about India’s Afghanistan policy, the Taliban, Pakistan, Iran, and India’s diplomatic position. To verify the claim, we searched for the original source of the video. A reverse image search of key frames led us to the authentic footage posted by news agency ANI on its official X account on May 30, 2026.

• https://x.com/ANI/status/2060571216159899988?s=20

‍

‍

In the original video, General Dwivedi was responding to a question about Operation Sindoor. He stated that the operation was still ongoing, hostilities had only paused temporarily, and that the Indian Armed Forces were fully prepared if “Operation Sindoor 2.0” became necessary. 

He also spoke about enhancing coordination among the three services and maintaining operational readiness.”

No part of his statement mentioned the Taliban, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, or criticism of the Central Government. 

Further corroboration came from media reports covering the same event. According to a report published by Navbharat Times on May 30, 2026, General Dwivedi made the remarks during the passing-out parade of the 150th course of the National Defence Academy (NDA), where he attended as the chief guest. He reiterated that the armed forces were fully prepared for “Operation Sindoor 2.0” if required.

• https://navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/state/maharashtra/pune/army-chief-general-upendra-dwivedi-says-armed-forces-are-ready-for-operation-sindoor-2-0-if-needed/articleshow/131407992.cms

‍

‍

Since the content of the viral clip did not match the original statement, we examined it using InVID’s MeVer Deepfake Detector. The tool flagged signs of AI manipulation and indicated that the video had likely been altered. 

‍

Conclusion

‍

Cyber Peace Foundation found that the viral video purportedly showing Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi criticising the Indian government’s policy towards the Taliban is a deepfake.  The Army Chief made no such remarks. The original video was recorded during an NDA event, where he spoke about Operation Sindoor and the preparedness of the Indian Armed Forces for a possible future operation. The viral clip has been manipulated using AI to spread a false narrative.

‍

Introduction

Intricate and winding are the passageways of the modern digital age, a place where the reverberations of truth effortlessly blend, yet hauntingly contrast, with the echoes of falsehood. The latest thread in this fabric of misinformation is a claim that has scurried through the virtual windows of social media platforms, gaining the kind of traction that is both revelatory and alarming of our times. It is a narrative that speaks to the heart of India's cultural and religious fabric—the construction of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya, a project enshrined in the collective consciousness of a nation and steeped in historical significance.

The claim in question, a spectre of misinformation, suggests that the Ram Temple's construction has been covertly shifted 3 kilometres from its original, hallowed ground—the birthplace, as it were, of Lord Ram. This assertion, which spread through the echo chambers of social media, has been bolstered by a screenshot of Google Maps, a digital cartographer that has accidentally become a pawn in this game of truth and deception. The image purports to showcase the location of Ram Mandir as distinct and distant from the site where the Babri Masjid once stood, a claim went viral on social media and has caught the public's reactions.

The Viral Tempest 

In the face of such a viral tempest, IndiaTV's fact-checking arm, IndiaTVFactCheck, has stepped into the fray, wielding the sword of veracity against the Goliath of falsehood. Their investigation into this viral claim was meticulous, a deep dive into the digital representations that have fueled this controversy. Upon examining the viral Google Maps screenshot, they noticed markings at two locations: one labelled as Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Temple and the other as Babri Masjid. The latter, upon closer inspection and with the aid of Google's satellite prowess, was revealed to be the Shri Sita-Ram Birla Temple, a place of worship that stands in quiet dignity, far removed from the contentious whispers of social media.

The truth, as it often does, lay buried beneath layers of user-generated content on Google Maps, where the ability to tag any location with a name has sometimes led to the dissemination of incorrect information. This can be corrected, of course, but not before it has woven itself into the fabric of public discourse. The fact-check by IndiaTV revealed that the location mentioned in the viral screenshot is, indeed, the Shri Sita-Ram Birla Temple and the Ram Temple is being constructed at its original, intended site.

This revelation is not merely a victory for truth over falsehood but also a testament to the resilience of facts in the face of a relentless onslaught of misinformation. It is a reminder that the digital realm, for all its wonders, is also a shadowy theatre where narratives are constructed and deconstructed with alarming ease. The very basis of all the fake narratives that spread around significant events, such as the consecration ceremony of the Ram Temple, is the manipulation of truth, the distortion of reality to serve nefarious ends of spreading misinformation.

Fake Narratives; Misinformation

Consider the elaborate fake narratives spun around the ceremony, where hours have been spent on the internet building a web of deceit. Claims such as 'Mandir wahan nahin banaya gaya' (The temple is not being built at the site of the demolition) and the issuance of new Rs 500 notes for the Ram Mandir were some pieces of misinformation that went viral on social media amid the preparations for the consecration ceremony. These repetitive claims, albeit differently worded, were spread to further a single narrative on the internet, a phenomenon that a study published in Nature said could be attributed to people taking some peripheral cues as signals for truth, which can increase with repetition.

The misinformation incidents surrounding the Ram Temple in Ayodhya are a microcosm of the larger battle between truth and misinformation. The false claims circulating online assert that the ongoing construction is not taking place at the original Babri Masjid site but rather 3 kilometres away. This misinformation, shared widely on social media has been debunked upon closer examination. The claim is based on a screenshot of Google Maps showing two locations: the construction site of the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Temple and another spot labeled 'Babar Masjid permanently closed' situated 3 kilometers away. The assertion questions the legitimacy of demolishing the Babri Masjid if the temple is being built elsewhere. However, a thorough fact-check reveals the claim to be entirely unfounded.

Deep Scrutiny

Upon scrutiny, the screenshot indicates that the second location marked as 'Babar Masjid' is, in fact, the Sita-Ram Birla Temple in Ayodhya. This is verified by comparing the Google Maps satellite image with the actual structure of the Birla Temple. Notably, the viral screenshot misspells 'Babri Masjid' as 'Babar Masjid,' casting doubt on its credibility. Satellite images from Google Earth Pro clearly depict the construction of a temple-like structure at the precise coordinates of the original Babri Masjid demolition site (26°47'43.74'N 82°11'38.77'E). Comparing old and new satellite images further confirms that major construction activities began in 2011, aligning with the initiation of the Ram Temple construction.

Moreover, existing photographs of the Babri Masjid, though challenging to precisely match, share essential structural elements with the current construction site, reinforcing the location as the original site of the mosque. Hence the viral claim that the Ram Temple is being constructed 3 kilometers away from the Babri Masjid site is indubitably false. Evidence from historical photographs, satellite images and google images conclusively refute this misinformation, attesting that the temple construction is indeed taking place at the same location as the original Babri Masjid.

Viral Misinformation: A false claim based on a misleading Google Maps screenshot suggests the Ram Temple construction in Ayodhya has been covertly shifted 3 kilometres away from its original Babri Masjid site.

Fact Check Revealed: IndiaTVFactCheck debunked the misinformation, confirming that the viral screenshot actually showed the Shri Sita-Ram Birla Temple, not the Babri Masjid site. The Ram Temple is indeed being constructed at its original, intended location, exposing the falsehood of the claim.

Conclusion 

The case of the Ram Temple is a pitiful reminder of the power of misinformation and the significance of fact-checking in preserving the integrity of truth. It is a clarion call to question, to uphold the integrity of facts in a world increasingly stymied in the murky waters of falsehoods. Widespread misinformation highlights the critical role of fact-checking in dispelling false narratives. It serves as a reminder of the ongoing battle between truth and misinformation in the digital age, emphasising the importance of upholding the integrity of facts for a more informed society. 

References 

• https://www.indiatvnews.com/fact-check/fact-check-is-ram-temple-being-built-3-km-away-from-the-birthplace-here-truth-behind-viral-claim-2024-01-19-912633
• https://www.thequint.com/news/webqoof/misinformation-spread-around-events-ayodhya-ram-mandir-g20-elections-bharat-jodo-yatra

‍