#FactCheck: Old Nepal Gen-Z Protest Video Falsely Linked to ‘Hindu Nation’ Demonstrations

A photo featuring Indian cricketers Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma is being widely shared on social media. In the image, both players are seen holding a Shivling, with the Kedarnath temple visible in the background. Users sharing the image claim that Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma recently visited Kedarnath.

‍

However, CyberPeace Foundation’s investigation found the claim to be false. Our verification established that the viral image is not real but has been created using Artificial Intelligence (AI) and is being circulated with a misleading narrative.

‍

The Claim

‍

An Instagram user shared the viral image on December 22, 2025, with the caption stating that Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli are in Kedarnath. The post has since been widely reshared by other users, who assumed the image to be authentic. Link, archive link, screenshot:

‍

• https://www.instagram.com/rohitmaurya2888/p/DSkZsWMEixV 
• https://archive.ph/0sJRo 

‍

‍

Fact Check

‍

On closely examining the viral image, the Desk noticed visual inconsistencies suggesting that it may be AI-generated. To verify this, the image was scanned using the AI detection tool HIVE Moderation. According to the results, the image was found to be 99 per cent AI-generated.

‍

‍

Further verification was conducted using another AI detection tool, Sightengine. The analysis revealed that the image was 93 per cent likely to be AI-generated, reinforcing the findings from the previous tool.

‍

Conclusion

‍

CyberPeace Foundation’s research confirms that the viral image claiming Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma visited Kedarnath is fabricated. The image has been generated using AI technology and is being falsely shared on social media as a real photograph.

‍

Introduction

‍

Law grows by confronting its absences, it heals through its own gaps. States often find themselves navigating a shared frontier without a mutual guide or lines of law in an era of expanding digital boundaries and growing cyber damages. The United Nations General Assembly ratified the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime on December 24, 2024, and more than sixty governments were in attendance in the signing ceremony on 24th & 25th October this year, marking a moment of institutional regeneration and global commitment. 

‍

A new Lexicon for Global Order

The old liberal order is being strained by growing nationalism, economic fracturing, populism, and great-power competition as often emphasised in the works of scholars like G. John Iken berry and John Mearsheimer. Multilateral arrangements become more brittle in such circumstances. Therefore, the new cybercrimes convention represents not only a legal tool but also a resurgence of international promise, a significant win for collective governance in an uncertain time. It serves as a reminder that institutions can be rebuilt even after they have been damaged. 

‍

In Discussion: The Fabric of the Digital Polis

‍

The digital sphere has become a contentious area. On the one hand, the US and its allies support stakeholder governance, robust individual rights, and open data flows. On the other hand, nations like China and Russia describe a “post-liberal cyber order” based on state mediation, heavily regulated flows, and sovereignty. Instead of focusing on ideological dichotomies, India, which is positioned as both a rising power and a voice of the Global South, has offered a viewpoint based on supply-chain security, data localisation, and capacity creation. Thus, rather than being merely a regulation, the treaty arises from a framework of strategic recalibration. 

‍

What Changed & Why it Matters

‍

There have been regional cybercrime accords up to this point, such as the Budapest Convention. The goal of this new international convention, which is accessible to all UN members, is to standardise definitions, evidence sharing and investigation instruments. 72 states signed the Hanoi signature event in October, 2025, demonstrating an unparalleled level of scope and determination. In addition to establishing structures for cooperative investigations, extradition, and the sharing of electronic evidence, it requires signatories to criminalise acts such as fraud, unlawful access to systems, data interference, and online child exploitation. 

For the first time, a legally obligatory global architecture aims to harmonise cross-border evidence flows, mutual legal assistance, and national procedural laws. Cybercrime offers genuine promise for community defence at a time when it is no longer incidental but existential, attacks on hospitals, schools and infrastructure are now common, according to the Global Observatory.

‍

Holding the Line: India’s Deliberate Path in the Age of Cyber Multilateralism 

‍

India takes a contemplative rather than a reluctant stance towards the UN Cybercrime Treaty. Though it played an active role during the drafting sessions and lent its voice to the shaping of global cyber norms, New Delhi is yet to sign the convention. Subtle but intentional, the reluctance suggests a more comprehensive reflection, an evaluation of how international obligations correspond with domestic constitutional protections, especially the right to privacy upheld by the Supreme Court in Puttaswamy v. UOI (2017). 

Prudence is the reason for this halt. Policy circles speculate that the government is still assessing the treaty’s consequences for national data protection, surveillance regimes, and territorial sovereignty. Officials have not provided explicit justifications for India’s refusal to join. India’s position has frequently been characterised by striking a careful balance between digital sovereignty and taking part in cooperative international regimes. In earlier negotiations, India had even proposed including clauses to penalise “offensive messages” on social media, echoing the erstwhile Section 66A of the IT Act, 2000, but the suggestion found little international traction. 

Advocates for digital rights such as Raman Jit Singh Chima of Access Now have warned that ensuring that the treaty’s implementation upholds constitutional privacy principles may be necessary for India to eventually endorse it. He contends that the treaty’s wording might not entirely meet India’s legal requirements in the absence of such voluntary pledges. 

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres praised the agreement as “a powerful, legally binding instrument to strengthen our collective defences against “cybercrime” during its signing in Hanoi. The issue for India is to make sure that multilateral collaboration develops in accordance with constitutional values rather than to reject that vision. Therefore, the path forward is one of assertion rather than absence, careful march towards a cyber future that protects freedom and sovereignty. 

‍

Sources: 

• https://www.icwa.in/show_content.php?lang=1&level=3&ls_id=12244&lid=7470 
• https://www.medianama.com/2025/10/223-72-nations-un-first-cybercrime-treaty-india-abstains-privacy/ ‍
• https://therecord.media/us-declines-signing-cybercrime-treaty

Introduction

‍

युद्धे सूर्यास्ते युध्यन्तः समाप्तयन्ति, In ancient times, after the day’s battle had ended and the sun had set, warriors would lay down their arms and rest, allowing their minds and bodies to recover before facing the next challenge, and giving warriors time to rest and prepare mentally and physically for the next day. Today, as we remain endlessly connected to work through screens and notifications, the Right to Disconnect bill seeks to restore that same rhythm of rest and renewal in the digital age. By giving individuals the space to disconnect, it aims to restores balance, protects psychological health, and acknowledges that human resilience is not limitless, even in a world dominated by technology.

The Right to Disconnect Bill, 2025, was recently introduced in the lower house of Parliament during the winter session, which began on 1st December 2025, as a private member’s bill by Ms. Supriya Sule, Lok Sabha MP.

‍

Understanding the Psychology Behind the Proposed Right to disconnect Bill

‍

The purpose of this law is based on neuroscience for humans. When workers are always in a state of being "always on", the situation of their bodies gets to the chronic stress response state where they are getting overwhelmed with cortisol, which is the main human stress hormone. The constant vigilance that the body and mind are under forces the nervous system into always being in a state of sympathetic activation, while depriving it of the restorative (parasympathetic) states that are necessary for genuine recovery. Neuroscience studies show that 96% of heavy users of technology suffer from anxiety and lack of sleep due to technology. This phenomenon is known medically as "bytemares." The brain tries to attend to several things at once, and this way its cognitive capacity becomes thinner, so there is a reduction in focus, productivity is decreased, and the stress level is increased considerably.

Increasingly, the mental suffering that people get through is not only the physical and psychological aspects of it. The digital fatigue generated by the "always-on culture" getting chronic takes its toll on the emotional capacity of the staff, interrupts their sleep cycles (particularly depriving them of REM sleep), and leads to lower melatonin secretion.

Employees in such environments have a 23% increased chance of suffering from burnout, which the World Health Organisation defines as an occupational syndrome consisting of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and downgrading of performance. Mental health is the silent destruction that goes on without anyone noticing; the individuals who are affected show productive performance while their neuroendocrine systems are dying little by little.

Hence, the intent of the Indian legislature is clear, which is to prioritize the human dimension, allowing employees, the warriors of the digital age, to pause and recover, fostering work‑life balance without compromising commitment or productivity, and reflecting a thoughtful, humane approach in the modern technology driven world. 

The proposed Right to Disconnect Bill takes position as a law that can greatly help with the mental health of employees and therefore keep them healthy. The bill allows employees to legally disconnect from electronic communication related to their jobs outside of the working hours set by the employer; this way, it recognises more or less that the human brain was never meant to be always connected.

‍

The Need for Digital Detox from a Scientific Perspective

‍

Digital detoxification is the process through which the brain resets its dopamine receptors, hence stopping the process of instant gratification that is constantly reinforced through notifications. The employees who cut off their connection can focus better, remain emotionally stable, and lead healthier lives, the effect of which is measurable. Not only on single persons, but also the World Health Organisation, through its studies, has declared that mental health interventions in workplaces can yield a return of 4:1 on investment through increased productivity and decline in absenteeism.

‍

Digital Detox: Structured Disconnection, Not Digital Rejection

‍

One of the most important aspects of the proposed bill is the acknowledgment of digital detox as a supportive tool. However, it is very important to note that digital detox does not mean completely cutting off technology. It is the rule-based disengagement that brings back cognitive balance. Measures like limiting notifications after work hours, protecting weekends and holidays from routine communication and creating offline time zones facilitate the brain's resetting process. Psychological studies associate such practices with better concentration, emotional control, sleep quality and finally productivity in the long run. The initiative of having digital detox centres and offering counselling services is an indication that the issue of overexposure is not just a matter of personal lack of discipline, but rather a problem of modern working designs.

‍

Positioning Mental Well-Being as Core 

‍

The fundamental aspect of the bill is based on the constitutional assurance provided by Article 21 (Constitution of India), the Right to Life and personal Liberty, which has been interpreted by the courts to cover health of mind and body as well as time for leisure. This law reform grants a right to not be available at work, which means that employers will not be able to require constant availability at work without suffering legal consequences. The Right to Disconnect Bill finally illustrates society's unanimity that, amidst our digital age, mental well-being protection is no more a nice-to-have it is a must-have. The bill permits the guarding of the recovery periods, and at the same time, it recognises that the productivity that is sustainable comes from employees who are rested and mentally healthy, not from the constantly depleted workforce in the digital chains.

‍

The psychological Rationale

‍

Psychological analysis indicates that this always-on condition impacts productivity in measurable ways. The human brain may get overloaded to distinguish between important and unimportant information due to the uninterrupted flow of alerts and communications. The whole process leads to a situation, continuous exposure to alerts diminishes the ability to notice the really important events thus allowing the critical ones to go unnoticed. Burnout results as a natural consequence. Research shows that the psychological state resulting from digital overstimulation is anxiety, sleep problems, tiredness, and inability to focus. 

‍

Work Culture in the Cybersecurity Realm and Analysis of the Right to Disconnect

‍

Although every sector today demands high productivity and significant commitment from its workforce, the Cybersecurity professionals, IT engineers, SOC analysts, incident responders, cyberseucrity researchers, cyber lawyers and digital operations teams are often engage in 24x7 loop because they deal with uniquely critical responsibilities, if ignored or delayed, can compromise sensitive systems, data integrity, and national security. 

It is notable that the flow of activities has been silently but significantly changing the paradigm. Availability has replaced accountability, and often responsiveness is regarded as performance. The “on duty” and “off duty” line blurs when a client escalation or a suspected breach alert calls the phone at midnight. This way, an unspoken rule develops that the worker has to be reachable irrespective of the time as being reachable has become part of the job.

In India, the 48-hour work week that is already among the world's most demanding has been made even more intense by digital connectivity. The work intensity of remote and hybrid models has further crossed spatial and temporal boundaries producing a psychologically endless workday. Hence, the cyber workforce lives in a constant state of low-grade alertness, i.e., never fully sleeping, never fully offline. For professionals working in cyber security, this issue of wellbeing is not just a personal issue but also a business issue. Mental fatigue may lead to poor decision making, slower response time in case of incidents, and more errors being made unintentionally  by people.

Hence comes the relevance of the proposed Right to Disconnect bill, Implementing it in the cybersecurity realm may require employers to plan for additional task forces so that productivity remains unaffected, while ensuring that employees receive the rest and balance they need. This approach not only protects mental well‑being but also creates opportunities for new roles, distributes workloads fairly, and strengthens the overall resilience and efficiency of the organization.

‍

Legislature Intent - The Right to Disconnect as a preventive control

‍

In this scenario, the Right to Disconnect Bill, 2025, which was presented in the Lok Sabha as a private member's bill, can be seen as a precautionary measure in the digital risk ecosystem instead of merely as a employee welfare initiative. It intends to create legally enforceable lines of demarcation between the demands of a job and one's personal life. The bill provisions, like the right not to answer work calls and texts after office hours, protection from being fired, pay for overtime, and agreed-upon emergency protocols, are all tools to set new norms rather than to impose restrictions on the output. 

This can be seen as security logic that has been established in the cyber governance sphere. Even the best systems require planned downtimes for patching, upgrading, and recovery. Humans cannot be treated differently. Loss of operation without recovery will only increase the likelihood of failure. The Right to Disconnect works as a human-layer security, which reduces the risk of incidents caused by fatigue and burnout among employees.

‍

The Legislative Recognition of Human Needs

‍

The Right to Disconnect Bill is a landmark change of thinking, moving from the perception of disconnection as unprofessional to the acknowledgement of it as a basic requirement for human dignity and health. The Indian legislation, which was passed through a private member's bill, clearly defines the limits of professional and personal time. By providing the employees with the legal right to disconnect, the bill affirms what psychological science has been telling us for a long time: people need real breaks to be at their best.

‍

Conclusion

‍

The Proposed Right to Disconnect Bill, 2025, is a progressive move in law, which, among others confirms that a digital world, constant connectivity may undermines both individual health and company/orgnisation’s buisness continuity. A balanced approach is essential, with clearly agreed-upon emergency norms to guide situations where employees may need to work extra hours in a reasonable and lawful manner. It recognises that people are the backbone of the digital ecosystem and need time off to work effectively and securely. In a connected economy, protecting mental bandwidth is as crucial as protecting technical networks, making the Right to Disconnect a key element of sustainable resilience. 

From a cybersecurity perspective, no secure digital future can emerge from exhausted minds. A strong digital and cyber‑India will have laws like the Right to Disconnect Bill, signaling a shift in policy thinking. This law moves the burden from individuals having to adapt to always-on technologies onto systems, organisations, and governance structures to respect human limits. By recognising mental well-being as an essential factor of employee’s wellbeing, the bill reinforces that resilient work ecosystems depend not only on robust infrastructure and controls but also on well-rested, focused, and secure individuals.

‍

References

• https://www.shankariasparliament.com/blogs/pdf/right-to-disconnect-bill-2025
• https://ijlr.iledu.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/V5I653.pdf
• https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/news/no-calls-and-emails-after-office-hours-right-to-disconnect-bill-introduced-in-lok-sabha-to-set-workplace-boundaries/articleshow/125806984.cms
• https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/what-is-right-to-disconnect-bill-introduced-in-lok-sabha-and-can-it-clear-parliament-101765025582585.html

‍