#FactCheck -AI-Generated Video Falsely Shows PM Modi Praising Christianity
Executive Summary:
A video of Prime Minister Narendra Modi is going viral across multiple social media platforms. In the clip, PM Modi is purportedly heard praising Christianity and stating that only Jesus Christ can lead people to heaven.Several users are sharing and commenting on the video, believing it to be genuine. The CyberPeace researched the viral claim and found it to be false. The circulating video has been created using artificial intelligence (AI).
Claim:
On January 29, 2026, a Facebook user named ‘Khaju Damor’ posted the viral video of PM Modi. The post gained traction, with many users sharing and commenting on it as if it were authentic. (Links and archived versions provided)

Fact Check:
As part of our research , we first closely examined the viral video. Upon careful observation, several inconsistencies were noticed. The Prime Minister’s facial expressions and hand movements appeared unnatural. The lip-sync and overall visual presentation also raised suspicions about the clip being digitally manipulated. To verify this further, we analyzed the video using the AI detection tool Hive Moderation. The tool’s analysis indicated a 99% probability that the video was AI-generated.

To independently confirm the findings, we also ran the clip through another detection platform, Undetectable.ai. Its analysis likewise indicated a very high likelihood that the video was created using artificial intelligence.

Conclusion:
Our research confirms that the viral video of Prime Minister Narendra Modi praising Christianity and making the alleged statement about heaven is fake. The clip has been generated using AI tools and does not depict a real statement made by the Prime Minister.
Related Blogs

Pretext
On 20th October 2022, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) imposed a penalty of Rs. 1,337.76 crores on Google for abusing its dominant position in multiple markets in the Android Mobile device ecosystem, apart from issuing cease and desist orders. The CCI also directed Google to modify its conduct within a defined timeline. Smart mobile devices need an operating system (OS) to run applications (apps) and programs. Android is one such mobile operating system that Google acquired in 2005. In the instant matter, the CCI examined various practices of Google w.r.t. licensing of this Android mobile operating system and various proprietary mobile applications of Google (e.g., Play Store, Google Search, Google Chrome, YouTube, etc.).
The Issue
Google was found to be misusing its dominant position in the tech market, and the same was the reason behind the penalty. Google argued about the competitive constraints being faced from Apple. In relation to understanding the extent of competition between Google’s Android ecosystem and Apple’s iOS ecosystem, the CCI noted the differences in the two business models, which affect the underlying incentives of business decisions. Apple’s business is primarily based on a vertically integrated smart device ecosystem that focuses on the sale of high-end smart devices with state-of-the-art software components. In contrast, Google’s business was found to be driven by the ultimate intent of increasing users on its platforms so that they interact with its revenue-earning service, i.e., online searches, which directly affects the sale of online advertising services by Google. It was seen that google had created a dominant position among the android phone manufacturers as they were made to have a set of google apps preinstalled in the device to increase the user’s dependency on google services. The CCI felt that Google had created a dominant position to which they replied that the same operations are done by Apple as well, to which the commission responded that apple is a phone and app manufacturer and they have Apple-owned apps in Apple devices only, but Google here in had made a pseudo mandate for android manufactures to have the google apps pre-installed which is, in turn, a possible way of disrupting the market equilibrium and violative of market practices. The CCI imposed a penalty of Rs. 1,337.76 for abusing its dominant position in multiple markets in India, CCI delineated the following five relevant markets in the present matter –

- The market for licensable OS for smart mobile devices in India
- The market for app store for Android smart mobile OS in India
- The market for general web search services in India
- The market for non-OS specific mobile web browsers in India
- The market for online video hosting platforms (OVHP) in India.
Supreme Courts Opinion
In October 2022, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) ruled that Google, owned by Alphabet Inc, exploited its dominant position in Android and told it to remove restrictions on device makers, including those related to the pre-installation of apps and ensuring exclusivity of its search. Google lost a challenge in the Supreme Court to block the directives, as the learned court refused to put a stay on the imposed penalty, further giving seven days to comply. The Supreme Court has said a lower tribunal—where Google first challenged the Android directives—can continue to hear the company’s appeal and must rule by March 31.
Counterpoint Research estimates that about 97% of 600 million smartphones in India run on Android. Apple has just a 3% share. Hoping to block the implementation of the CCI directives, Google challenged the CCI order in the Supreme Court by warning it could stall the growth of the Android ecosystem. It also said it would be forced to alter arrangements with more than 1,100 device manufacturers and thousands of app developers if the directives kick in. Google has been concerned about India’s decision as the steps are seen as more sweeping than those imposed in the European Commission’s 2018 ruling. There it was fined for putting in place what the Commission called unlawful restrictions on Android mobile device makers. Google is still challenging the record $4.3 billion fine in that case. In Europe, Google made changes later, including letting Android device users pick their default search engine, and said device makers would be able to license the Google mobile application suite separately from the Google Search App or the Chrome browser.
Conclusion
As the world goes deeper into cyberspace, the big tech companies have more control over the industry and the markets, but the same should not turn into anarchy in the global markets. The Tech giants need to be made aware that compliance is the utmost duty for all companies, and enforcement of the law of the land will be maintained no matter what. Earlier India lacked policies and legislation to govern cyberspace, but in the recent proactive stance by the govt, a lot of new bills have been tabled, one of them being the Intermediary Rules 2021, which has laid down the obligations nand duties of the companies by setting up an intermediary in the country. Such bills coupled with such crucial judgments on tech giants will act as a test and barrier for other tech companies who try to flaunt the rules and avoid compliance.

Introduction
युद्धे सूर्यास्ते युध्यन्तः समाप्तयन्ति, In ancient times, after the day’s battle had ended and the sun had set, warriors would lay down their arms and rest, allowing their minds and bodies to recover before facing the next challenge, and giving warriors time to rest and prepare mentally and physically for the next day. Today, as we remain endlessly connected to work through screens and notifications, the Right to Disconnect bill seeks to restore that same rhythm of rest and renewal in the digital age. By giving individuals the space to disconnect, it aims to restores balance, protects psychological health, and acknowledges that human resilience is not limitless, even in a world dominated by technology.
The Right to Disconnect Bill, 2025, was recently introduced in the lower house of Parliament during the winter session, which began on 1st December 2025, as a private member’s bill by Ms. Supriya Sule, Lok Sabha MP.
Understanding the Psychology Behind the Proposed Right to disconnect Bill
The purpose of this law is based on neuroscience for humans. When workers are always in a state of being "always on", the situation of their bodies gets to the chronic stress response state where they are getting overwhelmed with cortisol, which is the main human stress hormone. The constant vigilance that the body and mind are under forces the nervous system into always being in a state of sympathetic activation, while depriving it of the restorative (parasympathetic) states that are necessary for genuine recovery. Neuroscience studies show that 96% of heavy users of technology suffer from anxiety and lack of sleep due to technology. This phenomenon is known medically as "bytemares." The brain tries to attend to several things at once, and this way its cognitive capacity becomes thinner, so there is a reduction in focus, productivity is decreased, and the stress level is increased considerably.
Increasingly, the mental suffering that people get through is not only the physical and psychological aspects of it. The digital fatigue generated by the "always-on culture" getting chronic takes its toll on the emotional capacity of the staff, interrupts their sleep cycles (particularly depriving them of REM sleep), and leads to lower melatonin secretion.
Employees in such environments have a 23% increased chance of suffering from burnout, which the World Health Organisation defines as an occupational syndrome consisting of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and downgrading of performance. Mental health is the silent destruction that goes on without anyone noticing; the individuals who are affected show productive performance while their neuroendocrine systems are dying little by little.
Hence, the intent of the Indian legislature is clear, which is to prioritize the human dimension, allowing employees, the warriors of the digital age, to pause and recover, fostering work‑life balance without compromising commitment or productivity, and reflecting a thoughtful, humane approach in the modern technology driven world.
The proposed Right to Disconnect Bill takes position as a law that can greatly help with the mental health of employees and therefore keep them healthy. The bill allows employees to legally disconnect from electronic communication related to their jobs outside of the working hours set by the employer; this way, it recognises more or less that the human brain was never meant to be always connected.
The Need for Digital Detox from a Scientific Perspective
Digital detoxification is the process through which the brain resets its dopamine receptors, hence stopping the process of instant gratification that is constantly reinforced through notifications. The employees who cut off their connection can focus better, remain emotionally stable, and lead healthier lives, the effect of which is measurable. Not only on single persons, but also the World Health Organisation, through its studies, has declared that mental health interventions in workplaces can yield a return of 4:1 on investment through increased productivity and decline in absenteeism.
Digital Detox: Structured Disconnection, Not Digital Rejection
One of the most important aspects of the proposed bill is the acknowledgment of digital detox as a supportive tool. However, it is very important to note that digital detox does not mean completely cutting off technology. It is the rule-based disengagement that brings back cognitive balance. Measures like limiting notifications after work hours, protecting weekends and holidays from routine communication and creating offline time zones facilitate the brain's resetting process. Psychological studies associate such practices with better concentration, emotional control, sleep quality and finally productivity in the long run. The initiative of having digital detox centres and offering counselling services is an indication that the issue of overexposure is not just a matter of personal lack of discipline, but rather a problem of modern working designs.
Positioning Mental Well-Being as Core
The fundamental aspect of the bill is based on the constitutional assurance provided by Article 21 (Constitution of India), the Right to Life and personal Liberty, which has been interpreted by the courts to cover health of mind and body as well as time for leisure. This law reform grants a right to not be available at work, which means that employers will not be able to require constant availability at work without suffering legal consequences. The Right to Disconnect Bill finally illustrates society's unanimity that, amidst our digital age, mental well-being protection is no more a nice-to-have it is a must-have. The bill permits the guarding of the recovery periods, and at the same time, it recognises that the productivity that is sustainable comes from employees who are rested and mentally healthy, not from the constantly depleted workforce in the digital chains.
The psychological Rationale
Psychological analysis indicates that this always-on condition impacts productivity in measurable ways. The human brain may get overloaded to distinguish between important and unimportant information due to the uninterrupted flow of alerts and communications. The whole process leads to a situation, continuous exposure to alerts diminishes the ability to notice the really important events thus allowing the critical ones to go unnoticed. Burnout results as a natural consequence. Research shows that the psychological state resulting from digital overstimulation is anxiety, sleep problems, tiredness, and inability to focus.
Work Culture in the Cybersecurity Realm and Analysis of the Right to Disconnect
Although every sector today demands high productivity and significant commitment from its workforce, the Cybersecurity professionals, IT engineers, SOC analysts, incident responders, cyberseucrity researchers, cyber lawyers and digital operations teams are often engage in 24x7 loop because they deal with uniquely critical responsibilities, if ignored or delayed, can compromise sensitive systems, data integrity, and national security.
It is notable that the flow of activities has been silently but significantly changing the paradigm. Availability has replaced accountability, and often responsiveness is regarded as performance. The “on duty” and “off duty” line blurs when a client escalation or a suspected breach alert calls the phone at midnight. This way, an unspoken rule develops that the worker has to be reachable irrespective of the time as being reachable has become part of the job.
In India, the 48-hour work week that is already among the world's most demanding has been made even more intense by digital connectivity. The work intensity of remote and hybrid models has further crossed spatial and temporal boundaries producing a psychologically endless workday. Hence, the cyber workforce lives in a constant state of low-grade alertness, i.e., never fully sleeping, never fully offline. For professionals working in cyber security, this issue of wellbeing is not just a personal issue but also a business issue. Mental fatigue may lead to poor decision making, slower response time in case of incidents, and more errors being made unintentionally by people.
Hence comes the relevance of the proposed Right to Disconnect bill, Implementing it in the cybersecurity realm may require employers to plan for additional task forces so that productivity remains unaffected, while ensuring that employees receive the rest and balance they need. This approach not only protects mental well‑being but also creates opportunities for new roles, distributes workloads fairly, and strengthens the overall resilience and efficiency of the organization.
Legislature Intent - The Right to Disconnect as a preventive control
In this scenario, the Right to Disconnect Bill, 2025, which was presented in the Lok Sabha as a private member's bill, can be seen as a precautionary measure in the digital risk ecosystem instead of merely as a employee welfare initiative. It intends to create legally enforceable lines of demarcation between the demands of a job and one's personal life. The bill provisions, like the right not to answer work calls and texts after office hours, protection from being fired, pay for overtime, and agreed-upon emergency protocols, are all tools to set new norms rather than to impose restrictions on the output.
This can be seen as security logic that has been established in the cyber governance sphere. Even the best systems require planned downtimes for patching, upgrading, and recovery. Humans cannot be treated differently. Loss of operation without recovery will only increase the likelihood of failure. The Right to Disconnect works as a human-layer security, which reduces the risk of incidents caused by fatigue and burnout among employees.
The Legislative Recognition of Human Needs
The Right to Disconnect Bill is a landmark change of thinking, moving from the perception of disconnection as unprofessional to the acknowledgement of it as a basic requirement for human dignity and health. The Indian legislation, which was passed through a private member's bill, clearly defines the limits of professional and personal time. By providing the employees with the legal right to disconnect, the bill affirms what psychological science has been telling us for a long time: people need real breaks to be at their best.
Conclusion
The Proposed Right to Disconnect Bill, 2025, is a progressive move in law, which, among others confirms that a digital world, constant connectivity may undermines both individual health and company/orgnisation’s buisness continuity. A balanced approach is essential, with clearly agreed-upon emergency norms to guide situations where employees may need to work extra hours in a reasonable and lawful manner. It recognises that people are the backbone of the digital ecosystem and need time off to work effectively and securely. In a connected economy, protecting mental bandwidth is as crucial as protecting technical networks, making the Right to Disconnect a key element of sustainable resilience.
From a cybersecurity perspective, no secure digital future can emerge from exhausted minds. A strong digital and cyber‑India will have laws like the Right to Disconnect Bill, signaling a shift in policy thinking. This law moves the burden from individuals having to adapt to always-on technologies onto systems, organisations, and governance structures to respect human limits. By recognising mental well-being as an essential factor of employee’s wellbeing, the bill reinforces that resilient work ecosystems depend not only on robust infrastructure and controls but also on well-rested, focused, and secure individuals.
References
- https://www.shankariasparliament.com/blogs/pdf/right-to-disconnect-bill-2025
- https://ijlr.iledu.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/V5I653.pdf
- https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/news/no-calls-and-emails-after-office-hours-right-to-disconnect-bill-introduced-in-lok-sabha-to-set-workplace-boundaries/articleshow/125806984.cms
- https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/what-is-right-to-disconnect-bill-introduced-in-lok-sabha-and-can-it-clear-parliament-101765025582585.html

Introduction
Prebunking is a technique that shifts the focus from directly challenging falsehoods or telling people what they need to believe to understanding how people are manipulated and misled online to begin with. It is a growing field of research that aims to help people resist persuasion by misinformation. Prebunking, or "attitudinal inoculation," is a way to teach people to spot and resist manipulative messages before they happen. The crux of the approach is rooted in taking a step backwards and nipping the problem in the bud by deepening our understanding of it, instead of designing redressal mechanisms to tackle it after the fact. It has been proven effective in helping a wide range of people build resilience to misleading information.
Prebunking is a psychological strategy for countering the effect of misinformation with the goal of assisting individuals in identifying and resisting deceptive content, hence increasing resilience against future misinformation. Online manipulation is a complex issue, and multiple approaches are needed to curb its worst effects. Prebunking provides an opportunity to get ahead of online manipulation, providing a layer of protection before individuals encounter malicious content. Prebunking aids individuals in discerning and refuting misleading arguments, thus enabling them to resist a variety of online manipulations.
Prebunking builds mental defenses for misinformation by providing warnings and counterarguments before people encounter malicious content. Inoculating people against false or misleading information is a powerful and effective method for building trust and understanding along with a personal capacity for discernment and fact-checking. Prebunking teaches people how to separate facts from myths by teaching them the importance of thinking in terms of ‘how you know what you know’ and consensus-building. Prebunking uses examples and case studies to explain the types and risks of misinformation so that individuals can apply these learnings to reject false claims and manipulation in the future as well.
How Prebunking Helps Individuals Spot Manipulative Messages
Prebunking helps individuals identify manipulative messages by providing them with the necessary tools and knowledge to recognize common techniques used to spread misinformation. Successful prebunking strategies include;
- Warnings;
- Preemptive Refutation: It explains the narrative/technique and how particular information is manipulative in structure. The Inoculation treatment messages typically include 2-3 counterarguments and their refutations. An effective rebuttal provides the viewer with skills to fight any erroneous or misleading information they may encounter in the future.
- Micro-dosing: A weakened or practical example of misinformation that is innocuous.
All these alert individuals to potential manipulation attempts. Prebunking also offers weakened examples of misinformation, allowing individuals to practice identifying deceptive content. It activates mental defenses, preparing individuals to resist persuasion attempts. Misinformation can exploit cognitive biases: people tend to put a lot of faith in things they’ve heard repeatedly - a fact that malicious actors manipulate by flooding the Internet with their claims to help legitimise them by creating familiarity. The ‘prebunking’ technique helps to create resilience against misinformation and protects our minds from the harmful effects of misinformation.
Prebunking essentially helps people control the information they consume by teaching them how to discern between accurate and deceptive content. It enables one to develop critical thinking skills, evaluate sources adequately and identify red flags. By incorporating these components and strategies, prebunking enhances the ability to spot manipulative messages, resist deceptive narratives, and make informed decisions when navigating the very dynamic and complex information landscape online.
CyberPeace Policy Recommendations
- Preventing and fighting misinformation necessitates joint efforts between different stakeholders. The government and policymakers should sponsor prebunking initiatives and information literacy programmes to counter misinformation and adopt systematic approaches. Regulatory frameworks should encourage accountability in the dissemination of online information on various platforms. Collaboration with educational institutions, technological companies and civil society organisations can assist in the implementation of prebunking techniques in a variety of areas.
- Higher educational institutions should support prebunking and media literacy and offer professional development opportunities for educators, and scholars by working with academics and professionals on the subject of misinformation by producing research studies on the grey areas and challenges associated with misinformation.
- Technological companies and social media platforms should improve algorithm transparency, create user-friendly tools and resources, and work with fact-checking organisations to incorporate fact-check labels and tools.
- Civil society organisations and NGOs should promote digital literacy campaigns to spread awareness on misinformation and teach prebunking strategies and critical information evaluation. Training programmes should be available to help people recognise and resist deceptive information using prebunking tactics. Advocacy efforts should support legislation or guidelines that support and encourage prebunking efforts and promote media literacy as a basic skill in the digital landscape.
- Media outlets and journalists including print & social media should follow high journalistic standards and engage in fact-checking activities to ensure information accuracy before release. Collaboration with prebunking professionals, cyber security experts, researchers and advocacy analysts can result in instructional content and initiatives that promote media literacy, prebunking strategies and misinformation awareness.
Final Words
The World Economic Forum's Global Risks Report 2024 identifies misinformation and disinformation as the top most significant risks for the next two years. Misinformation and disinformation are rampant in today’s digital-first reality, and the ever-growing popularity of social media is only going to see the challenges compound further. It is absolutely imperative for all netizens and stakeholders to adopt proactive approaches to counter the growing problem of misinformation. Prebunking is a powerful problem-solving tool in this regard because it aims at ‘protection through prevention’ instead of limiting the strategy to harm reduction and redressal. We can draw parallels with the concept of vaccination or inoculation, reducing the probability of a misinformation infection. Prebunking exposes us to a weakened form of misinformation and provides ways to identify it, reducing the chance false information takes root in our psyches.
The most compelling attribute of this approach is that the focus is not only on preventing damage but also creating widespread ownership and citizen participation in the problem-solving process. Every empowered individual creates an additional layer of protection against the scourge of misinformation, not only making safer choices for themselves but also lowering the risk of spreading false claims to others.
References
- [1] https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2024.pdf
- [2] https://prebunking.withgoogle.com/docs/A_Practical_Guide_to_Prebunking_Misinformation.pdf
- [3] https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/17634/3565