#FactCheck - Viral image circulating on social media depicts a natural optical illusion from Epirus, Greece.

Introduction

Social media platforms have begun to shape the public understanding of history in today’s digital landscape. You may have encountered videos, images, and posts that claim to reveal an untold story about our past. For example, you might have seen a post on your feed that has a painted or black and white image of a princess and labelled as "the most beautiful princess of Rajasthan who fought countless wars but has been erased from history.” Such emotionally charged narratives spread quickly, without any academic scrutiny or citation. Unfortunately, the originator believes it to be true. 

Such unverified content may look harmless. But it profoundly contributes to the systematic distortion of historical information. Such misinformation reoccurs on feeds and becomes embedded in popular memory. It misguides the public discourse and undermines the scholarly research on the relevant topic.  Sometimes, it also contributes to communal outrage and social tensions. It is time to recognise that protecting the integrity of our cultural and historical narratives is not only an academic concern but a legal and institutional responsibility. This is where the role of the Ministry of Culture becomes critical.

‍

Pseudohistorical News Information in India

Fake news and misinformation are frequently disseminated via images, pictures, and videos on various messaging applications, which is referred to as “WhatsApp University” in a derogatory way. WhatsApp has become India’s favourite method of communication, while users have to stay very conscious about what they are consuming from forwarded messages. Academic historians strive to understand the past in its context to differentiate it from the present, whereas pseudo-historians try to manipulate history to satisfy their political agendas. Unfortunately, this wave of pseudo-history is expanding rapidly, with platforms like 'WhatsApp University' playing a significant role in amplifying its spread. This has led to an increase in fake historical news and paid journalism. Unlike pseudo-history, academic history is created by professional historians in academic contexts, adhering to strict disciplinary guidelines, including peer review and expert examination of justifications, assertions, and publications.

‍

How to Identify Pseudo-Historic Misinformation 

1. Lack of Credible Sources: There is a lack of reliable primary and secondary sources. Instead, pseudohistorical works depend on hearsay and unreliable eyewitness accounts.

2. Selective Use of Evidence: Misinformative posts portray only those facts that support their argument and minimise the facts which is contradictory to their assertions.  

3. Incorporation of Conspiracy Theories: They often include conspiracy theories, which postulate secret groups, repressed knowledge. They might mention that evil powers influenced the historical events. Such hypotheses frequently lack any supporting data. 

4. Extravagant Claims: Pseudo-historic tales sometimes present unbelievable assertions about historic persons or events. 

5. Lack of Peer Review: Such work is generally never published on authentic academic platforms. You would not find them on platforms like LinkedIn, but on platforms like Instagram and Facebook, as they do not pitch for academic publications. Authentic historical research is examined by subject-matter authorities. 

6. Neglect of Established Historiographical Methods: Such posts lack knowledge of a recognised methodology and procedures, like the critical study of sources.

7. Ideologically Driven Narratives: Political, communal, ideological, and personal opinions are prioritised in such posts. The author has a prior goal, instead of finding the truth.

8. Exploitation of Gaps in the Historical Record: Pseudo-historians often use missing or unclear parts of history to suggest that regular historians are hiding important secrets. They make the story sound more mysterious than it is. 

9. Rejection of Scholarly Consensus: Pseudo-historians often reject the views of experts and historians, choosing instead to believe and promote their strange ideas.

10. Emphasis on Sensationalism: Pseudo-historical works may put more emphasis on sensationalism than academic rigour to pique public interest rather than offer a fair and thorough account of the history.

‍

Legal and Institutional Responsibility

Public opinion is the heart of democracy. It should not be affected by any misinformation or disinformation. Vested interests cannot be allowed to sabotage this public opinion. Specifically, when it concerns academia, it cannot be shared unverified without any fact-checking. Such unverified claims can be called out, and action can be taken only if the authorities take over the charge. In India, the Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR) regulates the historical academia. As per the official website, their stated aim is to “take all such measures as may be found necessary from time to time to promote historical research and its utilisation in the country,”. However, it is now essential to modernise the functioning of the ICHR to meet the demands of the digital era. Concerned authorities can run campaigns and awareness programmes to question the validity and research of such misinformative posts. Just as there are fact-checking mechanisms for news, there must also be an institutional push to fact-check and regulate historical content online. The following measures can be taken by authorities to strike down such misinformation online: 

1. Launch a nationwide awareness campaign about historical misinformation.
2. Work with scholars, historians, and digital platforms to promote verified content.
3. Encourage social media platforms to introduce fact-check labels for historical posts.
4. Consider legal frameworks that penalise the deliberate spread of false historical narratives.

History is part of our national heritage, and preserving its accuracy is a matter of public interest. Misinformation and pseudo-history are a combination that misleads the public and weakens the foundation of shared cultural identity. In this digital era, false narratives spread rapidly, and it is important to promote critical thinking, encourage responsible academic work, and ensure that the public has access to accurate and well-researched historical information. Protecting the integrity of history is not just the work of historians — it is a collective responsibility that serves the future of our democracy.

‍

References:

1. https://kuey.net/index.php/kuey/article/view/4091 
2. https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-news-editorials/social-media-and-the-menace-of-false-information 

‍

Executive Summary:

A video is widely circulating on social media in which Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appears to praise India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The viral clip is being shared with the claim that during a speech delivered on February 25, 2026, Netanyahu announced a special aid package for Afghanistan at the request of PM Modi. However, research by CyberPeace found the claim to be false. The research  revealed that the circulating video was generated using artificial intelligence. The probe also confirmed that Netanyahu did not make any announcement related to Afghanistan or the Taliban during the speech.

‍

Claim

‍

On March 1, 2026, a social media user shared the viral video on Facebook claiming that Netanyahu praised PM Modi and announced a special assistance package for Afghanistan following India’s request. The links to the post and its archive are provided below, along with a screenshot.

‍

‍

• https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1232824969028031 
• https://ghostarchive.org/archive/lq0oN 

‍

‍

Fact Check: 

‍

To verify the claim, we first searched Google using relevant keywords. However, we did not find any credible media reports supporting the claim that Israel had announced such an aid package for Afghanistan. Next, we extracted key frames from the viral video and performed a reverse image search using Google Lens. During this process, we found the original video on the YouTube channel of VERTEX, which had been uploaded on February 25, 2026.

‍

• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLf6uf6Sjf4 

‍

‍

A detailed review of the original video revealed that the viral clip circulating on social media is not part of the original footage. This indicates that the circulating clip has been manipulated and shared with a misleading claim. In the original video, Netanyahu was addressing a special parliamentary session in Jerusalem, where he spoke about the growing trade, strategic cooperation, and strengthening diplomatic relations between India and Israel. He described the partnership between the two democracies as a significant and historic milestone in bilateral relations. Upon carefully listening to the viral clip, we noticed irregularities in the voice and tone, which raised suspicions that it might be AI-generated. We then analyzed the video using the AI detection tool TruthScan. The results indicated that the viral video has approximately a 75% probability of being AI-generated.

‍

‍

‍

Conclusion

‍

Our research  found that the viral video was created using artificial intelligence. Moreover, Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not make any announcement regarding Afghanistan or the Taliban during the speech being referenced. The claim circulating on social media is therefore false.

‍

Overview:

WazirX is the platform for cryptocurrencies, based in India that has been hacked, and it made a loss of more than $230 million in cryptocurrency. This case concerned an unauthorized transaction with a multisignature or multisig, wallet controlled through Liminal’a digital asset management platform. These attacking incidents have thereafter raised more questions on the security of the Cryptocurrency exchanges and efficiency of the existing policies and laws.

Wallet Configuration and Security Measures

This wallet was breached and had a multisig setting meaning that more than one signature was needed to authorize a transaction. Specifically, it had six signatories: five are funded by WazirX and one is funded by Liminal. Every transaction needed the approval of at least three signatories of WazirX, all of whom had addressed security concerns by using Ledger’s hardware wallets; while the Liminal, too, had a signatory, for approval.

To further increase the level of security of the transactions, a whitelisting policy was introduced, only limited addresses were authorized to receive funds. This system was rather vulnerable, and the attackers managed to grasp the discrepancy between the information available through Liminal’s interface and the content of the transaction to seize unauthorized control over the wallet and implement the theft.

Modus Operandi: Attack Mechanics

The cyber attack appears to have been carefully carried out, with preliminary investigations suggesting the following tactics: 

• Payload Manipulation: The attackers apparently substituted the transaction’s payload during signing; hence, they can reroute the collected funds into an unrelated wallet. 

• Chain Hopping: To make it much harder to track their movements, the attackers split large amounts of money across multiple blockchains and broke tens of thousands of dollars into thousands of transactions involving different cryptocurrencies. This technique makes it difficult to trace people and things. 

• Zero Balance Transactions: There were also some instances where it ended up with no Ethereum (ETH) in the balance and such wallets also in use for the purpose of further anonymization of the transactions.

• Analysis of the blockchain data suggested the enemy might have been making the preparations for this attack for several days prior to their attack and involved a high amount of planning. 

Actions taken by WazirX:

Following the attack, WazirX implemented a series of immediate actions:

• User Notifications: The users were immediately notified of the occurrence of the breach and the possible risk it posed to them. 

• Law Enforcement Engagement: The matters were reported to the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal and specific authorities of which the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) and the Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In). 

• Service Suspension: WazirX had suspended all its trading operations and user deposits’ and withdrawals’ to minimize further cases and investigate. 

• Global Outreach: The exchange contacted more than 500 cryptocurrency exchanges and requested to blacklist the wallet’s addresses linked to the theft. 

• Bounty Program: A bounty program was announced to encourage people to share information that can enable the authorities to retrieve the stolen money. A maximum of 23 million dollars was placed on the bounty. 

Further  Investigations 

WazirX stated that it has contracted the services of cybersecurity professionals to help in the prosecution process of identifying and compensating for the losses. The exchange is still investigating the forensic data and working with the police for tracking the stolen assets. Nevertheless, the prospects of full recovery may be quite questionable primarily because of complexity of the attack and the methods used by the attackers. 

Precautionary measures: 

 The WazirX cyber attack clearly implies that there is the necessity to improve the security and the regulation of the cryptocurrency industry. As exchanges become increasingly targeted by hackers, there is a pressing need for: 

• Stricter Security Protocols: The commitment to technical innovations, such as integration of MFA, as well as constant monitoring of the users’ wallets’ activities. 

• Regulatory Oversight: Formalization of the laws that require proper security for the cryptocurrency exchange platforms to safeguard their users as well as their investments. 

• Community Awareness: To bypass such predicaments, there is a need to study on emergent techniques in spreading awareness, particularly in cases of scams or phishing attempts that are likely to follow such breaches. 

Conclusion:

The cyber attack on WazirX in the field of cryptocurrency market, shows weaknesses and provides valuable lessons for enhancing the security.  This attack highlights critical vulnerabilities in cryptocurrency exchanges, even though employing advanced security measures like multisignature wallets and whitelisting policies. The attack's complexity, involving payload manipulation, chain hopping, and zero balance transactions, underscores the attackers' meticulous planning and the challenges in tracing stolen assets. This case brings a strong message regarding the necessity of solid security measures, and constant attention to security in the rapidly growing world of digital assets. Furthermore, the incident highlights the importance of community awareness and education on emerging threats like scams and phishing attempts, which usually follow such breaches. By fostering a culture of vigilance and knowledge, the cryptocurrency community can better defend against future attacks.

Reference:

https://wazirx.com/blog/important-update-cyber-attack-incident-and-measures-to-protect-your-assets/

https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/opinion/the-230-million-crypto-theft-at-wazirx-is-a-wake-up-call-for-indian-regulators-government-12772563.html

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/wazirx-cyberattack-in-depth-analysis-jyqxf

‍