#FactCheck - Fake Image Claiming Patanjali selling Beef Biryani Recipe mix is Misleading

Introduction

On 1 July 2026, the United Nations published their first draft of the Development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) report. The scientists who authored this document are 40 individuals who comprise the Independent International Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence , which was formed by the UN General Assembly in 2025 and chaired by Bengio and Ressa.

The report’s key takeaway message relates to the importance of countries establishing frameworks for the appropriate use of AI technologies as a means of preventing the aggravation of social inequality. UN Secretary-General António Guterres pointed out that without such regulation, society will not be able to enjoy the benefits of these technologies. After all, their explosive development is already beginning to have negative consequences.

This report served as key for the UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance, which was held in Geneva on 6^thJuly, 2026.

What Exactly Does the Report Say?

It is not a rulebook, it doesn't create laws. It is more of a survey to get countries on board before they start treaties regarding AI.

This is seen through how much AI has developed from previous technologies, such as electricity taking decades to be common everywhere while the internet took 15 years to get to a billion users, but chatGPT alone got to 100 million users within 2 months. Today, millions of people use AI chatbots, and AI has helped map out 200 million+ protein structures currently helping us get drugs to market much faster.

The report is also cautious. It talks about an "evidence dilemma" , we need evidence to make good AI rules, but by the time it's collected, it might be too late to control the technology. There are 45+ AI frameworks worldwide, but they're disconnected, and some safety checks are done by the same companies that build the AI,  raising doubts about their trustworthiness.

The Big Inequality Problem

This is one of the most eye-opening parts of the report. It says the USA has about 75% of the world's most powerful supercomputers, while China has around 15%,  together, 90% of the world's top computing power. Most AI models are also built in these two countries, meaning they stand to gain the most from AI's growth.

Here's the shocking part: nearly two-thirds of people in high-income countries will benefit from AI tools. But in low-income countries, only about 5% will see any real benefit. Just because AI tools exist doesn't mean everyone gets equal access — especially poorer countries that depend on other nations for AI tools, cloud services, and data.

The Language Problem

Another major issue is language. Most AI tools work well in English and a few major languages. But for other languages, these tools are far less reliable, which becomes dangerous in fields like healthcare.

The report provides shocking examples of how AI translation software has been mistakenly conflating smallpox with syphilis and gonorrhoea with diabetes. It also describes how an attempt by a nurse to reassure a patient speaking Tigrinya that she was about to be given "IV antibiotics", had in fact, been translated by the software into "IV insecticides".

Other Serious Concerns

The report also warns about darker uses of AI, like creating sexual abuse material and fake explicit videos (deepfakes), which mostly harm women and children. AI-generated disinformation is being used to manipulate elections, while cybercriminals use AI for fraud and other crimes.

In addition, AI could have negative impacts on individuals struggling with mental health issues and even driving vulnerable populations to commit suicide. Moreover, the global AI infrastructure is estimated to release huge amounts of CO2 that is contributing to environmental damage.

What the Report Recommends

Because most of the power over AI development will be controlled by major corporations and nations, the report charges that the system is likely to lead to "unjust hierarchical control over critical systems."

To fix this, the suggestions include:

- Independent groups, not AI companies themselves, should test AI systems.

- Countries should cooperate to regulate artificial intelligence technologies instead of imposing a policy on a particular state.

- The states should develop the technical and language expertise to participate in the global negotiations on AI governance.

- However, the global AI governance should address developing countries’ needs to upgrade their infrastructures, such as electricity and data, and strike a balance between sustainability and digitalization.

Conclusion

This UN report is an important first step, giving countries real scientific evidence as they move towards binding international agreements on AI. Its biggest takeaway is this: AI itself is neutral — neither good nor bad on its own. What makes it good or bad for the world are the choices made by governments, firms, and societies in regulating it. Without proper control, AI technologies may well make inequality even worse than it already is. The negotiations to come will be critical in determining the future of the technology.

References

• United Nations News, 'AI explained: Why the world needs to act now', 1 July 2026
• Euronews, 'Window to control AI is closing and it could widen inequality, UN experts warn', 2 July 2026
• Irish Examiner, 'Rapid spread of AI may worsen global inequality, UN warns', 1 July 2026
• Reuters, 'UN report sees enormous potential benefits, big risks in AI', 1 July 2026
• Preliminary Report of the Independent International Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence, United Nations, July 2026

‍

Introduction

In today’s digital age, everyone is online, so is the healthcare sector worldwide. The latest victim of a data breach is Hong Kong healthcare provider OT&P Healthcare, which has recently suffered a data loss of 100,000 patients that exposed their medical history, and caused concern to the patients and their families. This breach has highlighted the vulnerability in the healthcare sector /industry and the importance of cybersecurity measures to protect sensitive information. This blog will explore the data breach, its impact on patients and families, and the best practices for safeguarding sensitive data.

Background: On 13 March 2023, an incident took place where the Cybercriminals deployed a variety of methods to breach the data, which included phishing attacks, malware, and exploiting software vulnerabilities. OT&P Health Care exploits the sensitive data of the patients. According to OT&P Healthcare, it is working together with law enforcement and has hired a cybersecurity firm to investigate the incident and tighten its security procedures. Like other data breaches, the inquiry will most certainly take some time to uncover the actual source and scope of the intrusion. Regardless of the cause of the breach, this event emphasises the significance of frequent cybersecurity assessments, vulnerability testing, and proactive data protection measures. Considering the dangers in the healthcare sector must be cautious in preserving the personal and medical records of the patients as they are sensitive in nature.

Is confidentiality at stake due to data breaches?

Medical data breaches represent a huge danger to patients, with serious ramifications for their privacy, financial security, and physical health. Some of the potential hazards and effects of medical data breaches are as follows:

• Compromise of patient data: Medical data breaches can expose patients’ sensitive information, such as their medical history, diagnoses, treatment, and medication regimens. If history is highly personal and reaches the wrong hands, it could harm someone’s reputation.
• Identity theft: the data stolen by the cybercriminals may be used by them to open credit accounts and apply for loans, Patients can suffer severe financial and psychological stress because of identity theft since they may spend years attempting to rebuild their credit and regain their good name.
• Medical Fraud: Medical data breaches can also result in medical fraud, which occurs when hackers use stolen medical information to charge insurance companies for services that were not performed or for bogus treatments or procedures. Medical fraud may result in financial losses for patients, insurance companies, and individuals obtaining ineffective or risky medical care.

Impact on patients

Data breach does not cause financial loss but may also profoundly impact their mental health and emotional well-being. let’s understand some psychological impacts:

• Anxiety and Stress: Patients whose medical data has been affected may experience feelings of stress and anxiety as they worry about the potential consequences of the data loss can be misused.
• Loss of faith: Patients may lose faith in their healthcare providers if they believe their personal and medical information needs to be properly As a result, patients may be reluctant to disclose sensitive information to their healthcare professionals, compromising the quality of their medical care.
• Sense of Embarrassment: Patients may feel disregarded or ashamed if their sensitive medical information is revealed, particularly if it relates to a sensitive or stigmatised This might lead to social isolation and a reluctance to seek further medical treatment.
• Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): Patients who have experienced a data breach may have PTSD symptoms such as nightmares, flashbacks, and avoidance behaviour. This can have long-term consequences for their mental health and quality of life.

Legal Implications of Data Breach

Patients have certain legal rights and compensations when a healthcare data breach occurs. Let’s have a look at them: –

• Legal Liability: Healthcare providers have a legal obligation to protect data under various privacy and security laws if they fail to take appropriate measures to protect patient data, they may be held legally liable for resulting harm.
• Legal recourse: Patients whose healthcare data leak has impacted them have the legal right to seek compensation and hold healthcare providers and organisations This could involve suing the healthcare practitioner or organisationresponsible for the breach.
• Right to seek compensation: the patients who have suffered from the data loss are liable to seek compensation.
• Notifications: As soon as a data breach takes place, it impacts the organisation and its customers. In this case, it is the responsibility of the OT&P to
• notify their patients about the data breach and inform them about the consequences.
• Take Away from OT &P Healthcare Data Breach: with the growing data breaches in the healthcare industry, here are some lessons that can be learned from the Hong Kong data breach.
• Cybersecurity: The OT&P Healthcare data breach points to the vital need to prioritisecybersecurity in healthcare. To secure themselves, hospitals and the healthcare sector must use the latest software to protect their data.
• Regular risk assessments: These assessments help find system vulnerabilities and security issues. This can assist healthcare providers and organisationsin taking the necessary actions to avoid data breaches and boost their cybersecurity defences.
• Staff Training: Healthcare workers should be taught cybersecurity best practices, such as detecting and responding to phishing attempts, handling sensitive data, and reporting suspected security breaches. This training should be continued to keep workers updated on the newest cybersecurity trends and threats.
• Incident Response Strategy: Healthcare providers and organisations should have an incident response policy in place to deal with data breaches and other security concerns. This strategy should include protocols for reporting instances, limiting the breach, and alerting patients and verified authorities.

Conclusion

The recent data breach in Hong Kong healthcare impact not only the patients but also their trust is shaken. As we continue to rely on digital technology for medical records and healthcare delivery, it is essential that healthcare providers and organisations take proactive steps to protect patient data from cyber-attacks and data breaches.

References

https://www.marketing-interactive.com/otp-healthcare-apologises-over-data-breach-patients-reportedly-impacted

https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/health-environment/article/3219827/personal-data-medical-history-100000-patients-may-have-been-leaked-cyberattack-hong-kong-healthcare

https://www.teiss.co.uk/news/hong-kongs-otp-healthcare-exposes-the-medical-history-of-100000-patients-12170

Introduction

In an era where digitalization is transforming every facet of life, ensuring that personal data is protected becomes crucial. The enactment of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDP Act) is a significant step that has been taken by the Indian Parliament which sets forth a comprehensive framework for Digital Personal Data. The Draft Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025 has recently been released for public consultation to supplement the Act and ensure its smooth implementation once finalised. Though noting certain positive aspects, there is still room for addressing certain gaps and multiple aspects under the draft rules that require attention. The DPDP Act, 2023 recognises the individual’s right to protect their personal data providing control over the processing of personal data for lawful purposes. This Act applies to data which is available in digital form as well as data which is not in digital form but is digitalised subsequently. While the Act is intended to offer wide control to the individuals (Data Principal) over their personal information, its impact on vulnerable groups such as ‘Persons with Disabilities’ requires closer scrutiny. 

Person with Disabilities as data principal

The term ‘data principal’ has been defined under the DPDP Act under Section 2(j) as a person to whom the personal data is related to, which also includes a person with a disability. A lawful guardian acting on behalf of such person with disability has also been included under the ambit of this definition of Data Principal. As a result, a lawful guardian acting on behalf of a person with disability will have the same rights and responsibilities as a data principal under the Act. 

• Section 9 of the DPDP Act, 2023 states that before processing the personal data of a person with a disability who has a lawful guardian, the data fiduciary must obtain verifiable consent from that guardian, ensuring proper protection of the person with disability's data privacy.
• The data principal has the right to access information about personal data under Section 11 which is being processed by the data fiduciary.
• Section 12 provides the right to correction and erasure of personal data by making a request in a manner prescribed by the data fiduciary. 
• A right to grievance redressal must be provided to the data principal in respect of any act or omission of performance of obligations by the data fiduciary or the consent manager. 
• Under Section 14, the data principal has the right to nominate any other person to exercise the rights provided under the Act in case of death or incapacity. 

Provision of consent and its implication

The three key components of Consent that can be identified under the DPDP Act, are:

• Explicit and Informed Consent: Consent given for the processing of data by the data principal or a lawful guardian in case of persons with disabilities must be clear, free and informed as per section 6 of the Act. The data fiduciary must specify the itemised description of the personal data required along with the specified purpose and description of the goods or services that would be provided by such processing of data. (Rule 3 under Draft Digital Personal Data Protection Rules)

• Verifiable Consent: Section 9 of the DPDP Act provides that the data fiduciary needs to obtain verifiable consent of the lawful guardian before processing any personal data of such a person with a disability.  Rule 10 of the Draft Rules obligates the data fiduciary to adopt measures to ensure that the consent given by the lawful guardian is verifiable before the is processed. 
• Withdrawal of Consent: Data principal or such lawful guardian has the option to withdraw consent for the processing of data at any point by making a request to the data fiduciary.   

Although the Act includes certain provisions that focus on the inclusivity of persons with disability, the interpretation of such sections says otherwise. 

Concerns related to provisions for Persons with Disabilities under the DPDP Act:

• Lack of definition of ‘person with disabilities’: The DPDP Act or the Draft Rules does not define the term ‘persons with disabilities’. This will create confusion as to which categories of disability are included and up to what percentage.  The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 clearly defines ‘person with benchmark disability’, ‘person with disability’ and ‘person with disability having high support needs’. This categorisation is essential to determine up to what extent a person with disability needs a lawful guardian which is missing under the DPDP Act.   
• Lack of autonomy: Though the definition of data principal includes persons with disabilities however the decision-making authority has been given to the lawful guardian of such individuals. The section creates ambiguity for people who have a lower percentage of disability and are capable of making their own decisions and have no autonomy in making decisions related to the processing of their personal data because of the lack of clarity in the definition of ‘persons with disabilities’. 
• Safeguards for abuse of power by lawful guardian: The lawful guardian once verified by the data fiduciary can make decisions for the persons with disabilities. This raises concerns regarding the potential abuse of power by lawful guardians in relation to the handling of personal data. The DPDP Act does not provide any specific protection against such abuse.
• Difficulty in verification of consent: The consent obtained by the Data Fiduciary must be verified. The process that will be adopted for verification is at the discretion of the data fiduciary according to Rule 10 of the Draft Data Protection Rules. The authenticity of consent is difficult to determine as it is a complex process which lacks a standard format. Also, with the technological advancements, it would be challenging to identify whether the information given to verify the consent is actually true. 

CyberPeace Recommendations

The DPDP Act, 2023 is a major step towards making the data protection framework more comprehensive, however, the provisions related to persons with disabilities and powers given to lawful guardians acting on their behalf still need certain clarity and refinement within the DPDP Act framework. 

• Consonance of DPDP with Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPWD) Act, 2016: The RPWD and DPDP Act should supplement each other and can be used to clear the existing ambiguities. Such as the definition of ‘persons with disabilities’ under the RPWD Act can be used in the context of the DPDP Act, 2023. 
• Also, there must be certain mechanisms and safeguards within the Act to prevent abuse of power by the lawful guardian. The affected individual in case of suspected abuse of power should have an option to file a complaint with the Data Protection Board and the Board can further take necessary actions to determine whether there is abuse of power or not. 
• Regulatory oversight and additional safeguards are required to ensure that consent is obtained in a manner that respects the rights of all individuals, including those with disabilities. 

References:

• https://www.meity.gov.in/writereaddata/files/Digital%20Personal%20Data%20Protection%20Act%202023.pdf
• https://www.meity.gov.in/writereaddata/files/259889.pdf 
• https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/15939/1/the_rights_of_persons_with_disabilities_act%2C_2016.pdf 
• https://www.deccanherald.com/opinion/consent-disability-rights-and-data-protection-3143441
• https://www.pacta.in/digital-data-protection-consent-protocols-for-disability.pdf
• https://www.snrlaw.in/indias-new-data-protection-regime-tracking-updates-and-preparing-for-compliance/ 

‍