#FactCheck-Air Taxi is a prototype and is not launched to commercial public

Introduction

‍

Online dating platforms have become a common way for individuals to connect in today’s digital age. For many in the LGBTQ+ community, especially in environments where offline meeting spaces are limited, these platforms offer a way to find companionship and support. However, alongside these opportunities come serious risks. Users are increasingly being targeted by cybercrimes such as blackmail, sextortion, identity theft, and online harassment. These incidents often go unreported due to stigma and concerns about privacy. The impact of such crimes can be both emotional and financial, highlighting the need for greater awareness and digital safety.

‍

Cybercrime On LGBTQ+ Dating Apps: A Threat Landscape

‍

According to the NCRB 2022 report, there has been a 24.4% increase in cybercrimes. But unfortunately, the queer community-specific data is not available.  Cybercrimes that target LGBTQ+ users in very organised and predatory. In several Indian cities, gangs actively monitor dating platforms to the point that potential victims, especially young queers and those who seem discreet about their identity, become targets. Once the contact is established, perpetrators use a standard operating process, building false trust, forcing private exchanges, and then gradually starting blackmail and financial exploitation. Many queer victims are blackmailed with threats of exposure to families or workplaces, often by fake police demanding bribes. Fear of stigma and insensitive policing discourages reporting. Cyber criminal gangs exploit these gaps on dating apps. Despite some arrests, under-reporting persists, and activists call for stronger platform safety.

‍

Types of Cyber Crimes against Queer Community on Dating Apps

‍

1. Romance scam or “Lonely hearts scam”: Scammers build trust with false stories (military, doctors, NGO workers) and quickly express strong romantic interest. They later request money, claiming emergencies. They often try to create multiple accounts to avoid profile bans. 
2. Sugar daddy scam: In this type of scam, the fraudster offers money or allowance in exchange for things like chatting, sending photos, or other interactions. They usually offer a specific amount and want to use some uncommon payment gateways. After telling you they will send you a lot of money, they often make up a story like: “My last sugar baby cheated me, so now you must first send me a small amount to prove you are trustworthy.” This is just a trick to make you send them money first.
3. Sextortion / Blackmail scam: Scammers record explicit chats or pretend to be underage, then threaten exposure unless you pay. Some target discreet users. Never send explicit content or pay blackmailers. 
4. Investment Scams: Scammers posing as traders or bankers convince victims to invest in fake opportunities. Some "flip" small amounts to build trust, then disappear with larger sums. Real investors won’t approach you on dating apps. Don’t share financial info or transfer money.
5. Pay-Before-You-Meet scam: Scammer demands upfront payment (gift cards, gas money, membership fees) before meeting, then vanishes. Never pay anyone before meeting in person.
6. Security app registration scam: Scammers ask you to register on fake "security apps" to steal your info, claiming it ensures your safety. Research apps before registering. Be wary of quick link requests.
7. The Verification code scam: Scammers trick you into giving them SMS verification codes, allowing them to hijack your accounts. Never share verification codes with anyone.
8. Third-party app links: Mass spam messages with suspicious links that steal info or infect devices. Don’t click suspicious links or “Google me” messages.
9. Support message scam: Messages pretending to be from application support, offering prizes or fake shows to lure you to malicious sites. 

‍

Platform Accountability & Challenges 

‍

The issue of online dating platforms in India is characterised by weak grievance redressal, poor takedown of abusive profiles, and limited moderation practices. Most platforms appoint grievance officers or offer an in-app complaint portal, but complaints are often unanswered or receive only automated and AI-generated responses. This highlights the gap between policy and enforcement on the ground.

Abusive or fake profiles, often used for scams, hate crimes, and outing LGBTQ+ individuals, remain active long after being reported. In India, organised extortion gangs have exploited such profiles to lure, assault, rob, and blackmail queer men. Moderation teams often struggle with backlogs and lack the resources needed to handle even the most serious complaints.

Despite offering privacy settings and restricting profile visibility, moderation practices in India are still weak, leaving large segments of users vulnerable to impersonation, catfishing, and fraud. The concept of pseudonymisation can help protect vulnerable communities, but it is difficult to distinguish authentic users from malicious actors without robust, privacy-respecting verification systems. 

Since many LGBTQ+ individuals prefer to maintain their confidentiality, while others are more vocal about their identities, in either case, the data shared by an individual with an online dating platform must be vigilantly protected. The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, mandates the protection of personal data. Section 8(4) provides: “A Data Fiduciary shall implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure effective observance of the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder.” Accordingly, digital platforms collecting such data should adopt the necessary technical and organisational measures to comply with data protection laws.

Recommendations

‍

The Supreme Court has been proactive in this regard, through decisions like Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, which decriminalised same-sex relationships. Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India and Ors., acknowledged the right to privacy as a fundamental right, and, most recently, the 2025 affirmation of the right to digital access. However, to protect LGBTQ+ people online, more robust legal frameworks are still required.

There is a requirement for a dedicated commission or an empowered LGBTQ+ cell. Like the National Commission for Women (NCW), which works to safeguard the rights of women, a similar commission would address community-specific issues, including cybercrime, privacy violations, and discrimination on digital platforms. It may serve as an institutional link between the victim, the digital platforms, the government, and the police. Dating Platforms must enhance their security features and grievance mechanisms to safeguard the users.

Best Practices

‍

Scammers use data sets and plans to target individuals seeking specific interests, such as love, sex, money, or association. Do not make financial transactions, such as signing up for third-party platforms or services. Scammers may attempt to create accounts for others, which can be used to access dating platforms and harm legitimate users. Users should be vigilant about sharing sensitive information, such as private images, contact information, or addresses, as scammers can use this information to threaten users. Stay smart, stay cyber safe. 

‍

References

1. https://www.hindustantimes.com/htcity/cinema/16yearold-queer-child-pranshu-dies-by-suicide-due-to-bullying-did-we-fail-as-a-society-mental-health-expert-opines-101701172202794.html#google_vignette
2. https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v11i6/SR22617213031.pdf
3. https://help.grindr.com/hc/en-us/articles/1500009328241-Scam-awareness-guide
4. http://meity.gov.in/static/uploads/2024/06/2bf1f0e9f04e6fb4f8fef35e82c42aa5.pdf
5. https://mib.gov.in/sites/default/files/2024-02/IT%28Intermediary%20Guidelines%20and%20Digital%20Media%20Ethics%20Code%29%20Rules%2C%202021%20English.pdf

‍

The race for global leadership in AI is in full force. As China and the US emerge as the ‘AI Superpowers’ in the world, the world grapples with the questions around AI governance, ethics, regulation, and safety. Some are calling this an ‘AI Arms Race.’ Most of the applications of these AI systems are in large language models for commercial use or military applications. Countries like Germany, Japan, France, Singapore, and India are now participating in this race and are not mere spectators. 

The Government of India’s Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has launched the IndiaAI Mission, an umbrella program for the use and development of AI technology. This MeitY initiative lays the groundwork for supporting an array of AI goals for the country. The government has allocated INR 10,300 crore for this endeavour. This mission includes pivotal initiatives like the IndiaAI Compute Capacity, IndiaAI Innovation Centre (IAIC), IndiaAI Datasets Platform, IndiaAI Application Development Initiative, IndiaAI FutureSkills, IndiaAI Startup Financing, and Safe & Trusted AI.

There are several challenges and opportunities that India will have to navigate and capitalize on to become a significant player in the global AI race. The various components of India’s ‘AI Stack’ will have to work well in tandem to create a robust ecosystem that yields globally competitive results. The IndiaAI mission focuses on building large language models in vernacular languages and developing compute infrastructure. There must be more focus on developing good datasets and research as well.

Resource Allocation and Infrastructure Development

The government is focusing on building the elementary foundation for AI competitiveness. This includes the procurement of AI chips and compute capacity, about 10,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), to support India’s start-ups, researchers, and academics. These GPUs have been strategically distributed, with 70% being high-end newer models and the remaining 30% comprising lower-end older-generation models. This approach ensures that a robust ecosystem is built, which includes everything from cutting-edge research to more routine applications. A major player in this initiative is Yotta Data Services, which holds the largest share of 9,216 GPUs, including 8,192 Nvidia H100s. Other significant contributors include Amazon AWS's managed service providers, Jio Platforms, and CtrlS Datacenters. 

Policy Implications: Charting a Course for Tech Sovereignty and Self-reliance

With this government initiative, there is a concerted effort to develop indigenous AI models and reduce tech dependence on foreign players. There is a push to develop local Large Language Models and domain-specific foundational models, creating AI solutions that are truly Indian in nature and application. Many advanced chip manufacturing takes place in Taiwan, which has a looming China threat. India’s focus on chip procurement and GPUs speaks to a larger agenda of self-reliance and sovereignty, keeping in mind the geopolitical calculus. This is an important thing to focus on, however, it must not come at the cost of developing the technological ‘know-how’ and research. 

Developing AI capabilities at home also has national security implications. When it comes to defence systems, control over AI infrastructure and data becomes extremely important. The IndiaAI Mission will focus on safe and trusted AI, including developing frameworks that fit the Indian context. It has to be ensured that AI applications align with India's security interests and can be confidently deployed in sensitive defence applications.

The big problem here to solve here is the ‘data problem.’ There must be a focus on developing strategies to mitigate the data problem that disadvantages the Indian AI ecosystem. Some data problems are unique to India, such as generating data in local languages. While other problems are the ones that appear in every AI ecosystem development lifecycle namely generating publicly available data and licensed data. India must strengthen its ‘Digital Public Infrastructure’ and data commons across sectors and domains.

India has proposed setting up the India Data Management Office to serve as India’s data regulator as part of its draft National Data Governance Framework Policy. The MeitY IndiaAI expert working group report also talked about operationalizing the India Datasets Platform and suggested the establishment of data management units within each ministry.

Economic Impact: Growth and Innovation

The government’s focus on technology and industry has far-reaching economic implications. There is a push to develop the AI startup ecosystem in the country. The IndiaAI mission heavily focuses on inviting ideas and projects under its ambit. The investments will strengthen the IndiaAI startup financing system, making it easier for nascent AI businesses to obtain capital and accelerate their development from product to market. Funding provisions for industry-led AI initiatives that promote social impact and stimulate innovation and entrepreneurship are also included in the plan. The government press release states, "The overarching aim of this financial outlay is to ensure a structured implementation of the IndiaAI Mission through a public-private partnership model aimed at nurturing India’s AI innovation ecosystem.”

The government also wants to establish India as a hub for sustainable AI innovation and attract top AI talent from across the globe. One crucial aspect that needs to be worked on here is fostering talent and skill development. India has a unique advantage, that is, top-tier talent in STEM fields. Yet we suffer from a severe talent gap that needs to be addressed on a priority basis. Even though India is making strides in nurturing AI talents, out-migration of tech talent is still a reality. Once the hardware manufacturing “goods-side” of economics transitions to service delivery in the field of AI globally, India will need to be ready to deploy its talent. Several structural and policy interfaces, like the New Education Policy and industry-academic partnership frameworks, allow India to capitalize on this opportunity. 

India’s talent strategy must be robust and long-term, focusing heavily on multi-stakeholder engagement. The government has a pivotal role here by creating industry-academia interfaces and enabling tech hubs and innovation parks.

India's Position in the Global AI Race

India’s foreign policy and geopolitical standpoint have been one of global cooperation. This must not change when it comes to AI. Even though this has been dubbed as the “AI Arms Race,” India should encourage worldwide collaboration on AI R&D through collaboration with other countries in order to strengthen its own capabilities. India must prioritise more significant open-source AI development, work with the US, Europe, Australia, Japan, and other friendly countries to prevent the unethical use of AI and contribute to the formation of a global consensus on the boundaries for AI development. 

The IndiaAI Mission will have far-reaching implications for India’s diplomatic and economic relations. The unique proposition that India comes with is its ethos of inclusivity, ethics, regulation, and safety from the get-go. We should keep up the efforts to create a powerful voice for the Global South in AI. The IndiaAI Mission marks a pivotal moment in India's technological journey. Its success could not only elevate India's status as a tech leader but also serve as a model for other nations looking to harness the power of AI for national development and global competitiveness. In conclusion, the IndiaAI Mission seeks to strengthen India's position as a global leader in AI, promote technological independence, guarantee the ethical and responsible application of AI, and democratise the advantages of AI at all societal levels.

References

• ​​Ashwini Vaishnaw to launch IndiaAI portal, 10 firms to provide 14,000 GPUs. (2025, February 17). https://www.business-standard.com/. Retrieved February 25, 2025, from https://www.business-standard.com/industry/news/indiaai-compute-portal-ashwini-vaishnaw-gpu-artificial-intelligence-jio-125021700245_1.html
• Global IndiaAI Summit 2024 being organized with a commitment to advance responsible development, deployment and adoption of AI in the country. (n.d.). https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=2029841
• India to Launch AI Compute Portal, 10 Firms to Supply 14,000 GPUs. (2025, February 17). apacnewsnetwork.com. https://apacnewsnetwork.com/2025/02/india-to-launch-ai-compute-portal-10-firms-to-supply-14000-gpus/
• INDIAai | Pillars. (n.d.). IndiaAI. https://indiaai.gov.in/
• IndiaAI Innovation Challenge 2024 | Software Technology Park of India | Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology Government of India. (n.d.). http://stpi.in/en/events/indiaai-innovation-challenge-2024
• IndiaAI Mission To Deploy 14,000 GPUs For Compute Capacity, Starts Subsidy Plan. (2025, February 17). www.businessworld.in. Retrieved February 25, 2025, from https://www.businessworld.in/article/indiaai-mission-to-deploy-14000-gpus-for-compute-capacity-starts-subsidy-plan-548253
• India’s interesting AI initiatives in 2024: AI landscape in India. (n.d.). IndiaAI. https://indiaai.gov.in/article/india-s-interesting-ai-initiatives-in-2024-ai-landscape-in-india
• Mehra, P. (2025, February 17). Yotta joins India AI Mission to provide advanced GPU, AI cloud services. Techcircle. https://www.techcircle.in/2025/02/17/yotta-joins-india-ai-mission-to-provide-advanced-gpu-ai-cloud-services/
• IndiaAI 2023: Expert Group Report – First Edition. (n.d.). IndiaAI. https://indiaai.gov.in/news/indiaai-2023-expert-group-report-first-edition
• Satish, R., Mahindru, T., World Economic Forum, Microsoft, Butterfield, K. F., Sarkar, A., Roy, A., Kumar, R., Sethi, A., Ravindran, B., Marchant, G., Google, Havens, J., Srichandra (IEEE), Vatsa, M., Goenka, S., Anandan, P., Panicker, R., Srivatsa, R., . . . Kumar, R. (2021). Approach Document for India. In World Economic Forum Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Approach Document for India [Report]. https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2021-02/Responsible-AI-22022021.pdf
• Stratton, J. (2023, August 10). Those who solve the data dilemma will win the A.I. revolution. Fortune. https://fortune.com/2023/08/10/workday-data-ai-revolution/
• Suri, A. (n.d.). The missing pieces in India’s AI puzzle: talent, data, and R&D. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/02/the-missing-pieces-in-indias-ai-puzzle-talent-data-and-randd?lang=en
• The AI arms race. (2024, February 13). Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/21eb5996-89a3-11e8-bf9e-8771d5404543

‍

A war in the twenty-first century does not start when the first bullet or missile is fired. It begins much earlier, covertly, and without any official announcement. Cyberspace is this new battlefield. States now use a variety of ransomware, malicious codes, and disinformation campaigns to undermine their enemies' capabilities before launching an offensive. These pre-conflict cyber operations are now the primary frontline of contemporary hybrid warfare, which is changing how conflicts are fought and conducted.

‍

The Birth of a Digital Battlefield

‍

Hybrid Warfare is a blend of conventional military force with nonmilitary tactics like economic coercion, disinformation, and cyberattacks that have evolved rapidly in recent decades. Hybrid methods of warfare are nothing new, as the scale and sophistication of cyber operations in modern conflicts are unprecedented. Russia’s actions in Ukraine demonstrated the capability of digital tools to paralyse the critical systems before its heavy munitions could be deployed for combat operations. Within days of the 2022 invasions, Ukraine faced massive Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks targeting banks, government websites, and energy infrastructures. The digital frontlines have softened the physical defences long before the conventional warfare began. 

According to the FP Analytics’ “Digital Front Lines” Project, cyber operations are no longer an auxiliary tactic but a core component of hybrid warfare, blurring the boundary between peace and war. They enable states to exert pressure, gather intelligence, and disrupt adversaries, often without being attributed or held accountable. 

‍

Cyber Operations: The modern Prelude to War

‍

The use of digital technologies for surveillance, information network disruption, or critical infrastructure destruction is known as cyber operations. They are especially useful instruments for pre-conflict manipulation because of their ambiguity and stealth. Cyberattacks, in contrast to conventional military strikes, can accomplish strategic goals while providing plausible deniability.
Coordinated cyberattacks that spread misinformation and damaged public confidence disrupted government communication systems prior to Russia's invasion of Ukraine. These sorts of incidents highlight the integrated nature of cyber and kinetic operations, where digital assaults often serve as the initial phases of modern wars.

‍

The Expanding Spectrum of Actors or Threat 

‍

Cyberspace has democratized warfare, which once required an army, can now be initiated by a handful of skilled programmers with access to the right tools. The cyber landscape of the present times features a wide spectrum of threat actors, which can be understood as; 

• State actors like intelligence or military agencies conduct cyber operations as part of official foreign policy. 
• Cybercriminals pursue financial gains, often overlapping with political motives. 
• Terrorist groups use cyberspace to spread propaganda for coordinated attacks. 
• Cyber mercenaries being hired by both the state and nonstate clients can blur the ethical and legal boundaries. 

‍

This diversity can complicate the attribution by determining that anyone who is actively working behind conducting cyberattacks can be notoriously difficult, allowing the states to hide behind “plausible deniability.” This ‘Gray Zone’ of conflict below the threshold of a declared war, above mere diplomacy, has become the preferred arena for modern power struggles. 

‍

Civilian Involvement and Ethical Dilemmas

‍

Unlike traditional warfare, where the cyber domain entangles civilians as both participants and targets. Much of the nation’s critical infrastructure, which includes energy grids, hospitals, transportation, and communication systems, is owned and operated by private entities. As a result, the civilian industries and experts are becoming central to both cyber defence and offence. 

During the Russia–Ukraine War, the volunteer hackers from around the world were many of whom are being coordinated through the app Telegram, which is termed as ‘IT Army of Ukraine’, are known for conducting digital strikes on Russian networks. Conversely, the Russia-affiliated hacker groups like Conti had vowed to retaliate against any nations that supported Ukraine. 

This civilian participation raises profound legal and moral questions, over a private company’s role in defending their networks of becoming a combatant, or the impact of retaliatory cyberattacks on civilian infrastructure war crimes. International law has yet to provide a clear answer, which can leave dangerous gaps in the governance to counter cybercrimes. 

‍

Susceptibility of Contemporary Society to Cyber Warfare

‍
Cyberwarfare can impact an entire global digital ecosystem due to its interconnectedness. Power grids, hospitals, air traffic systems, and even automation devices can be compromised. While the NotPetya ransomware, which was cloaked as ransomware, caused billions of losses and caused worldwide economic damage from shipping companies to pharmaceutical companies, the WannaCry ransomware attacks in 2017 paralysed hospitals throughout the UK's National Health Service.

When taken as a whole, these incidents have also shown that cyberattacks are no longer limited to espionage situations and can have real-world consequences comparable to those of conventional warfare. The consequences of cyberattacks could increase dramatically as our dependence on technology increases. Because these effects are profoundly psychological in nature and seek to sow fear, mistrust, and social disintegration, they are not merely technical or economic in nature.

‍

The Future: Permanent Cyber Frontlines

‍

Technological developments have made cyberspace a permanent theatre of conflict, joining the land, sea, air, and space. Countries are currently making significant investments in cyber capabilities for deterrence as well as defence. According to security experts like Eriksson and Giacomello, societies are now inherently fragile due to our increasing reliance on information technologies.

Cyber operations in this context are about strategic dominance in a globalised world, not just digital espionage. Who controls the networks and algorithms that run contemporary civilisation will determine the future of war, not just who controls the skies or the seas. As per the new reality, before the drop of the first bomb, a silent war in cyberspace will already be underway.     

‍

References

‍

• https://digitalfrontlines.io/2023/05/25/the-evolution-of-cyber-operations-in-armed-conflict/
• https://theses.ubn.ru.nl/server/api/core/bitstreams/9d74149e-fb9a-402f-aa65-a90445ad7603/content
• https://cybersecurityguide.org/resources/cyberwarfare/
• https://re.public.polimi.it/retrieve/e0c31c0b-ce6c-4599-e053-1705fe0aef77/21%20Century%20Cyber%20Warfare.pdf