Small Scale Industries & DPDP Act Compliances

Executive Summary:

Apple has quickly responded to two severe zero-day threats, CVE-2024-44308 and CVE-2024-44309 in iOS, macOS, visionOS, and Safari. These defects, actively used in more focused attacks presumably by state actors, allow for code execution and cross-site scripting (XSS). In a report shared by Google’s Threat Analysis Group, the existing gaps prove that modern attacks are highly developed. Apple’s mitigation comprises memory management, especially state management to strengthen device security. Users are encouraged to update their devices as soon as possible, turn on automatic updates and be careful in the internet space to avoid these new threats.

Introduction

Apple has proved its devotion to the security issue releasing the updates fixing two zero-day bugs actively exploited by hackers. The bugs, with the IDs CVE-2024-44308 and CVE-2024-44309, are dangerous and can lead to code execution and cross-site scripting attacks. The vulnerabilities have been employed in attack and the significance of quick patch release for the safety of the users.

Vulnerabilities in Detail

The discovery of vulnerabilities (CVE-2024-44308, CVE-2024-44309) is credited to Clément Lecigne and Benoît Sevens of Google's Threat Analysis Group (TAG). These vulnerabilities were found in JavaScriptCore and WebKit, integral components of Apple’s web rendering framework. The details of these vulnerabilities are mentioned below:

CVE-2024-44308

• Severity: High (CVSS score: 8.8)
• Description: A flaw in the JavaScriptCore component of WebKit. Malicious web content could cause code to be executed on the target system and make the system vulnerable to the full control of the attacker.
• Technical Finding: This vulnerability involves bad handling of memory in the course of executing JavaScript, allowing the use of injected payloads remotely by the attackers.

CVE-2024-44309

• Severity: Moderate (CVSS score: 6.1)
• Description: A cookie management flaw in WebKit which might result in cross site scripting (XSS). This vulnerability enables the attackers to embed unauthorized scripts into genuine websites and endanger the privacy of users as well as their identities.
• Technical Finding: This issue arises because of wrong handling of cookies at the state level while processing the maliciously crafted web content and provides an unauthorized route to session data.

Affected Systems

These vulnerabilities impact a wide range of Apple devices and software versions:

• iOS 18.1.1 and iPadOS 18.1.1: For devices including iPhone XS and later, iPad Pro (13-inch), and iPad mini 5th generation onwards.
• iOS 17.7.2 and iPadOS 17.7.2: Supports earlier models such as iPad Pro (10.5-inch) and iPad Air 3rd generation.
• macOS Sequoia 15.1.1: Specifically targets systems running macOS Sequoia.
• visionOS 2.1.1: Exclusively for Apple Vision Pro.
• Safari 18.1.1: For Macs running macOS Ventura and Sonoma.

Apple's Mitigation Approach

Apple has implemented the following fixes:

• CVE-2024-44308: Enhanced input validation and robust memory checks to prevent arbitrary code execution.
• CVE-2024-44309: Improved state management to eliminate cookie mismanagement vulnerabilities.

These measures ensure stronger protection against exploitation and bolster the underlying security architecture of affected components.

Broader Implications

The exploitation of these zero-days highlights the evolving nature of threat landscapes:

• Increasing Sophistication: Attackers are refining techniques to target niche vulnerabilities, bypassing traditional defenses.
• Spyware Concerns: These flaws align with the modus operandi of spyware tools, potentially impacting privacy and national security.
• Call for Timely Updates: Users delaying updates inadvertently increase their risk exposure

Technical Recommendations for Users

To mitigate potential risks:

1. Update Devices Promptly: Install the latest patches for iOS, macOS, visionOS, and Safari.
2. Enable Automatic Updates: Ensures timely application of future patches.
3. Restrict WebKit Access: Avoid visiting untrusted websites until updates are installed.
4. Monitor System Behavior: Look for anomalies that could indicate exploitation.

‍

‍

Conclusion

The exploitation of CVE-2024-44308 and CVE-2024-44309 targeting Apple devices highlight the importance of timely software updates to protect users from potential exploitation. The swift action of Apple by providing immediate improved checks, state management and security patches. Users are therefore encouraged to install updates as soon as possible to guard against these zero day flaws.

References:

• https://support.apple.com/en-us/121752
• https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-44308
• https://securityonline.info/cve-2024-44308-and-cve-2024-44309-apple-addresses-zero-day-vulnerabilities/ 

‍

Overview:

The rapid digitization of educational institutions in India has created both opportunities and challenges. While technology has improved access to education and administrative efficiency, it has also exposed institutions to significant cyber threats. This report, published by CyberPeace, examines the types, causes, impacts, and preventive measures related to cyber risks in Indian educational institutions. It highlights global best practices, national strategies, and actionable recommendations to mitigate these threats.

‍

‍

‍

Significance of the Study:

The pandemic-induced shift to online learning, combined with limited cybersecurity budgets, has made educational institutions prime targets for cyberattacks. These threats compromise sensitive student, faculty, and institutional data, leading to operational disruptions, financial losses, and reputational damage. Globally, educational institutions face similar challenges, emphasizing the need for universal and localized responses.

Threat Faced by Education Institutions:

‍

Based on the insights from the CyberPeace’s report titled 'Exploring Cyber Threats and Digital Risks in Indian Educational Institutions', this concise blog provides a comprehensive overview of cybersecurity threats and risks faced by educational institutions, along with essential details to address these challenges.

🎣 Phishing: Phishing is a social engineering tactic where cyber criminals impersonate trusted sources to steal sensitive information, such as login credentials and financial details. It often involves deceptive emails or messages that lead to counterfeit websites, pressuring victims to provide information quickly. Variants include spear phishing, smishing, and vishing.

💰 Ransomware: Ransomware is malware that locks users out of their systems or data until a ransom is paid. It spreads through phishing emails, malvertising, and exploiting vulnerabilities, causing downtime, data leaks, and theft. Ransom demands can range from hundreds to hundreds of thousands of dollars.

🌐 Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS): DDoS attacks overwhelm servers, denying users access to websites and disrupting daily operations, which can hinder students and teachers from accessing learning resources or submitting assignments. These attacks are relatively easy to execute, especially against poorly protected networks, and can be carried out by amateur cybercriminals, including students or staff, seeking to cause disruptions for various reasons

🕵️ Cyber Espionage: Higher education institutions, particularly research-focused universities, are vulnerable to spyware, insider threats, and cyber espionage. Spyware is unauthorized software that collects sensitive information or damages devices. Insider threats arise from negligent or malicious individuals, such as staff or vendors, who misuse their access to steal intellectual property or cause data leaks..

🔒 Data Theft: Data theft is a major threat to educational institutions, which store valuable personal and research information. Cybercriminals may sell this data or use it for extortion, while stealing university research can provide unfair competitive advantages. These attacks can go undetected for long periods, as seen in the University of California, Berkeley breach, where hackers allegedly stole 160,000 medical records over several months.

🛠️ SQL Injection: SQL injection (SQLI) is an attack that uses malicious code to manipulate backend databases, granting unauthorized access to sensitive information like customer details. Successful SQLI attacks can result in data deletion, unauthorized viewing of user lists, or administrative access to the database.

🔍Eavesdropping attack: An eavesdropping breach, or sniffing, is a network attack where cybercriminals steal information from unsecured transmissions between devices. These attacks are hard to detect since they don't cause abnormal data activity. Attackers often use network monitors, like sniffers, to intercept data during transmission.

🤖 AI-Powered Attacks: AI enhances cyber attacks like identity theft, password cracking, and denial-of-service attacks, making them more powerful, efficient, and automated. It can be used to inflict harm, steal information, cause emotional distress, disrupt organizations, and even threaten national security by shutting down services or cutting power to entire regions

Insights from Project eKawach

‍

The CyberPeace Research Wing, in collaboration with SAKEC CyberPeace Center of Excellence (CCoE) and Autobot Infosec Private Limited, conducted a study simulating educational institutions' networks to gather intelligence on cyber threats. As part of the e-Kawach project, a nationwide initiative to strengthen cybersecurity, threat intelligence sensors were deployed to monitor internet traffic and analyze real-time cyber attacks from July 2023 to April 2024, revealing critical insights into the evolving cyber threat landscape.

Cyber Attack  Trends

‍

Between July 2023 and April 2024, the e-Kawach network recorded 217,886 cyberattacks from IP addresses worldwide, with a significant portion originating from countries including the United States, China, Germany, South Korea, Brazil, Netherlands, Russia, France, Vietnam, India, Singapore, and Hong Kong. However, attributing these attacks to specific nations or actors is complex, as threat actors often use techniques like exploiting resources from other countries, or employing VPNs and proxies to obscure their true locations, making it difficult to pinpoint the real origin of the attacks.

Brute Force Attack:

‍

The analysis uncovered an extensive use of automated tools in brute force attacks, with 8,337 unique usernames and 54,784 unique passwords identified. Among these, the most frequently targeted username was “root,” which accounted for over 200,000 attempts. Other commonly targeted usernames included: "admin", "test", "user", "oracle", "ubuntu", "guest", "ftpuser", "pi", "support"

Similarly, the study identified several weak passwords commonly targeted by attackers. “123456” was attempted over 3,500 times, followed by “password” with over 2,500 attempts. Other frequently targeted passwords included: "1234", "12345", "12345678", "admin", "123", "root", "test", "raspberry", "admin123", "123456789"

Insights from Threat Landscape Analysis

‍

Research done by the USI - CyberPeace Centre of Excellence (CCoE) and Resecurity has uncovered several breached databases belonging to public, private, and government universities in India, highlighting significant cybersecurity threats in the education sector. The research aims to identify and mitigate cybersecurity risks without harming individuals or assigning blame, based on data available at the time, which may evolve with new information. Institutions were assigned risk ratings that descend from A to F, with most falling under a D rating, indicating numerous security vulnerabilities. Institutions rated D or F are 5.4 times more likely to experience data breaches compared to those rated A or B. Immediate action is recommended to address the identified risks.

‍

Risk Findings :

‍

The risk findings for the institutions are summarized through a pie chart, highlighting factors such as data breaches, dark web activity, botnet activity, and phishing/domain squatting. Data breaches and botnet activity are significantly higher compared to dark web leakages and phishing/domain squatting. The findings show 393,518 instances of data breaches, 339,442 instances of botnet activity, 7,926 instances related to the dark web and phishing & domain activity - 6711.

‍

Key Indicators:  Multiple instances of data breaches containing credentials (email/passwords) in plain text.

• Botnet activity indicating network hosts compromised by malware.

• Credentials from third-party government and non-governmental websites linked to official institutional emails

• Details of software applications, drivers installed on compromised hosts.

‍

• Sensitive cookie data exfiltrated from various browsers.

‍

• IP addresses of compromised systems.
• Login credentials for different Android applications.

Below is the sample detail of one of the top educational institutions that provides the insights about the higher rate of data breaches, botnet activity, dark web activities and phishing & domain squatting. 

Risk Detection: 

It indicates the number of data breaches, network hygiene, dark web activities, botnet activities, cloud security, phishing & domain squatting, media monitoring and miscellaneous risks. In the below example, we are able to see the highest number of data breaches and botnet activities in the sample particular domain.

Risk Changes:

Risk by Categories:

Risk is categorized with factors such as high, medium and low, the risk is at high level for data breaches and botnet activities.

Challenges Faced by Educational Institutions

‍

Educational institutions face cyberattack risks, the challenges leading to cyberattack incidents in educational institutions are as follows:

🔒 Lack of a Security Framework: A key challenge in cybersecurity for educational institutions is the lack of a dedicated framework for higher education. Existing frameworks like ISO 27001, NIST, COBIT, and ITIL are designed for commercial organizations and are often difficult and costly to implement. Consequently, many educational institutions in India do not have a clearly defined cybersecurity framework.

🔑 Diverse User Accounts: Educational institutions manage numerous accounts for staff, students, alumni, and third-party contractors, with high user turnover. The continuous influx of new users makes maintaining account security a challenge, requiring effective systems and comprehensive security training for all users.

📚 Limited Awareness: Cybersecurity awareness among students, parents, teachers, and staff in educational institutions is limited due to the recent and rapid integration of technology. The surge in tech use, accelerated by the pandemic, has outpaced stakeholders' ability to address cybersecurity issues, leaving them unprepared to manage or train others on these challenges.

📱 Increased Use of Personal/Shared Devices: The growing reliance on unvetted personal/Shared devices for academic and administrative activities amplifies security risks.

💬 Lack of Incident Reporting: Educational institutions often neglect reporting cyber incidents, increasing vulnerability to future attacks. It is essential to report all cases, from minor to severe, to strengthen cybersecurity and institutional resilience.

Impact of Cybersecurity Attacks on Educational Institutions

‍

Cybersecurity attacks on educational institutions lead to learning disruptions, financial losses, and data breaches. They also harm the institution's reputation and pose security risks to students. The following are the impacts of cybersecurity attacks on educational institutions:

📚Impact on the Learning Process: A report by the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that cyberattacks on school districts resulted in learning losses ranging from three days to three weeks, with recovery times taking between two to nine months.

💸Financial Loss: US schools reported financial losses ranging from $50,000 to $1 million due to expenses like hardware replacement and cybersecurity upgrades, with recovery taking an average of 2 to 9 months.

🔒Data Security Breaches: Cyberattacks exposed sensitive data, including grades, social security numbers, and bullying reports. Accidental breaches were often caused by staff, accounting for 21 out of 25 cases, while intentional breaches by students, comprising 27 out of 52 cases, frequently involved tampering with grades.

⚠️Data Security Breach: Cyberattacks on schools result in breaches of personal information, including grades and social security numbers, causing emotional, physical, and financial harm. These breaches can be intentional or accidental, with a US study showing staff responsible for most accidental breaches (21 out of 25) and students primarily behind intentional breaches (27 out of 52) to change grades.

🏫Impact on Institutional Reputation: Cyberattacks damaged the reputation of educational institutions, eroding trust among students, staff, and families. Negative media coverage and scrutiny impacted staff retention, student admissions, and overall credibility.

🛡️ Impact on Student Safety: ‍‍Cyberattacks compromised student safety and privacy. For example, breaches like live-streaming school CCTV footage caused severe distress, negatively impacting students' sense of security and mental well-being.

CyberPeace Advisory:

‍

CyberPeace emphasizes the importance of vigilance and proactive measures to address cybersecurity risks:

1. Develop effective incident response plans: Establish a clear and structured plan to quickly identify, respond to, and recover from cyber threats. Ensure that staff are well-trained and know their roles during an attack to minimize disruption and prevent further damage.
   
   
2. Implement access controls with role-based permissions: Restrict access to sensitive information based on individual roles within the institution. This ensures that only authorized personnel can access certain data, reducing the risk of unauthorized access or data breaches.
   
   
3. Regularly update software and conduct cybersecurity training: Keep all software and systems up-to-date with the latest security patches to close vulnerabilities. Provide ongoing cybersecurity awareness training for students and staff to equip them with the knowledge to prevent attacks, such as phishing.
   
   
4. Ensure regular and secure backups of critical data: Perform regular backups of essential data and store them securely in case of cyber incidents like ransomware. This ensures that, if data is compromised, it can be restored quickly, minimizing downtime.
   
   
5. Adopt multi-factor authentication (MFA): Enforce Multi-Factor Authentication(MFA) for accessing sensitive systems or information to strengthen security. MFA adds an extra layer of protection by requiring users to verify their identity through more than one method, such as a password and a one-time code.
   
   
6. Deploy anti-malware tools: Use advanced anti-malware software to detect, block, and remove malicious programs. This helps protect institutional systems from viruses, ransomware, and other forms of malware that can compromise data security.
   
   
7. Monitor networks using intrusion detection systems (IDS): Implement IDS to monitor network traffic and detect suspicious activity. By identifying threats in real time, institutions can respond quickly to prevent breaches and minimize potential damage.
   
   
8. Conduct penetration testing: Regularly conduct penetration testing to simulate cyberattacks and assess the security of institutional networks. This proactive approach helps identify vulnerabilities before they can be exploited by actual attackers.
   
   
9. Collaborate with cybersecurity firms: Partner with cybersecurity experts to benefit from specialized knowledge and advanced security solutions. Collaboration provides access to the latest technologies, threat intelligence, and best practices to enhance the institution's overall cybersecurity posture.
   
   
10. Share best practices across institutions: Create forums for collaboration among educational institutions to exchange knowledge and strategies for cybersecurity. Sharing successful practices helps build a collective defense against common threats and improves security across the education sector.

‍

‍

Conclusion: 

‍

The increasing cyber threats to Indian educational institutions demand immediate attention and action. With vulnerabilities like data breaches, botnet activities, and outdated infrastructure, institutions must prioritize effective cybersecurity measures. By adopting proactive strategies such as regular software updates, multi-factor authentication, and incident response plans, educational institutions can mitigate risks and safeguard sensitive data. Collaborative efforts, awareness, and investment in cybersecurity will be essential to creating a secure digital environment for academia.

‍

Recent Incidents:

Recent reports are revealing a significant security threat linked to a new infostealer based malware campaign known to solely target gaming accounts. This attack has affected users of Activision and other gaming websites. The sophisticated software has captured millions of login credentials, notably from the cheats and players. The officials at Activision Blizzard, an American video game holding company, are still investigating the matter and collaborating with cheated developers to minimize the impact and inform the accounts’ residents of appropriate safety measures.

Overview:

Infostealer, also known as information stealer, is a type of malware designed in the form of a Trojan virus for stealing private data from the infected system. It can have a variety of incarnations and collect user data of various types such as browser history, passwords, credit card numbers, and login details and credentials to social media, gaming platforms, bank accounts, and other websites. Bad actors use the log obtained as a result of the collection of personal records to access the victim’s financial accounts, appropriate the victim’s online identity, and perform fraudulent actions on behalf of the victim.

Modus Operandi:

• Infosteale­r is a malicious program created to illegally obtain pe­ople's login details, like use­rnames and passwords. Its goal is to enable cybe­rattacks, sell on dark web markets, or pursue­ malicious aims.

• This malware targets both personal de­vices and corporate systems. It spre­ads through methods like phishing emails, harmful we­bsites, and infected public site­s.

• Once inside a device­, Infostealer secre­tly gathers sensitive data like­ passwords, account details, and personal information. It's designe­d to infiltrate systems being undete­cted. The stolen cre­dentials are compiled into datalogs. The­se logs are then sold ille­gally on dark web marketplaces for profit.

Analysis: 

‍

‍

Basic properties:

• MD5: 06f53d457c530635b34aef0f04c59c7d
• SHA-1: 7e30c3aee2e4398ddd860d962e787e1261be38fb
• SHA-256: aeecc65ac8f0f6e10e95a898b60b43bf6ba9e2c0f92161956b1725d68482721d
• Vhash: 145076655d155515755az4e?z4
• Authentihash: 65b5ecd5bca01a9a4bf60ea4b88727e9e0c16b502221d5565ae8113f9ad2f878
• Imphash: f4a69846ab44cc1bedeea23e3b680256
• Rich PE header hash: ba3da6e3c461234831bf6d4a6d8c8bff 
• SSDEEP: 6144:YcdXHqXTdlR/YXA6eV3E9MsnhMuO7ZStApGJiZcX8aVEKn3js7/FQAMyzSzdyBk8:YIKXd/UgGXS5U+SzdjTnE3V
• TLSH:T1E1B4CF8E679653EAC472823DCC232595E364FB009267875AC25702D3EFBB3D56C29F90
• File type: Win32 DLL executable windows win32 pepe dll
• Magic: PE32+ executable (DLL) (GUI) x86-64, for MS Windows
• File size: 483.50 KB (495104 bytes)

Additional Hash Files:

• 160389696ed7f37f164f1947eda00830
• 229a758e232aeb49196c862655797e12
• 23e4ac5e7db3d5a898ea32d27e8b7661
• 3440cced6ec7ab38c6892a17fd368cf8
• 36d7da7306241979b17ca14a6c060b92
• 38d2264ff74123f3113f8617fabc49f6
• 3c5c693ba9b161fa1c1c67390ff22c96
• 3e0fe537124e6154233aec156652a675
• 4571090142554923f9a248cb9716a1ae
• 4e63f63074eb85e722b7795ec78aeaa3
• 63dd2d927adce034879b114d209b23de
• 642aa70b188eb7e76273130246419f1d
• 6ab9c636fb721e00b00098b476c49d19
• 71b4de8b5a1c5a973d8c23a20469d4ec
• 736ce04f4c8f92bda327c69bb55ed2fc
• 7acfddc5dfd745cc310e6919513a4158
• 7d96d4b8548693077f79bc18b0f9ef21
• 8737c4dc92bd72805b8eaf9f0ddcc696
• 9b9ff0d65523923a70acc5b24de1921f
• 9f7c1fffd565cb475bbe963aafab77ff

Indicators of Compromise:

• Unusual Outbound Network Traffic: An increase in odd or questionable outbound network traffic may be a sign that infostealer malware has accessed more data.

• Anomalies in Privileged User Account Activity: Unusual behavior or illegal access are two examples of irregular actions that might indicate a breach in privileged user accounts.

• Suspicious Registry or System File Changes: Infostealer malware may be trying to alter system settings if there are any unexpected changes to system files, registry settings, or configurations.

• Unusual  DNS queries: When communicating with command and control servers or rerouting traffic, infostealer malware may produce strange DNS queries.

• Unexpected System Patching: Unexpected or unauthorized system patching by unidentified parties may indicate that infostealer malware has compromised the system and is trying to hide its footprint or become persistent. 

• Phishing emails and social engineering attempts:  It is a  popular strategy employed by cybercriminals to get confidential data or implant malicious software. To avoid compromise, it is crucial to be wary of dubious communications and attempts of social engineering.

Recommendations:

• Be Vigilant: In today's digital world, many cybercrime­s threaten online safe­ty, Phishing tricks, fake web pages, and bad links pose­ real dangers. Carefully che­ck email sources. Examine we­bsites closely. Use top se­curity programs. Follow safe browsing rules. Update software­ often. Share safety tips. The­se steps reduce­ risks. They help kee­p your online presence­ secure.

• Regular use of Anti-Virus Software to detect the threats: Antivirus tools are vital for finding and stopping cybe­r threats. These programs use­ signature detection and be­havior analysis to identify known malicious code and suspicious activities. Updating virus de­finitions and software-patches regularly, improve­s their ability to detect ne­w threats. This helps maintain system se­curity and data integrity.

• Provide security related training to the employees and common employees: One should learn Cybe­rsecurity and the best practice­s in order to keep the­ office safe. Common workers will ge­t lessons on spotting risks and responding well, cre­ating an environment of caution.

• Keep changing passwords: Passwords should be changed fre­quently for better se­curity. Rotating passwords often makes it harder for cybe­r criminals to compromise and make it happen or confidential data to be­ stolen. This practice keeps intruders out and shie­lds sensitive intel.

Conclusion:

To conclude, to reduce the impact and including the safety measures, further investigations and collaboration are already in the pipeline regarding the recent malicious software that takes advantage of gamers and has stated that about millions of credentials users have been compromised. To protect sensitive data, continued usage of antivirus software, use of trusted materials  and password changes are the key elements. The ways to decrease risks and safely protect sensitive information are to develop improved Cybersecurity methods such as multi-factor authentication and the conduct of security audits frequently. Be safe and be vigilant.

Reference:

• https://techcrunch.com/2024/03/28/activision-says-its-investigating-password-stealing-malware-targeting-game-players/
• https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/activision-enable-2fa-to-secure-accounts-recently-stolen-by-malware/
• https://cyber.vumetric.com/security-news/2024/03/29/activision-enable-2fa-to-secure-accounts-recently-stolen-by-malware/
• https://www.virustotal.com/
• https://otx.alienvault.com/

‍