India's Visionary Roadmaps for Cyber Defense and Innovation

The Digital Covenant: Aligning Communication with SDG Goals

“Rethinking Communication, Cyber Responsibility, and Sustainability in a Connected World”

Introduction

It is rightly said by Antonio Guterres, United Nations Secretary General, “Everyone should be able to express themselves freely without fear of attack. Everyone should be able to access a range of views and information sources.”  In 2024, when the Global Alliance for PR and Communication Management asserted that it aligns with the era of digital transformation, where technology is moving at terminal velocity and bringing various risks and threats, it called on the global leaders and stakeholders to proclaim ‘Responsible Communication’ as the 18th Sustainable Development Goal (SDG). On May 17th, as we celebrate World Telecommunication and Information Society Day (WTISD) 2025, we must align our personal, professional, and virtual spaces with a safe and sustainable information age. 

In terms of digital growth, it is indubitable that India is growing at a brisk pace consistently in alignment with its South Asian and Western counterparts and has incorporated international covenants on digital personal data and cyber crimes within its domestic regime. 

UN Global Principles for Information Integrity 

The United Nations has displayed its constant commitment to the achievement of the seventeen SDGs that were adopted at the United Nations Conference in 2012 in Rio de Janeiro. It recognises that you cannot isolate the digital transformation, technology, and digitisation from other areas that are included within the SDGs, such as health, education, and poverty. The UN released Policy Brief 8 in June 2023 by the UN Secretary-General that seeks to empirically derive data on the threats posed to information integrity and then come up with norms that help guide the member states, the digital platforms, and other stakeholders. The norms must be in conformity with the right to freedom of opinion and expression and the right to information access. 

In line with its agenda, it has formulated Global Principles of Information Integrity, which include “Societal Trust and Resilience”, “Healthy Incentives”, “Public Empowerment”, “Independent, Free and Pluralistic Media” and “Transparency and Research”. The principles recognise the harm caused by hatred, misinformation, and disinformation propagated by the misuse of advances in  Artificial Intelligence Technology (AI).

Breaking the Binary: Bridging the Gender Digital Divide

The reflection of how far we have come and how far we have to go can be deciphered with a single sentence, i.e., using digital technologies to promote gender equality. This can be seen both as a paradox and a pressing call to action. As we celebrate WTISD 2025, the day highlights the fundamental role of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in accelerating progress and bringing those not included in this digital transformation to become a part of this change, especially the female population that remains isolated from mainstream growth. As per the data given by ITU, “Out of the world population, 70 per cent of men are using the internet, compared with 65 per cent of women.”

This exclusion is not merely a technical gap but a societal and economic chasm, reinforcing existing inequalities. By including such an important goal in the theme of this day, it marks a critical moment towards the formation of gender-sensitive digital policies, promoting digital literacy among women and girls, and ensuring safe, affordable, and meaningful connectivity. We can explore the future potential where technology is the true instrument for gender parity, not a mirror of old hierarchies. 

India and its courts have time and again proven their commitment to cultivating digital transformation as an inherent strength to bridge this digital divide, and the recent judgement where the court declared the right to digital access an intrinsic part of the right to life and liberty is a single instance among many.

CyberPeace Resolution on World Telecommunication and Information Society Day 

CyberPeace is actively bridging the gap between digital safety and sustainable development through its initiatives, aligning with the principles of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The ‘CyberPeace Corps’ empowers communities by fostering cyber hygiene awareness and building digital resilience. The ‘CyberPeace Initiative’, a project with Google.org, tackles digital misinformation, promoting informed online engagement. Additionally, Digital Shakti, now in its fifth phase, empowers women by enhancing their digital literacy and safety. These are just a few of the many impactful initiatives by CyberPeace, aimed at creating a safer and more inclusive digital future. Together, we are spreading awareness and strengthening the foundation for a safer and more inclusive digital future and promoting responsible tech use. Let us be resolute on this World Telecommunication and Information Society Day for “Clean Data. Safe Clicks. Stronger Future. Pledge to Cyber Hygiene Today!”

References

• https://www.un.org/en/observances/telecommunication-day

‍

Introduction

The term ‘super spreader’ is used to refer to social media and digital platform accounts that are able to quickly transmit information to a significantly large audience base in a short duration. The analogy references the medical term, where a small group of individuals is able to rapidly amplify the spread of an infection across a huge population. The fact that a few handful accounts are able to impact and influence many is attributed to a number of factors like large follower bases, high engagement rates, content attractiveness or virality and perceived credibility.

Super spreader accounts have become a considerable threat on social media because they are responsible for generating a large amount of low-credibility material online. These individuals or groups may create or disseminate low-credibility content for a number of reasons, running from social media fame to garnering political influence, from intentionally spreading propaganda to seeking financial gains. Given the exponential reach of these accounts, identifying, tracing and categorising such accounts as the sources of misinformation can be tricky. It can be equally difficult to actually recognise the content they spread for the misinformation that it actually is. 

How Do A Few Accounts Spark Widespread Misinformation? 

Recent research suggests that misinformation superspreaders, who consistently distribute low-credibility content, may be the primary cause of the issue of widespread misinformation about different topics. A study[1] by a team of social media analysts at Indiana University has found that a significant portion of tweets spreading misinformation are sent by a small percentage of a given user base. The researchers conducted a review of 2,397,388 tweets posted on Twitter (now X) that were flagged as having low credibility and details on who was sending them. The study found that it does not take a lot of influencers to sway the beliefs and opinions of large numbers. This is attributed to the impact of what they describe as superspreaders. The researchers collected 10 months of data, which added up to 2,397,388 tweets sent by 448,103 users, and then reviewed it, looking for tweets that were flagged as containing low-credibility information. They found that approximately a third of the low-credibility tweets had been posted by people using just 10 accounts, and that just 1,000 accounts were responsible for posting approximately 70% of such tweets.[2]

Case Study

1. How Misinformation ‘Superspreaders’ Seed False Election Theories

During the 2020 U.S. presidential election, a small group of "repeat spreaders" aggressively pushed false election claims across various social media platforms for political gain, and this even led to rallies and radicalisation in the U.S.[3] Superspreaders accounts were responsible for disseminating a disproportionately large amount of misinformation related to the election, influencing public opinion and potentially undermining the electoral process.

In the domestic context, India was ranked highest for the risk of misinformation and disinformation according to experts surveyed for the World Economic Forum’s 2024 Global Risk Report. In today's digital age, misinformation, deep fakes, and AI-generated fakes pose a significant threat to the integrity of elections and democratic processes worldwide. With 64 countries conducting elections in 2024, the dissemination of false information carries grave implications that could influence outcomes and shape long-term socio-political landscapes. During the 2024 Indian elections, we witnessed a notable surge in deepfake videos of political personalities, raising concerns about the influence of misinformation on election outcomes.

2. Role of Superspreaders During Covid-19

Clarity in public health communication is important when any grey areas or gaps in information can be manipulated so quickly. During the COVID-19 pandemic, misinformation related to the virus, vaccines, and public health measures spread rapidly on social media platforms, including Twitter (Now X). Some prominent accounts or popular pages on platforms like Facebook and Twitter(now X) were identified as superspreaders of COVID-19 misinformation, contributing to public confusion and potentially hindering efforts to combat the pandemic.

As per the Center for Countering Digital Hate Inc (US), The "disinformation dozen," a group of 12 prominent anti-vaccine accounts[4], were found to be responsible for a large amount of anti-vaccine content circulating on social media platforms, highlighting the significant role of superspreaders in influencing public perceptions and behaviours during a health crisis.

There are also incidents where users are unknowingly engaged in spreading misinformation by forwarding information or content which are not always shared by the original source but often just propagated by amplifiers, using other sources, websites, or YouTube videos that help in dissemination. The intermediary sharers amplify these messages on their pages, which is where it takes off. Hence such users do not always have to be the ones creating or deliberately popularising the misinformation, but they are the ones who expose more people to it because of their broad reach. This was observed during the pandemic when a handful of people were able to create a heavy digital impact sharing vaccine/virus-related misinformation. 

3. Role of Superspreaders in Influencing Investments and Finance

Misinformation and rumours in finance may have a considerable influence on stock markets, investor behaviour, and national financial stability. Individuals or accounts with huge followings or influence in the financial niche can operate as superspreaders of erroneous information, potentially leading to market manipulation, panic selling, or incorrect impressions about individual firms or investments.

Superspreaders in the finance domain can cause volatility in markets, affect investor confidence, and even trigger regulatory responses to address the spread of false information that may harm market integrity. In fact, there has been a rise in deepfake videos, and fake endorsements, with multiple social media profiles providing unsanctioned investing advice and directing followers to particular channels. This leads investors into dangerous financial decisions. The issue intensifies when scammers employ deepfake videos of notable personalities to boost their reputation and can actually shape people’s financial decisions. 

Bots and Misinformation Spread on Social Media

Bots are automated accounts that are designed to execute certain activities, such as liking, sharing, or retweeting material, and they can broaden the reach of misinformation by swiftly spreading false narratives and adding to the virality of a certain piece of content. They can also artificially boost the popularity of disinformation by posting phony likes, shares, and comments, making it look more genuine and trustworthy to unsuspecting users. Bots can exploit social network algorithms by establishing false identities that interact with one another and with real users, increasing the spread of disinformation and pushing it to the top of users' feeds and search results.

Bots can use current topics or hashtags to introduce misinformation into popular conversations, allowing misleading information to acquire traction and reach a broader audience. They can lead to the construction of echo chambers, in which users are exposed to a narrow variety of perspectives and information, exacerbating the spread of disinformation inside restricted online groups. There are incidents reported where bot's were found as the sharers of content from low-credibility sources.

Bots are frequently employed as part of planned misinformation campaigns designed to propagate false information for political, ideological, or commercial gain. Bots, by automating the distribution of misleading information, can make it impossible to trace the misinformation back to its source. Understanding how bots work and their influence on information ecosystems is critical for combatting disinformation and increasing digital literacy among social media users.

CyberPeace Policy Recommendations

1. Recommendations/Advisory for Netizens:

1. Educating oneself: Netizens need to stay informed about current events, reliable fact-checking sources, misinformation counter-strategies, and common misinformation tactics, so that they can verify potentially problematic content before sharing.
2. Recognising the threats and vulnerabilities: It is important for netizens to understand the consequences of spreading or consuming inaccurate information, fake news, or misinformation. Netizens must be cautious of sensationalised content spreading on social media as it might attempt to provoke strong reactions or to mold public opinions. Netizens must consider questioning the credibility of information, verifying its sources, and developing cognitive skills to identify low-credibility content and counter misinformation.
3. Practice caution and skepticism: Netizens are advised to develop a healthy skepticism towards online information, and critically analyse the veracity of all information sources. Before spreading any strong opinions or claims, one must seek supporting evidence,  factual data, and expert opinions, and verify and validate claims with reliable sources or fact-checking entities.
4. Good netiquette on the Internet, thinking before forwarding any information: It is important for netizens to practice good netiquette in the online information landscape. One must exercise caution while sharing any information, especially if the information seems incorrect, unverified or controversial. It's important to critically examine facts and recognise and understand the implications of sharing false, manipulative, misleading or fake information/content. Netizens must also promote critical thinking and encourage their loved ones to think critically, verify information, seek reliable sources and counter misinformation.
5. Adopting and promoting Prebunking and Debunking strategies: Prebunking and debunking are two effective strategies to counter misinformation. Netizens are advised to engage in sharing only accurate information and do fact-checking to debunk any misinformation. They can rely on reputable fact-checking experts/entities who are regularly engaged in producing prebunking and debunking reports and material. Netizens are further advised to familiarise themselves with fact-checking websites, and resources and verify the information.

2. Recommendations for tech/social media platforms 

1. Detect, report and block malicious accounts: Tech/social media platforms must implement strict user authentication mechanisms to verify account holders' identities to minimise the formation of fraudulent or malicious accounts. This is imperative to weed out suspicious social media accounts, misinformation superspreader accounts and bots accounts. Platforms must be capable of analysing public content, especially viral or suspicious content to ascertain whether it is misleading, AI-generated, fake or deliberately misleading. Upon detection, platform operators must block malicious/ superspreader accounts. The same approach must apply to other community guidelines’ violations as well. 
2. Algorithm Improvements: Tech/social media platform operators must develop and deploy advanced algorithm mechanisms to detect suspicious accounts and recognise repetitive posting of misinformation. They can utilise advanced algorithms to identify such patterns and flag any misleading, inaccurate, or fake information.
3. Dedicated Reporting Tools: It is important for the tech/social media platforms to adopt robust policies to take action against social media accounts engaged in malicious activities such as spreading misinformation, disinformation, and propaganda. They must empower users on the platforms to flag/report suspicious accounts, and misleading content or misinformation through user-friendly reporting tools.
4. Holistic Approach: The battle against online mis/disinformation necessitates a thorough examination of the processes through which it spreads. This involves investing in information literacy education, modifying algorithms to provide exposure to varied viewpoints, and working on detecting malevolent bots that spread misleading information. Social media sites can employ similar algorithms internally to eliminate accounts that appear to be bots. All stakeholders must encourage digital literacy efforts that enable consumers to critically analyse information, verify sources, and report suspect content. Implementing prebunking and debunking strategies. These efforts can be further supported by collaboration with relevant entities such as cybersecurity experts, fact-checking entities, researchers, policy analysts and the government to combat the misinformation warfare on the Internet.  

References:

1. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0302201 {1}
2. https://phys.org/news/2024-05-superspreaders-responsible-large-portion-misinformation.html#google_vignette {2}
3. https://phys.org/news/2024-05-superspreaders-responsible-large-portion-misinformation.html#google_vignette {3}
4. https://counterhate.com/research/the-disinformation-dozen/ {4}
5. https://phys.org/news/2024-05-superspreaders-responsible-large-portion-misinformation.html#google_vignette
6. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0302201
7. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/23/technology/election-misinformation-facebook-twitter.html
8. https://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2021/08/06/vaccine-misinformation-and-a-look-inside-the-disinformation-dozen
9. https://healthfeedback.org/misinformation-superspreaders-thriving-on-musk-owned-twitter/
10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8139392/
11. https://www.jmir.org/2021/5/e26933/
12. https://www.yahoo.com/news/7-ways-avoid-becoming-misinformation-121939834.html

‍

Executive Summary:

New Linux malware has been discovered by a cybersecurity firm Volexity, and this new strain of malware is being referred to as DISGOMOJI. A Pakistan-based threat actor alias ‘UTA0137’ has been identified as having espionage aims, with its primary focus on Indian government entities.  Like other common forms of backdoors and botnets involved in different types of cyberattacks, DISGOMOJI, the malware  allows the use of commands to capture screenshots, search for files to steal, spread additional payloads, and transfer files. DISGOMOJI  uses Discord (messaging service)  for Command & Control (C2)  and uses emojis  for C2 communication. This malware targets Linux operating systems.

The DISCOMOJI Malware:  

• The DISGOMOJI malware opens a specific channel in a Discord server and every new channel corresponds to a new victim. This means that the attacker can communicate with the victim one at a time.

• This particular malware connects with the attacker-controlled Discord server using Emoji, a form of relay protocol. The attacker provides unique emojis as instructions, and the malware uses emojis as a feedback to the subsequent command status.

• For instance, the ‘camera with flash’ emoji is used to screenshots the device of the victim or to steal, the ‘fox’ emoji cracks all Firefox profiles, and the ‘skull’ emoji kills the malware process.

• This C2 communication is done using emojis to ensure messaging between infected contacts, and it is almost impossible for Discord to shut down the malware as it can always change the account details of Discord it is using once the maliciou server is blocked.

• The malware also has capabilities aside from the emoji-based C2 such as network probing, tunneling, and data theft that are needed to help the UTA0137 threat actor in achieving its espionage goals.

Specific emojis used for different commands by UTA0137:

• Camera with Flash (📸): Captures a picture of the target device’s screen as per the victim’s directions.

• Backhand Index Pointing Down (👇): Extracts files from the targeted device and sends them to the command channel in the form of attachments.

• Backhand Index Pointing Right (👉): This process involves sending a file found on the victim’s device to another web-hosted file storage service known as Oshi or oshi[. ]at.

• Backhand Index Pointing Left (👈): Sends a file from the victim’s device to transfer[. ]sh, which is an online service for sharing files on the Internet.

• Fire (🔥): Finds and transmits all files with certain extensions that exist on the victim’s device, such as *. txt, *. doc, *. xls, *. pdf, *. ppt, *. rtf, *. log, *. cfg, *. dat, *. db, *. mdb, *. odb, *. sql, *. json, *. xml, *. php, *. asp, *. pl, *. sh, *. py, *. ino, *. cpp, *. java,

• Fox (🦊): This works by compressing all Firefox related profiles in the affected device. 

• Skull (💀): Kills the malware process in windows using ‘os. Exit()’

• Man Running (🏃‍♂️):  Execute a command on a victim’s device. This command receives an argument, which is the command to execute.

• Index Pointing up (👆) : Upload a file to the victim's device. The file to upload is attached along with this emoji

Analysis:   

The analysis was carried out for one of the indicator of compromised SHA-256 hash file-  C981aa1f05adf030bacffc0e279cf9dc93cef877f7bce33ee27e9296363cf002.

It is found that most of the vendors have marked the file as trojan in virustotal and the graph explains the malicious nature of the contacted domains and IPs.

‍

Discord & C2 Communication  for UTA0137:

• Stealthiness: Discord is a well-known messaging platform used for different purposes, which means that sending any messages or files on the server should not attract suspicion. Such stealthiness makes it possible for UTA0137 to remain dormant for greater periods before launching an attack.

• Customization: UTA0137 connected to Discord is able to create specific channels for distinct victims on the server. Such a framework allows the attackers to communicate with each of the victims individually to make a process more accurate and efficient.

• Emoji-based protocol: For C2 communication, emojis really complicates the attempt that Discord might make to interfere with the operations of the malware. In case the malicious server gets banned, malware could easily be recovered, especially by using the Discord credentials from the C2 server.

• Persistence: The malware, as stated above, has the ability to perpetually exist to hack the system and withstand rebooting of systems so that the virus can continue to operate without being detected by the owner of the hacked system.

• Advanced capabilities: Other features of DISGOMOJI are the Network Map using Nmap scanner, network tunneling through Chisel and Ligolo and Data Exfiltration by File Sharing services. These capabilities thus help in aiding the espionage goals of UTA0137.

• Social engineering: The virus and the trojan can show the pop-up windows and prompt messages, for example the fake update for firefox and similar applications, where the user can be tricked into inputting the password.

• Dynamic credential fetching: The malware does not write the hardcoded values of the credentials in order to connect it to the discord server. This also inconveniences analysts as they are unable to easily locate the position of the C2 server.

• Bogus informational and error messages: They never show any real information or errors because they do not want one to decipher the malicious behavior easily.

Recommendations to mitigate the risk of UTA0137:

• Regularly Update Software and Firmware: It is essential to regularly update all the application software and firmware of different devices, particularly, routers, to prevent hackers from exploiting the discovered and disclosed flaws. This includes fixing bugs such as CVE-2024-3080 and CVE-2024-3912 on ASUS routers, which basically entails solving a set of problems.

• Implement Multi-Factor Authentication: There are statistics that show how often user accounts are attacked, it is important to incorporate multi-factor authentication to further secure the accounts.

• Deploy Advanced Malware Protection: Provide robust guard that will help the user recognize and prevent the execution of the DISGOMOJI malware and similar threats.

• Enhance Network Segmentation: Utilize stringent network isolation mechanisms that seek to compartmentalize the key systems and data from the rest of the network in order to minimize the attack exposure.

• Monitor Network Activity: Scanning Network hour to hour for identifying and handling the security breach and the tools such as Nmap, Chisel, Ligolo etc can be used.

• Utilize Threat Intelligence: To leverage advanced threats intelligence which will help you acquire knowledge on previous threats and vulnerabilities and take informed actions.

• Secure Communication Channels: Mitigate the problem of the leakage of developers’ credentials and ways of engaging with the discord through loss of contact to prevent abusing attacks or gaining control over Discord as an attack vector.

• Enforce Access Control: Regularly review and update the user authentication processes by adopting stricter access control measures that will allow only the right personnel to access the right systems and information.

• Conduct Regular Security Audits: It is important to engage in security audits periodically in an effort to check some of the weaknesses present within the network or systems.

• Implement Incident Response Plan: Conduct a risk assessment, based on that design and establish an efficient incident response kit that helps in the early identification, isolation, and management of security breaches.

• Educate Users: Educate users on cybersecurity hygiene, opportunities to strengthen affinity with the University, and conduct retraining on threats like phishing and social engineering.

Conclusion:

The new threat actor named UTA0137 from Pakistan who was utilizing DISGOMOJI malware to attack Indian government institutions using embedded emojis with a command line through the Discord app was discovered by Volexity. It has the capability to exfiltrate and aims to steal the data of government entities. The UTA0137 was continuously improved over time to permanently communicate with victims. It underlines the necessity of having strong protection from viruses and hacker attacks, using secure passwords and unique codes every time, updating the software more often and having high-level anti-malware tools. Organizations can minimize advanced threats, the likes of DISGOMOJI and protect sensitive data by improving network segmentation, continuous monitoring of activities, and users’ awareness.

References:

https://otx.alienvault.com/pulse/66712446e23b1d14e4f293eb

https://thehackernews.com/2024/06/pakistani-hackers-use-disgomoji-malware.html?m=1

https://cybernews.com/news/hackers-using-emojis-to-command-malware/

https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/news/disgomoji-new-linux-malware-uses-emojis-for-command-execution/

https://www.volexity.com/blog/2024/06/13/disgomoji-malware-used-to-target-indian-government/

‍