DPDP Bill 2023 A Comparative Analysis

Executive Summary:

‍
A viral video circulating on social media platforms, claimed to show the final moments of an Air India flight carrying passengers inside the cabin just before it crashed near Ahmedabad on June 12, 2025, is false. However, upon further research, the footage was found to originate from the Yeti Airlines Flight 691 crash that occurred in Pokhara, Nepal, on January 15, 2023. For all details, please follow the report.

Claim:

‍
Viral videos circulating on social media claiming to show the final moments inside Air India flight AI‑171 before it crashed near Ahmedabad on June 12, 2025. The footage appears to have been recorded by a passenger during the flight and is being shared as real-time visuals from the recent tragedy. Many users have believed the clip to be genuine and linked it directly to the Air India incident.

‍

‍

Fact Check:

‍
To confirm the validity of the video going viral depicting the alleged final moments of Air India's AI-171 that crashed near Ahmedabad on 12 June 2025, we engaged in a comprehensive reverse image search and keyframe analysis then we got to know that the footage occurs back in January 2023, namely Yeti Airlines Flight 691 that crashed in Pokhara, Nepal. The visuals shared in the viral video match up, including cabin and passenger details, identically to the original livestream made by a passenger aboard the Nepal flight, confirming that the video is being reused out of context.

‍

‍

Moreover, well-respected and reliable news organisations, including New York Post and NDTV, have shared reports confirming that the video originated from the 2023 Nepal plane crash and has no relation to the recent Air India incident. The Press Information Bureau (PIB) also released a clarification dismissing the video as disinformation. Reliable reports from the past, visual evidence, and reverse search verification all provide complete agreement in that the viral video is falsely attributed to the AI-171 tragedy.

‍

‍

Conclusion:

‍
The viral footage does not show the AI-171 crash near Ahmedabad on 12 June 2025. It is an irrelevant, previously recorded livestream from the January 2023 Yeti Airlines crash in Pokhara, Nepal, falsely repurposed as breaking news. It’s essential to rely on verified and credible news agencies. Please refer to official investigation reports when discussing such sensitive events.

• Claim: A dramatic clip of passengers inside a crashing plane is being falsely linked to the recent Air India tragedy in Ahmedabad.
• Claimed On: Social Media
• ‍Fact Check: False and Misleading

‍

Introduction

Deepfake technology, which combines the words "deep learning" and "fake," uses highly developed artificial intelligence—specifically, generative adversarial networks (GANs)—to produce computer-generated content that is remarkably lifelike, including audio and video recordings. Because it can provide credible false information, there are concerns about its misuse, including identity theft and the transmission of fake information. Cybercriminals leverage AI tools and technologies for malicious activities or for committing various cyber frauds. By such misuse of advanced technologies such as AI, deepfake, and voice clones. Such new cyber threats have emerged. 

India Topmost destination for deepfake attacks

According to Sumsub’s identity fraud report 2023, a well-known digital identity verification company with headquarters in the UK. India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan have become an important participants in the Asia-Pacific identity fraud scene with India’s fraud rate growing exponentially by 2.99% from 2022 to 2023. They are among the top ten nations most impacted by the use of deepfake technology. Deepfake technology is being used in a significant number of cybercrimes, according to the newly released Sumsub Identity Fraud Report for 2023, and this trend is expected to continue in the upcoming year. This highlights the need for increased cybersecurity awareness and safeguards as identity fraud poses an increasing concern in the area. 

How Deeepfake Works 

Deepfakes are a fascinating and worrisome phenomenon that have emerged in the modern digital landscape. These realistic-looking but wholly artificial videos have become quite popular in the last few months. Such realistic-looking, but wholly artificial, movies have been ingrained in the very fabric of our digital civilisation as we navigate its vast landscape. The consequences are enormous and the attraction is irresistible.  

Deep Learning Algorithms

Deepfakes examine large datasets, frequently pictures or videos of a target person, using deep learning techniques, especially Generative Adversarial Networks. By mimicking and learning from gestures, speech patterns, and facial expressions, these algorithms can extract valuable information from the data. By using sophisticated approaches, generative models create material that mixes seamlessly with the target context. Misuse of this technology, including the dissemination of false information, is a worry. Sophisticated detection techniques are becoming more and more necessary to separate real content from modified content as deepfake capabilities improve.

Generative Adversarial Networks

Deepfake technology is based on GANs, which use a dual-network design. Made up of a discriminator and a generator, they participate in an ongoing cycle of competition. The discriminator assesses how authentic the generated information is, whereas the generator aims to create fake material, such as realistic voice patterns or facial expressions. The process of creating and evaluating continuously leads to a persistent improvement in Deepfake's effectiveness over time. The whole deepfake production process gets better over time as the discriminator adjusts to become more perceptive and the generator adapts to produce more and more convincing content. 

 Effect on Community

The extensive use of Deepfake technology has serious ramifications for several industries. As technology develops, immediate action is required to appropriately manage its effects. And promoting ethical use of technologies. This includes strict laws and technological safeguards. Deepfakes are computer trickery that mimics prominent politicians' statements or videos. Thus, it's a serious issue since it has the potential to spread instability and make it difficult for the public to understand the true nature of politics. Deepfake technology has the potential to generate totally new characters or bring stars back to life for posthumous roles in the entertainment industry. It gets harder and harder to tell fake content from authentic content, which makes it simpler for hackers to trick people and businesses.

Ongoing Deepfake Assaults In India

Deepfake videos continue to target popular celebrities, Priyanka Chopra is the most recent victim of this unsettling trend. Priyanka's deepfake adopts a different strategy than other examples including actresses like Rashmika Mandanna, Katrina Kaif, Kajol, and Alia Bhatt. Rather than editing her face in contentious situations, the misleading film keeps her look the same but modifies her voice and replaces real interview quotes with made-up commercial phrases. The deceptive video shows Priyanka promoting a product and talking about her yearly salary, highlighting the worrying development of deepfake technology and its possible effects on prominent personalities.

Actions Considered by Authorities

A PIL was filed requesting the Delhi High Court that access to websites that produce deepfakes be blocked. The petitioner's attorney argued in court that the government should at the very least establish some guidelines to hold individuals accountable for their misuse of deepfake and AI technology. He also proposed that websites should be asked to identify information produced through AI as such and that they should be prevented from producing illegally. A division bench highlighted how complicated the problem is and suggested the government (Centre) to arrive at a balanced solution without infringing the right to freedom of speech and expression (internet).  

Information Technology Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw stated that new laws and guidelines would be implemented by the government to curb the dissemination of deepfake content. He presided over a meeting involving social media companies to talk about the problem of deepfakes. "We will begin drafting regulation immediately, and soon, we are going to have a fresh set of regulations for deepfakes. this might come in the way of amending the current framework or ushering in new rules, or a new law," he stated.

Prevention and Detection Techniques

To effectively combat the growing threat posed by the misuse of deepfake technology, people and institutions should place a high priority on developing critical thinking abilities, carefully examining visual and auditory cues for discrepancies, making use of tools like reverse image searches, keeping up with the latest developments in deepfake trends, and rigorously fact-check reputable media sources. Important actions to improve resistance against deepfake threats include putting in place strong security policies, integrating cutting-edge deepfake detection technologies, supporting the development of ethical AI, and encouraging candid communication and cooperation. We can all work together to effectively and mindfully manage the problems presented by deepfake technology by combining these tactics and adjusting the constantly changing terrain.

Conclusion

Advanced artificial intelligence-powered deepfake technology produces extraordinarily lifelike computer-generated information, raising both creative and moral questions. Misuse of tech or deepfake presents major difficulties such as identity theft and the propagation of misleading information, as demonstrated by examples in India, such as the latest deepfake video involving Priyanka Chopra. It is important to develop critical thinking abilities, use detection strategies including analyzing audio quality and facial expressions, and keep up with current trends in order to counter this danger. A thorough strategy that incorporates fact-checking, preventative tactics, and awareness-raising is necessary to protect against the negative effects of deepfake technology. Important actions to improve resistance against deepfake threats include putting in place strong security policies, integrating cutting-edge deepfake detection technologies, supporting the development of ethical AI, and encouraging candid communication and cooperation. We can all work together to effectively and mindfully manage the problems presented by deepfake technology by combining these tactics and making adjustments to the constantly changing terrain. Creating a true cyber-safe environment for netizens. 

References:

• https://yourstory.com/2023/11/unveiling-deepfake-technology-impact
• https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/celebrities/story/deepfake-alert-priyanka-chopra-falls-prey-after-rashmika-mandanna-katrina-kaif-and-alia-bhatt-2472293-2023-12-05
• https://www.csoonline.com/article/1251094/deepfakes-emerge-as-a-top-security-threat-ahead-of-the-2024-us-election.html
• https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/hc-unwilling-to-step-in-to-curb-deepfakes-delhi-high-court/articleshow/105739942.cms
• https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/india-among-top-targets-of-deepfake-identity-fraud-2472241-2023-12-05
• https://sumsub.com/fraud-report-2023/

Introduction
‍

In April 2026, a class action suit in a federal court in California rejuvenated one of the most basic assertions in digital communication: that private messages are private. The suit claims that Meta Platforms, its subsidiary WhatsApp, and third-party contractors such as Accenture could have accessed user messages even though it had long promised end-to-end encryption.

This case is not merely about a single company or a single platform. It poses more profound questions regarding the definition, communication and regulation of privacy in an age when digital infrastructure is becoming more and more incomprehensible or unprovable to regular users.
‍

What the Lawsuit Actually Says
‍

The suit was filed by plaintiffs Brian Y. Shirazi and Nida Samson, who alleged that WhatsApp, Meta and contractors had intercepted and shared private messages with third parties without their consent. The complaint states that the federal investigators were notified by the whistleblowers that employees of Meta and external contractors had access to the content of WhatsApp messages that were expected to be encrypted and inaccessible.

This directly puts into question the main privacy promise of WhatsApp. The platform has been promoting itself as an end-to-end encrypted service in which not even WhatsApp can read your messages. The case asserts that this assertion was deceptive in its application and that no one ever gave any consent prior to their messages being intercepted, stored, or read.

The plaintiffs are proposing to represent a nationwide class of users of WhatsApp who sent or received messages between April 5, 2016, and the current time and subclasses in California and Pennsylvania. The claims involve breach of contract, California laws on privacy and data violations, false advertising and the Pennsylvania Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Act.

It should be mentioned that they are allegations. Similar assertions have been refuted by Metacomet in the past, with the company asserting that its encryption frameworks ensure that the company cannot access the messages. The case is in progress, and no facts have been found.
‍

The Grey Area No One Talks About
‍

In order to see the significance of this lawsuit outside the court, it is useful to consider the way modern messaging platforms actually work. In principle, end-to-end encryption means that only the sender and receiver can decipher a message. Even the service provider should not be able to access the content.

However, there is a grey space that is seldom publicly discussed: content moderation. User reports, metadata analysis or restricted message review processes are common methods used by platforms to identify harmful content, like fraud, child exploitation, or spam. The complaint indicates that such moderation procedures might have opened avenues to the content of messages to human reviewers or automated systems more than users were made to think.

This is not the first time that privacy and safety are at odds. Many jurisdictions have also advocated access to encrypted communications through legal means in the name of national security or criminal investigations. What this suit does is put that tension into even more stark relief by asking whether platforms are really open with users about these trade-offs.
‍

The Consent Problem

‍

The emphasis on consent is one of the most significant implications of this case. The plaintiffs claim that the users were never warned that their messages would be accessed by the employees or third parties and were never provided with any meaningful option on the same.

This is where the case turns into a data governance issue, rather than a legal one. Most data protection models consider the legality of data processing to be based on whether the users know how their data is being processed or not. When the accusations are found to be true, then the matter is not technical. It would be a contractual and ethical failure, a disjuncture between what platforms promise and what they do.

The implications are huge to the billions of users who use WhatsApp to communicate, both personally and professionally, and even politically.

‍

What This Means Going Forward

‍

An effective attack on the encryption assertions of WhatsApp might have actual implications for the rest of the digital ecosystem. Users might start doubting that any platform can be really considered to guarantee privacy. The regulators can advocate more stringent disclosure policies and compulsory independent audits of encryption systems. Social networks might have to re-architect their moderation frameworks to make sure that safety features do not silently compromise privacy guarantees that they claim.

Meanwhile, there is a real policy dilemma in this case that cannot be disregarded. Complete privacy may preclude the capacity to identify abuse or hateful material. The manner in which that balance is achieved and, more to the point, the manner in which it is made transparent to users is an issue that has yet to be addressed by policymakers, civil society and the tech industry.

Other technical experts have also questioned the plausibility of the claims in the lawsuit at scale, noting that it would be an extraordinary undertaking to systematically bypass end-to-end encryption. This further supports the argument of independent verification mechanisms. The problem is that users should not be forced to decide what they should believe in more: corporate guarantees or legal charges. There must be rules that can be enforced which are above the two.

‍

Conclusion: Beyond One Lawsuit
‍

The WhatsApp class action is eventually concerning a structural issue within the digital economy. Users are expected to have faith in systems that they cannot observe, on the assertions that they cannot test themselves.

This case is a warning, regardless of whether the allegations are proved or not. Privacy cannot be based on marketing language. It needs legally binding norms, actual transparency in the treatment of data, and external control that will provide users with something more to hang on than a tagline.

‍

References
‍

• https://www.bitdefender.com/en-us/blog/hotforsecurity/lawsuit-claims-meta-can-access-whatsapp-messages-despite-end-to-end-encryption-2
• https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2026/02/02/whatsapp-encryption-a-lawsuit-and-a-lot-of-noise/
• https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-25/lawsuit-claims-meta-can-see-whatsapp-chats-in-breach-of-privacy
• https://www.classaction.org/blog/despite-privacy-promises-meta-third-parties-read-and-store-whatsapp-messages-class-action-lawsuit-alleges

‍